University of Florida/Eml4507/s13 Team 3 Report 4

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Problem 4.1[edit | edit source]

On my honor, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid in doing this assignment. 

Given[edit | edit source]

Mode Shape for system. Mode slope increases and crosses into the positive region

Spring-damper-body arrangement as shown. Two separate forces applied to masses.
















γ γ





Find[edit | edit source]

Find the eigenvector corresponding to the eigenvalue for the spring-mass-damper system on p.53-113. Plot and comment on this mode shape. Verify that the eigenvectors are orthogonal to each other

Solution[edit | edit source]

Eigenvalues are found



We find the eigenvectors from







Set








Eigenvectors are orthogonal to each other:

EDU>> x= [-.8507;-.5257];
EDU>> y= [-.5257;.8507];
EDU>> transpose(y)*x
ans = 0

Problem 4.2[edit | edit source]

 On my honor, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid in doing this assignment. 

Given[edit | edit source]

Use same given values as in problem 4.1

Find[edit | edit source]

Mode Shape for system. Notice plot is the same even with different initial conditions

Find the eigenvectors for and when setting


Solution[edit | edit source]

We find the eigenvectors from







Set











We find the eigenvectors from







Set








R4.3 (fead.f08 p.11-3 (Method 1: Square Root Sum of Squares), p.14-3 (Method 2: Transformation Matrix) )[edit | edit source]

On my honor, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid in doing this assignment.


Given two methods for finding axial member forces[edit | edit source]

Free body diagram of an element


Method 1:[edit | edit source]



Method 2:[edit | edit source]




Find[edit | edit source]

  • Discuss computational efficiency of each method.
  • Reconcile analytically using both algebra and geometry


Method 1: Square Root Sum of Squares[edit | edit source]

Given[edit | edit source]



Discussion[edit | edit source]

The first method uses the Pythagorean Theorem, which is also a distance formula, to find the axial member forces from the nodal forces. This method only requires the two nodal forces on a node to find an axial member force. To use this method, the nodal forces are defined, and then put into the distance formula. Additional axial forces are found by defining additional nodal forces. The formula must be repeated each time to give each axial member force.


Method 2: Transformation Matrix[edit | edit source]

Given[edit | edit source]



Discussion[edit | edit source]

The second method uses the transformation matrix to add the projections of the nodal forces along the element. This method requires the two nodal forces and an angle. However, the angle can be applied to both ends of the node. To use this method, the transformation matrix, is created, with and , as well as the nodal force matrix .

The matrix multiplication performs the following operations:



To find additional axial member forces, new nodal forces and angles can be defined, and the transformation can be expanded. The matrix multiplication only has to be performed once for each element. The multiplication will give a matrix with all the axial forces.


Reconciliation using algebra and geometry[edit | edit source]

Free body diagram of a node


The Pythagorean Theorem is used for the first method. To reconcile this method with the second method, geometry is used to define the nodal forces in terms of .


These nodal force definitions are substituted into the Pythagorean Theorem, and the equation is simplified.