Jump to content

Talk:PlanetPhysics/Weak Hopf C Algebra 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity

Original TeX Content from PlanetPhysics Archive

[edit source]
%%% This file is part of PlanetPhysics snapshot of 2011-09-01
%%% Primary Title: weak Hopf C*-algebra
%%% Primary Category Code: 00.
%%% Filename: WeakHopfCAlgebra2.tex
%%% Version: 2
%%% Owner: bci1
%%% Author(s): bci1
%%% PlanetPhysics is released under the GNU Free Documentation License.
%%% You should have received a file called fdl.txt along with this file.        
%%% If not, please write to gnu@gnu.org.
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\pagestyle{empty}
\setlength{\paperwidth}{8.5in}
\setlength{\paperheight}{11in}

\setlength{\topmargin}{0.00in}
\setlength{\headsep}{0.00in}
\setlength{\headheight}{0.00in}
\setlength{\evensidemargin}{0.00in}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0.00in}
\setlength{\textwidth}{6.5in}
\setlength{\textheight}{9.00in}
\setlength{\voffset}{0.00in}
\setlength{\hoffset}{0.00in}
\setlength{\marginparwidth}{0.00in}
\setlength{\marginparsep}{0.00in}
\setlength{\parindent}{0.00in}
\setlength{\parskip}{0.15in}

\usepackage{html}

% almost certainly you want these
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}

% define commands here
\usepackage{amsmath, amssymb, amsfonts, amsthm, amscd, latexsym,enumerate}
\usepackage{xypic}
\usepackage[mathscr]{eucal}
\theoremstyle{plain}
\newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}[section]
\newtheorem{proposition}{Proposition}[section]
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
\newtheorem{corollary}{Corollary}[section]
\theoremstyle{definition}
\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}[section]
\newtheorem{example}{Example}[section]
%\theoremstyle{remark}
\newtheorem{remark}{Remark}[section]
\newtheorem*{notation}{Notation}
\newtheorem*{claim}{Claim}

\renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\ensuremath{\fnsymbol{footnote}}}
\numberwithin{equation}{section}

\newcommand{\Ad}{{\rm Ad}}
\newcommand{\Aut}{{\rm Aut}}
\newcommand{\Cl}{{\rm Cl}}
\newcommand{\Co}{{\rm Co}}
\newcommand{\DES}{{\rm DES}}
\newcommand{\Diff}{{\rm Diff}}
\newcommand{\Dom}{{\rm Dom}}
\newcommand{\Hol}{{\rm Hol}}
\newcommand{\Mon}{{\rm Mon}}
\newcommand{\Hom}{{\rm Hom}}
\newcommand{\Ker}{{\rm Ker}}
\newcommand{\Ind}{{\rm Ind}}
\newcommand{\IM}{{\rm Im}}
\newcommand{\Is}{{\rm Is}}
\newcommand{\ID}{{\rm id}}
\newcommand{\GL}{{\rm GL}}
\newcommand{\Iso}{{\rm Iso}}
\newcommand{\rO}{{\rm O}}
\newcommand{\Sem}{{\rm Sem}}
\newcommand{\St}{{\rm St}}
\newcommand{\Sym}{{\rm Sym}}
\newcommand{\SU}{{\rm SU}}
\newcommand{\Tor}{{\rm Tor}}
\newcommand{\U}{{\rm U}}

\newcommand{\A}{\mathcal A}
\newcommand{\Ce}{\mathcal C}
\newcommand{\D}{\mathcal D}
\newcommand{\E}{\mathcal E}
\newcommand{\F}{\mathcal F}
\newcommand{\G}{\mathcal G}
\renewcommand{\H}{\mathcal H}
\renewcommand{\cL}{\mathcal L}
\newcommand{\Q}{\mathcal Q}
\newcommand{\R}{\mathcal R}
\newcommand{\cS}{\mathcal S}
\newcommand{\cU}{\mathcal U}
\newcommand{\W}{\mathcal W}

\newcommand{\bA}{\mathbb{A}}
\newcommand{\bB}{\mathbb{B}}
\newcommand{\bC}{\mathbb{C}}
\newcommand{\bD}{\mathbb{D}}
\newcommand{\bE}{\mathbb{E}}
\newcommand{\bF}{\mathbb{F}}
\newcommand{\bG}{\mathbb{G}}
\newcommand{\bK}{\mathbb{K}}
\newcommand{\bM}{\mathbb{M}}
\newcommand{\bN}{\mathbb{N}}
\newcommand{\bO}{\mathbb{O}}
\newcommand{\bP}{\mathbb{P}}
\newcommand{\bR}{\mathbb{R}}
\newcommand{\bV}{\mathbb{V}}
\newcommand{\bZ}{\mathbb{Z}}

\newcommand{\bfE}{\mathbf{E}}
\newcommand{\bfX}{\mathbf{X}}
\newcommand{\bfY}{\mathbf{Y}}
\newcommand{\bfZ}{\mathbf{Z}}

