We do induction over
, the number of the vectors in the family. For
,
there is nothing to show. Suppose now that the statement is already proven for
, and let
linearly independent vectors
-
be given. By the induction hypothesis, applied to the vectors
(which are also linearly independent)
-
there exists a subset
such that the family
-
is a basis of
. We want to apply
the basis exchange lemma
to this basis. As it is a basis, we can write
-

Suppose that all coefficients
.
Then we get a contradiction to the linear independence of
,
.
Hence, there exists some
with
.
We put
.
Then
is a subset of
with
elements. By the basis exchange lemma, we can replace the basis vector
by
,
and we obtain the new basis
-
The final statement follows, since we have a subset with

elements inside a set with

elements.