Talk:Wiki science/Budding Effect

Edit history

• 18:59, 14 October 2010 Adrignola m (2,531 bytes) (fixed navigation) (rollback(AJAX) | undo) [automatically checked]
• 13:33, 20 September 2010 Adrignola m (2,560 bytes) (fixed link) [checked by Thenub314]
• 22:28, 4 June 2009 DavidCary (2,587 bytes) (→External links: +Starting and Running a Wiki Website)
• 04:14, 27 January 2009 Swift m (2,471 bytes) (→External links: Rm {{incomplete}}: It goes without saying.)
• 00:51, 2 October 2007 76.28.67.224 (2,487 bytes) (→External links: fix links evo wikis domain is no longer evowiki.org .)
• 22:34, 24 August 2006 A3 nm m (2,495 bytes) (→Licences: {{...}})
• 22:32, 24 August 2006 A3 nm m (2,492 bytes) (TopNav)
• 06:01, 4 August 2006 Jguk m (2,434 bytes) (Wiki Science:Budding Effect moved to Wiki Science/Budding Effect)
• 05:59, 4 August 2006 Jguk m (2,434 bytes)
• 15:17, 3 February 2006 Chris Mason (2,407 bytes) (Broken links, if someone could find the anticipated target, please do)
• 19:00, 16 October 2005 68.194.251.65 (2,334 bytes) (→Wikimedia sister projects)
• 01:13, 2 September 2004 213.107.224.5 (2,343 bytes) (remove pointless example of a wiki that doesn't exist)
• 02:20, 26 August 2004 68.1.94.231 (2,889 bytes) (Updated Links to Wikipedia & Wictionary)
• 20:53, 28 May 2004 216.254.10.130 (2,873 bytes) (Some notes on the technologies assisting budding.)
• 20:43, 28 May 2004 216.254.10.130 (2,375 bytes) (→External links: Linked CommunityWiki:WikiBudding)
• 00:05, 16 May 2004 Akagu (2,227 bytes)
• 00:03, 16 May 2004 Akagu (2,015 bytes) (=Wikimedia sister projects=)
• 00:31, 15 May 2004 Akagu (1,916 bytes)
• 00:27, 15 May 2004 Akagu m (1,922 bytes)
• 23:51, 14 May 2004 Akagu m (1,916 bytes) ({{msg:WikiScience}})
• 23:44, 14 May 2004 Akagu m (1,895 bytes) (recyclopedia is not assessible anymore)
• 17:56, 1 April 2004 Rs2 m (1,837 bytes) (changed location of Wiki Family Tree)
• 12:34, 1 April 2004 Akagu (1,794 bytes)
• 15:04, 20 March 2004 JWSchmidt (873 bytes) (external link added) 13:48, 22 January 2004 81.101.8.93 (724 bytes)
• 13:46, 22 January 2004 81.101.8.93 (720 bytes)

Topic

" Wikibooks itself 'budded' off of WikiPedia, out of the need to provide more in-depth information in various topics"

I'm not sure that "the need to provide in-depth information" is the right way to describe the situation. In Wikipedia I have seen the suggestion that, "Education material should go to Wikibooks. Reference material should stay here."

"Reference material" in fields like mathematics and biology can be meaningless to anyone who is not an expert. I hate the idea that someone would go to Wikipedia and find nothing but jargon-laced articles about science and mathematics that can only be understood by experts.

How do we define the correct balance between serving experts and serving non-experts who are interested in a topic? Is it enough to simply make links between Wikipedia and Wikibooks? JWSchmidt 15:05, 15 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I agree :) Wikipedia articles should be understandable by someone who is not an expert in the field - or explicitly point to another Wikipedia article that gives an introduction. For instance, the Galois group article does not need to explain a novice what a group is, but it would be very useful to make it clear that the novice should first try to understand what is written in the group article.
Anyway, be bolder! :) You could have changed this line 2 months ago - I have overlooked it many times. Akagu 23:59, 15 May 2004 (UTC)

Multilingual budding effect

A poorly understood phenomenon is the difference with which wikipedias in different languages grow. As a null hypothesis, one would expect some fixed rate between size of speaker community and size of wikipedia (eventually corrected for size of online speakers...). But this is not what we get. Why? Trondtr 06:34, 15 October 2006 (UTC).