University of Florida/Egm6341/s10.team3.aks/HW2

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

(4) Derive the composite trapazoidal rule and composite simpson's rule from simple trapazoidal and simple simpson's rule[edit | edit source]

Ref Lecture notes p.9-3

Problem Statement[edit | edit source]

Show Simple Trapazoidal rulep.7-1 Composite Trapazoidal rule p.7-1

and

Show Simple Simpson's rule p.7-2 Composite Simpson's rulep.7-2

Solution[edit | edit source]

Composite Trapezoidal rule

From Simple trapezoidal rule we have ,


similarly we have

. . . .

Summation of all of above expression gives

Hence Proved..

Composite Simpson's Rule

From Simple Simpson's rule we obtain ,

where

Similarly

. . . .

After Summation of above terms we obtain


where n = 2k and k = 1,2,3,4.....

Hence Proved

(14) Prove[edit | edit source]

Ref Lecture p.15-2

Problem Statement[edit | edit source]

Prove that

where


Solution[edit | edit source]

Hence Proved ..

(12) Show Derivation[edit | edit source]

Ref: Lecture Notes p.15-1

Problem Statement[edit | edit source]

Show derivation that

Solution[edit | edit source]

From (4) in p.14-2, we can write down the expression of

Given :

f(x(t)) = F(t)

Let there exists

but


Hence Proved ,