Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2017/Misophonia

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comments welcome[edit source]

Hello, and welcome to my page.

If you have any helpful suggestions or input, please feel free to leave a note here. Thank you!

Hello U100155,

I am really enjoying your Chapter so far, the fun anecdotes make me giggle :)

looking at your subheadings I was wondering if the debate is about the existence of Misophonia as opposed to what kind of problem it actually is :)

Kind Regards, Stephanie Feltham

Hello Stephanie! Thank you for your feedback. Yes, I was coming to the conclusion that no-one really doubts misophonia is a thing, it is more that they are interested in whether it should be classified as a psychiatric illness or not. It's not in the DSM, but some people think it should be while others regard it more as a hearing issue. It's quite interesting to read the different viewpoints!

Hi again,

Oh wow that's actually really interesting, I never knew that It was, in some circles, considered to be a Hearing issue rather than a mental health issue. I really look forward to seeing how you develop this Book chapter :)

Kind Regards, Stephanie Feltham

P.S I love your cat pic!!!!!!!!!

!-- Official topic development feedback -->

Topic development review and feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks will be available later via Moodle. Keep an eye on Announcements. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title, sub-title, TOC[edit source]

  1. Excellent

User page[edit source]

  1. Created
  2. Used effectively

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. No logged contributions with links to evidence.

Section headings[edit source]

  1. 2-level heading structure driven by focus questions which relate directly to the overall topic (good)
  2. Sections which include sub-sections should also include an overview paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.

Key points[edit source]

  1. At least one key point per section, including many citations (good)
  2. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles.
  3. Consider including more examples/case studies
  4. Wikiversity can link to embedded sounds from Wikimedia Commons - perhaps search for sounds there to see if there's anything relevant

Image[edit source]

  1. Well used - maybe caption should refer to misophonia?
  2. Consider increasing image size from default

References[edit source]

  1. Excellent sources.
  2. For full APA style:
    1. Include space after author initials abbreviation
    2. Use the new recommended format for dois - http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2014/07/how-to-use-the-new-doi-format-in-apa-style.html
    3. Do not include issue numbers for journals which are continuously numbered within a volume

Resources[edit source]

  1. Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:14, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a rich, interesting chapter on a relatively novel topic.
  2. Excellent, engaging Overview - but, be careful - is misophonia only related to eating sounds? Clarify.
  3. For additional feedback, see these copyedits.

Theory[edit source]

  1. Symptoms, causes, and theories were very well described and explained, with illustrative examples.

Research[edit source]

  1. Rather than "subjects", refer to "participants".
  2. When describing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
  3. Greater emphasis on major reviews and meta-analyses would be helpful.
  4. Some statements were unreferenced - see the [factual?] tags

Written expression[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Write in the third person perspective, although first person scenarios/case studies could be used. But the chapter should be collaboratively-authorable into the future, rather than in the voice of a single author.
  2. Layout - well structured
  3. Learning features
    1. Interwiki links are well used.
    2. Quotes for misophonics are interesting and helpful.
    3. Some limited use of images.
  4. APA style
    1. Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numbers (e.g., 10)
    2. Citations
      1. A comma is needed before "&" for citations involving three or more authors
    3. References are not in full APA style e.g.,
      1. Add spaces between author initials
      2. Do not include issue numbers for journals which are continuously numbered within volumes.

Quiet hour for shopping[edit source]

Shopping made easier for people with autism as Coles introduces ‘Quiet Hour’ -- Jtneill - Talk - c 20:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a fantastic, informative, engaging, fun, and interesting presentation.

Structure and content[edit source]

  1. Well selected and structured content - not too much or too little - with Overview, Body, and Conclusion.

Communication[edit source]

  1. The presentation is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to watch and listen to.
  2. Audio is expressive and easy to listen to.
  3. Animated visuals combined with examples effectively convey the key concepts, with examples.

Production quality[edit source]

  1. The link from the book chapter started mid-way through the presentation - now corrected.
  2. Use the full chapter title and sub-title in the title for the video.
  3. Category is probably better as Education.
  4. Audio and video recording quality was excellent.
  5. Add acknowledgement of image sources.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:20, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]