Vector bundles and tight closure (Triest 2023)/Lecture 3
- Plus closure
For an ideal in a domain define its plus closure by
Equivalent: Let be the absolute integral closure of . This is the integral closure of in an algebraic closure of the quotient field (first considered by Artin). Then
The plus closure commutes with localization.
We also have the inclusion . Here the question arises:
Question: Is ?
This question is known as the tantalizing question in tight closure theory.
In terms of forcing algebras and their torsors, the containment inside the plus closure means that there exists a -dimensional closed subscheme inside the torsor which meets the exceptional fiber (the fiber over the maximal ideal) in isolated points, and this means that the so-called superheight of the extended ideal is . In this case the local cohomological dimension of the torsor must be as well, since it contains a closed subscheme with this cohomological dimension. So also the plus closure depends only on the torsor.
In characteristic zero, the plus closure behaves very differently compared with positive characteristic. If is a normal domain of characteristic , then the trace map shows that the plus closure is trivial, for every ideal .
- Plus closure in dimension two
Let be a field and let be a normal two-dimensional standard-graded domain over with corresponding smooth projective curve . A homogeneous -primary ideal with homogeneous ideal generators and another homogeneous element of degree yield a cohomology class
Let be the corresponding torsor. We have seen that the affineness of this torsor over is equivalent to the affineness of the corresponding torsor over (and to the property of not belonging to the tight closure). Now we want to understand what the property means for and for . Instead of the plus closure we will work with the graded plus closure , where holds if and only if there exists a finite graded extension such that . The existence of such an translates into the existence of a finite morphism
such that . Here we may assume that is also smooth. Therefore, we discuss the more general question when a cohomology class , where is a locally free sheaf on , can be annihilated by a finite morphism
of smooth projective curves. The advantage of this more general approach is that we may work with short exact sequences (in particular, the sequences coming from the Harder-Narasimhan filtration) in order to reduce the problem to semistable bundles which do not necessarily come from an ideal situation.
Let denote a smooth projective curve over an algebraically closed field , let be a locally free sheaf on and let
be a cohomology class with corresponding torsor . Then the following conditions are equivalent.- There exists a finite morphism
from a smooth projective curve such that .
- There exists a projective curve .
If (1) holds, then the pull-back is trivial (as a torsor), as it equals the torsor given by . Hence is isomorphic to a vector bundle and contains in particular a copy of . The image of this copy is a projective curve inside .
If (2) holds, then let be the normalization of . Since dominates , the resulting morphism
.
We want to show that the cohomological criterion for
(non)-affineness of a torsor along the Harder-Narasimhan filtration of the vector bundle also holds for the existence of projective curves inside the torsor, under the condition that the projective curve is defined over a finite field. This implies that tight closure is
(graded)
plus closure for graded -primary ideals in a two-dimensional graded domain over a finite field.
- Annihilation of cohomology classes of strongly semistable sheaves
We deal first with the situation of a strongly semistable sheaf of degree . The following two results are due to Lange and Stuhler. We say that a locally free sheaf is étale trivializable if there exists a finite étale morphism such that . Such bundles are directly related to linear representations of the étale fundamental group.
Let denote a finite field (or the algebraic closure of a finite field) and let be a smooth projective curve over . Let be a locally free sheaf over . Then is étale trivializable if and only if there exists some such that
.
Let denote a finite field (or the algebraic closure of a finite field) and let be a smooth projective curve over . Let be a strongly semistable locally free sheaf over of degree . Then there exists a finite morphism
We consider the family of locally free sheaves , . Because these are all semistable of degree , and defined over the same finite field, we must have (by the existence of the moduli space for vector bundles) a repetition, i.e.
for some . By Lemma 3.2 , the bundle admits an étale trivialization . Hence the finite map trivializes the bundle.
Let denote a finite field (or the algebraic closure of a finite field) and let be a smooth projective curve over . Let be a strongly semistable locally free sheaf over of nonnegative degree and let denote a cohomology class. Then there exists a finite morphism
If the degree of is positive, then a Frobenius pull-back has arbitrary large degree and is still semistable. By Serre duality we get that . So in this case we can annihilate the class by an iteration of the Frobenius alone.
So suppose that the degree is . Then there exists by Theorem 3.3 a finite morphism which trivializes the bundle. So we may assume that . Then the cohomology class has several components and it is enough to annihilate them separately by finite morphisms. But this is possible by the parameter theorem of K. Smith (or directly using Frobenius and Artin-Schreier extensions).
- The general case
We look now at an arbitrary locally free sheaf on , a smooth projective curve over a finite field. We want to show that the same numerical criterion (formulated in terms of the Harder-Narasimhan filtration) for non-affineness of a torsor holds also for the finite annihilation of the corresponding cohomomology class (or the existence of a projective curve inside the torsor).
Let denote a finite field (or the algebraic closure of a finite field) and let be a smooth projective curve over . Let be a locally free sheaf over and let denote a cohomology class. Let be a strong Harder-Narasimhan filtration of . We choose such that has degree and that has degree . We set
. Then the following are equivalent.- The class can be annihilated by a finite morphism.
- Some Frobenius power of the image of inside is .
Suppose that (1) holds. Then the torsor is not affine and hence by Theorem 2.12 also (2) holds.
So suppose that (2) is true. By applying a certain power of the Frobenius, we may assume that the image of the cohomology class in is . Hence the class stems from a cohomology class . We look at the short exact sequence
where the sheaf on the right hand side has a nonnegative degree. Therefore the image of in can be annihilated by a finite morphism due to Theorem 3.4 . Hence, after applying a finite morphism, we may assume that stems from a cohomology class . Going on inductively we see that can be annihilated by a finite morphism.
Let denote a smooth projective curve over the algebraic closure of a finite field , let be a locally free sheaf on and let
be a cohomology class with corresponding torsor . Then is affine if and only if it does not contain any projective curve.Due to Theorem 2.12 and Theorem 3.5 , for both properties the same numerical criterion does hold.
These results imply the following theorem in the setting of a two-dimensional graded ring.
Let be a standard-graded, two-dimensional normal domain over (the algebraic closure of) a finite field. Let be an -primary graded ideal. Then
This is also true for non-primary graded ideals and also for submodules in finitely generated graded submodules. Moreover, G. Dietz has shown that one can get rid also of the graded assumption
(of the ideal or module, but not of the ring).