Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Great work Brydie! I think your Figure 1 is excellent. Suggestion: maybe using the DSM-5 to help define the Mental disorders will be beneficial for you as your chapter progresses! I look forward to seeing the final chapter once its completed! --Maddkilby (discuss • contribs) 22:10, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hi, awesome topic you've picked! One comment I would make is to consider putting empirical data in your mental disorders section to explore help reflect the extent of the problem. --BMPENFOLD (discuss • contribs) 03:24, 13 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
Sections which include sub-sections should also include an overview paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
Avoid providing too much background information. Instead, briefly summarise generic concepts and provide internal wiki links to further information. Then the focus of most of the content can be on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
The chapter doesn't present a sufficient description of how psychological needs may influence body image based on the best and most relevant psychological theory.
It is unclear why this chapter goes beyond SDT as a theoretical framework. SDT would be quite sufficient as it is the main contemporary theory about psychological needs and can be readily applied to analysing its effects on body image.
There is too much general description of background theory and too little application of psychological need theory to body image.
The Reeve (2018) textbook is overused as a citation - instead, utilise primary, peer-reviewed sources.
No use of embedded links to related book chapters. Embedding interwiki links links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Good use of images.
Basic use of tables. Figures 1 and 2 should be re-captioned as tables.
Very good use of feature boxes.
Basic use of quizzes.
The quiz questions could be more effective as learning prompts by being embedded as single questions within each corresponding section rather than being presented as a set of questions at the end.
Basic use of a case study. To improve, tailor the case study to the topic (i.e., the relationship between psychological needs and body image).
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The chapter title but not the sub-title are used in the video title and opening slide - the sub-title would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
Audio recording quality was very good.
Video recording quality was excellent.
Image sources and their copyright status are provided.
A copyright license for the presentation is not provided.
A link to the book chapter is provided.
A link from the book chapter is provided.
A written description of the presentation is provided.