Time management/Dimensionality

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Dimensionality of time management

Dimensionality[edit | edit source]

Time management can be conceptualised as a multidimensional construct (e.g., Macan, Shahani, Dipboye, & Phillips, 1990)[1]. Psychological research literature has identified several possible factor structures for time management.

3-factors (Britton & Tesser, 1991)[edit | edit source]

A study of 90 USA college students found that time management could be represented by three factors, based on 35 items (Britton & Tesser, 1991[2].):

  1. Short-range planning - daily or weekly planning, such as making a daily to-do list
  2. Long-range planning - setting goals for the entire quarter and being well organised
  3. Time attitudes - feeling in control of how time was spent and using time effectively

This three factor structure was replicated in a study of 350 Spanish students (Garcia-Ros, Pérez-González, & Hinojosa, 2004)[3].

4-factors (Macan et al., 1990)[edit | edit source]

A more widely cited model identifies four underlying factors (Macan et al., 1990)[1]:

  1. Setting goals and priorities
  2. Mechanics of scheduling and planning
  3. Preference for disorganisation
  4. Perceived control of time

The Time Management Behaviour Scale (TMBS), for which there is some validity evidence (TMBS, Macan et al., 1990[1]), is designed to measure these four factors. Macan's (et al. 1990[1], 1994[4]) models of time management have received the most support in the literature (Claessens et al., 2007[5]). However, there are some consistency issues and disagreement as to whether perceived control of time should be included (Claessens et al., 2007). Macan (1994)[4] has indicated that the perceived control of time factor is actually an outcome of time management and not a component.

The factor structure of the TMBS has been confirmed by Adams and Jex (1997) via confirmatory factor analysis[6].

5-factors (Bond & Feather, 1988)[edit | edit source]

Bond and Feather (1988)[7] conducted a survey study of three samples of university students, extracting a five factor model of time management:

  1. Sense of Purpose
  2. Structured Routine
  3. Present Orientation
  4. Effective Organisation
  5. Persistence

5-factors (Francis-Smythe & Robertson, 1999)[edit | edit source]

Francis-Smythe and Robertson (1999[8]) studied individual differences in time personality and identified five factors:

  1. Leisure Time Awareness
  2. Punctuality
  3. Planning
  4. Polychronicity
  5. Impatience

4-factors (Neill, 2017)[edit | edit source]

An alternative four-factor structure is shown in Figure 2.

These four factors are operationalised in the TSQFUS1 (which is derived from an earlier version, the TUSSTMQ9):

  1. Efficiency and effectiveness - General efficiency and effectiveness in use of one's time to get tasks done
  2. Meeting deadlines - The extent to which important deadlines are met. König and Kleinman (2005) also argue that Meeting Deadlines is also an important factor of time management.
  3. Scheduling or Goal setting and Planning - Setting goals, making plans, and self-organising allocations of time to tasks
  4. Procrastination or Distractability - Engagement in distraction and goal-irrelevant behaviour
Figure 2. Four possible time management factors

See also[edit | edit source]

  1. Time management
  2. Time management questionnaires
  3. University student time management#Time management factors

References[edit | edit source]

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Macan, T. M., Shahani, C., Dipboye, R. L., & Phillips, A. P. (1990). College students' time management: Correlations with academic performance and stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 760-768.
  2. ↑ Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of time-management practices on college grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83 , 405-410.
  3. ↑ García-Ros, R., Pérez-González, F., & Hinojosa (2004). Assessing time management skills as an important aspect of student learning. The construction and evaluation of a time management scale with Spanish high school students. School Psychology International, 25, 167-183.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Macan, T. H. (1994). Time management: Test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3), 381-391.
  5. ↑ Claessens, B. J. C., van Erde, W., Rutte, C. G. & Roe, R. A. (2005). A review of the time management literature. Personnel Review, 36, 255-276.
  6. ↑ Adams, G. A., & Jex, S. M. (1997). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Time Management Behavior Scale. Psychological Reports, 80, 225-226. doi: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1997.80.1.225
  7. ↑ Bond, M. & Feather, N. (1988). Some correlates of structure and purpose in the use of time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 321-329.
  8. ↑ Francis-Smythe, J. A. & Robertson, I. T. (1999). Time-related individual differences. Time & Society, 8, 273-292.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Time_management/Dimensionality&oldid=1832311"