WikiJournal of Medicine/What are Systematic Reviews?/XML

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doi_batch version="4.4.0" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.4.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.4.0 http://www.crossref.org/schema/deposit/crossref4.4.0.xsd">
 <head>
  <depositor>
   <depositor_name>wkjm</depositor_name> 
   <email_address><span class="nowrap">Contact[[File:At sign.svg|alt=At sign|15px|@|link=]]WikiJMed.org</span></email_address>
  </depositor>
  <registrant>WEB-FORM</registrant>
 </head>
 <body>
  <journal>
   <journal_metadata>
    <full_title>WikiJournal of Medicine/What are Systematic Reviews?</full_title>
    <abbrev_title>Wiki.J.Med.</abbrev_title>
    <issn media_type='electronic'>2002-4436 / 2470-6345 / 2639-5347</issn>
    <doi_data>
     <doi>10.15347/WJM</doi>
     <resource>http://www.WikiJMed.org/</resource>
    </doi_data>
   </journal_metadata> 
   <journal_issue>  
    <publication_date media_type='online'>     
     <year>2022</year>  
    </publication_date>   
    <journal_volume>     
     <volume></volume>
    </journal_volume>   
    <issue></issue>
   </journal_issue>
   <journal_article publication_type='full_text'>   
    <titles>     
     <title>What are Systematic Reviews?</title>
    </titles>   
    <contributors>
    <person_name sequence='first' contributor_role='author'>
     <surname></surname>
    </person_name>  
    </contributors> 
    <publication_date media_type='online'>     
     <year>2022</year>
    </publication_date>   
    <doi_data>     
     <doi></doi>     
     <resource>https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Medicine/What_are_Systematic_Reviews%3F/XML</resource>
    </doi_data>
   </journal_article>
  </journal>
  <article>
   <permissions>
    <license license-type="open-access">
     <license-p>[[File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg|11px|link=Wikipedia:Open Access]] [[File:Cc.logo.circle.svg|16px|link=Wikipedia:Creative Commons]]
This is an open access article distributed under the&nbsp;[https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution License], which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    </p>
Systematic reviews are a type of review that uses repeatable analytical methods to collect secondary data and analyse it. Systematic reviews are a type of evidence synthesis which formulate research questions that are broad or narrow in scope, and identify and synthesize data that directly relate to the systematic review question.   While some people might associate ‘systematic review’ with 'meta-analysis', there are multiple kinds of review which can be defined as ‘systematic’ which do not involve a meta-analysis. Some systematic reviews critically appraise research studies, and synthesize findings qualitatively or quantitatively.   Systematic reviews are often designed to provide an exhaustive summary of current evidence relevant to a research question. For example, systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials are an important way of informing evidence-based medicine,   and a review of existing studies is often quicker and cheaper than embarking on a new study.  While systematic reviews are often applied in the biomedical or healthcare context, they can be used in other areas where an assessment of a precisely defined subject would be helpful.   Systematic reviews may examine clinical tests, public health interventions, environmental interventions,   social interventions, adverse effects, qualitative evidence syntheses, methodological reviews, policy reviews, and economic evaluations.      An understanding of systematic reviews and how to implement them in practice is highly recommended for professionals involved in the delivery of health care, public health and public policy.
    </p>
   </abstract>
  </article>
 </body>
</doi_batch>
  1. "systematic review". GET-IT glossary. Retrieved 18 November 2015.
  2. "Cochrane Update. 'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review". Journal of Public Health 33 (1): 147–50. March 2011. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdr015. PMID 21345890. 
  3. "What is EBM?". Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. 2009-11-20. Archived from the original on 2011-04-06. Retrieved 2011-06-17.
  4. Ader, Herman J.; Mellenbergh, Gideon J.; Hand, David J. (2008). "Methodological quality". Advising on Research Methods: A consultant's companion. Johannes van Kessel Publishing. ISBN 978-90-79418-02-2. https://books.google.com/books?id=LCnOj4ZFyjkC&printsec=frontcover&hl=fr#v=onepage&q=%22Methodological%20quality%22&f=false. 
  5. Bilotta, Gary S.; Milner, Alice M.; Boyd, Ian (2014). "On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policies". Environmental Science & Policy 42: 67–77. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.05.010. 
  6. Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care.. York: University of York, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. 2008. ISBN 978-1-900640-47-3. https://www.york.ac.uk/media/crd/Systematic_Reviews.pdf. Retrieved 17 June 2011. 
  7. Systematic reviews in the social sciences. Wiley Blackwell. 2006. ISBN 978-1-4051-2110-1. http://www.cebma.org/wp-content/uploads/Pettigrew-Roberts-SR-in-the-Soc-Sc.pdf.