Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2020/Indigenous Australian education and work motivation

From Wikiversity
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Aliciajm4 in topic Comments
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comments

[edit source]

You may want to look at the format of your references. References which have been used within the content of your chapter should be listed under the heading 'references' in APA formatting. External links are links to external information sources which may not have been referenced but are relevant to the topic. For example you may wish to use the AIME website https://aimementoring.com/ as an external link even if not directly referenced.

Hi, I think your topic chapter is very interesting! https://www.actcoss.org.au/sites/default/files/public/publications/gulanga-good-practice-guide-preferences-terminology-referring-to-aboriginal-torres-strait-islander-peoples.pdf I have attached this link which provides a guide on terminology when writing about Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people. I have found this useful in past assignments :) --Shayley Woodgate (discusscontribs) 10:01, 11 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Harter and White's effectance motivation theory could be applied to Indigenous Australian work motivation from an intrinsic perspective, as it states that people desire interaction with their environment. Ryan and Deci's (2000) taxonomy of motivation theory could also be applied to motivating Indigenous Australians to engage in work.--Aliciajm4 (discusscontribs) 05:43, 18 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Case Study Examples

[edit source]

This seems to be an extremely interesting topic! I would suggest looking at successful programs that have already been implemented and maybe even suggesting ways that the program could have been expanded. This could also lead to yourself looking at the ways in which the program did motivate others and suggesting ways to use these techniques within more settings to increase motivation elsewhere. --U3187381 (discusscontribs) 05:11, 11 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Heading casing

[edit source]
FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for sentence casing. For example, the wikitext should be:

== Cats and mice ==

rather than

== Cats and Mice ==

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:10, 20 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title

[edit source]
  1. Wasn't provided
  2. Have added it

User page

[edit source]
  1. Created - minimal
  2. About me
    1. Description about self provided
    2. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  3. Add link to book chapter

Social contribution

[edit source]
  1. Use a numbered list.
  2. Summarised with 1 direct and 1 indirect link to evidence.
  3. Add direct links to Wikiversity contribution evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.

Section headings

[edit source]
  1. Under-developed, 1-level heading structure - develop further, perhaps using a 2-level structure for the largest section(s).
  2. Basic, 2-level heading structure - could benefit from further development
  3. Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections.
  4. Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading - use 0 or 2+ sub-headings.
  5. See earlier comment about Heading casing.
  6. Sections which include sub-sections should also include an overview paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.

Key points

[edit source]
  1. Overview - Consider adding:
    1. a description of the problem and what will be covered
    2. focus questions
    3. an image
    4. an example or case study
  2. Expand theory and research.
  3. Basic development of key points for each section, with relevant citations.
  4. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters.
  5. Consider including more examples/case studies.
  6. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. hasn't been developed
    2. what might the take-home, practical messages be?
  1. An image (figure) is presented.
  2. Caption
    1. uses APA style.
    2. could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text.
  3. Cite each figure at least once in the main text.

References

[edit source]
  1. Limited
  2. Choose 1 referencing style - currently 2 are used - APA style and wiki style
  3. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. capitalisation
    2. doi formatting
  4. None

Resources

[edit source]
  1. See also
    1. Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages
  2. External links
    1. Not included

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:10, 20 September 2020 (UTC)Reply