Talk:WikiJournal Preprints/Induced stem cells

WikiJournal Preprints
Open access • Publication charge free • Public peer review

Submit

Authors

Reviewers

Editors

About

Journals

Journals

WikiJournal of Medicine

WikiJournal of Science

WikiJournal of Humanities

WikiJournal of PPB

WikiJournal Preprints

More resources

More resources

Articles in review

---

Editorial guidelines
Ethics statement
Bylaws
Indexing
Financials and reports
1-year/3-year plan
Proposed platform
Meeting minutes
Calendar

---

Contact

WikiJournal User Group is a publishing group of open-access, free-to-publish, Wikipedia-integrated academic journals. <seo title=" Wikiversity Journal User Group, WikiJournal Free to publish, Open access, Open-access, Non-profit, online journal, Public peer review "/>

<meta name='citation_doi' value=>

This article is an unpublished pre-print undergoing public peer review organised by the WikiJournal of Science.

If it passes peer review, it is intended to also be used to update the Wikipedia article Induced stem cells.You can follow its progress through the peer review process at this tracking page.

First submitted: 31 May 2020
Article text

---

QID: Q100400683

---

Suggested (provisional) preprint citation format:
"Induced stem cells". WikiJournal Preprints. Wikidata Q100400683. 

License: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original author and source are credited.

Editors:

Thomas Shafee contact

Reviewers: (comments)

Vishnu Sri Priya J

---

Article information

Author: anon until publication

See author information ▼

This is the pre-publication public peer review for the article Induced stem cells

• Check for potential plagiarism (instructions for editors)
• Add a pre-publication peer review (instructions for reviewers)
• Update wikidata if article accepted or update wikidata if declined (instructions for editors)

Plagiarism check

 Comment Report from WMF copyvios tool: The main issue is the similarity with the Gladstone Institutes news article, where paraphrasing is sufficiently close that it would be best to rephrase the section on transdifferentiation by 9C. Similarities with other websites are merely common phrases, or reuse by others of content from this article, so do not constitute a problem. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)^talk 04:50, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Peer Review 1

Review by Dr Vishnu Sri Priya J , Mahe Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital
These assessment comments were submitted on 27 Feb 2023, and refer to this previous version of the article

Well drafted and innovative. Could have added more illustrations to make it attractive to the readers.

Treenxorr (discuss • contribs) 11:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)