\renewcommand{\O}{\Omega}
\renewcommand{\o}{\omega}
\newcommand{\vp}{\varphi}
\newcommand{\vep}{\varepsilon}

\newcommand{\diag}{{\rm diag}}
\newcommand{\grp}{{\mathsf{G}}}
\newcommand{\dgrp}{{\mathsf{D}}}
\newcommand{\desp}{{\mathsf{D}^{\rm{es}}}}
\newcommand{\Geod}{{\rm Geod}}
\newcommand{\geod}{{\rm geod}}
\newcommand{\hgr}{{\mathsf{H}}}
\newcommand{\mgr}{{\mathsf{M}}}
\newcommand{\ob}{{\rm Ob}}
\newcommand{\obg}{{\rm Ob(\mathsf{G)}}}
\newcommand{\obgp}{{\rm Ob(\mathsf{G}')}}
\newcommand{\obh}{{\rm Ob(\mathsf{H})}}
\newcommand{\Osmooth}{{\Omega^{\infty}(X,*)}}
\newcommand{\ghomotop}{{\rho_2^{\square}}}
\newcommand{\gcalp}{{\mathsf{G}(\mathcal P)}}

\newcommand{\rf}{{R_{\mathcal F}}}
\newcommand{\glob}{{\rm glob}}
\newcommand{\loc}{{\rm loc}}
\newcommand{\TOP}{{\rm TOP}}

\newcommand{\wti}{\widetilde}
\newcommand{\what}{\widehat}

\renewcommand{\a}{\alpha}
\newcommand{\be}{\beta}
\newcommand{\ga}{\gamma}
\newcommand{\Ga}{\Gamma}
\newcommand{\de}{\delta}
\newcommand{\del}{\partial}
\newcommand{\ka}{\kappa}
\newcommand{\si}{\sigma}
\newcommand{\ta}{\tau}
\newcommand{\lra}{{\longrightarrow}}
\newcommand{\ra}{{\rightarrow}}
\newcommand{\rat}{{\rightarrowtail}}
\newcommand{\ovset}[1]{\overset {#1}{\ra}}
\newcommand{\ovsetl}[1]{\overset {#1}{\lra}}
\newcommand{\hr}{{\hookrightarrow}}

%\usepackage{geometry, amsmath,amssymb,latexsym,enumerate}
%\usepackage{xypic}

\def\baselinestretch{1.1}


\hyphenation{prod-ucts}

%\geometry{textwidth= 16 cm, textheight=21 cm}

\newcommand{\sqdiagram}[9]{$$ \diagram #1 \rto^{#2} \dto_{#4}&
#3 \dto^{#5} \\ #6 \rto_{#7} & #8 \enddiagram
\eqno{\mbox{#9}}$$ }

\def\C{C^{\ast}}

\newcommand{\labto}[1]{\stackrel{#1}{\longrightarrow}}

%\newenvironment{proof}{\noindent {\bf Proof} }{ \hfill $\Box$
%{\mbox{}}

\newcommand{\quadr}[4]{\begin{pmatrix} & #1& \\[-1.1ex] #2 & & #3\\[-1.1ex]& #4&
\end{pmatrix}}
\def\D{\mathsf{D}}

\begin{document}

 \begin{definition} A {\em weak Hopf $C^*$-algebra} is defined as a weak Hopf algebra which admits a
faithful $*$--representation on a \htmladdnormallink{Hilbert space}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/NormInducedByInnerProduct.html}. The weak C*--Hopf algebra is therefore much more likely to be closely related to a `\htmladdnormallink{quantum groupoid}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/WeakHopfAlgebra.html}' than the weak Hopf algebra. However, one can argue that \htmladdnormallink{locally compact groupoids}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/LocallyCompactGroupoid.html} equipped with a \htmladdnormallink{Haar measure}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/HigherDimensionalQuantumAlgebroid.html} are even closer to defining quantum groupoids. There are already several, significant examples that motivate the consideration of weak C*-Hopf algebras which also deserve mentioning in the context of `standard' \htmladdnormallink{quantum theories}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/QuantumOperatorAlgebra5.html}. Furthermore, notions such as (proper) \emph{weak C*-algebroids} can provide the main framework for symmetry breaking and \htmladdnormallink{quantum gravity}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/LQG2.html} that we are considering here. Thus, one may consider the quasi-group symmetries constructed by means of special transformations of the ``coordinate space'' $M$.
\end{definition}


\textbf{Remark}:
Recall that the weak Hopf algebra is defined as the extension of a \htmladdnormallink{Hopf algebra}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/QuantumOperatorAlgebra5.html} by weakening the definining axioms of a Hopf algebra as follows~:

\begin{itemize}
\item[(1)] The comultiplication is not necessarily unit-preserving.


\item[(2)] The counit $\vep$ is not necessarily a \htmladdnormallink{homomorphism}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/TrivialGroupoid.html} of algebras.

\item[(3)] The axioms for the antipode map $S : A \lra A$ with respect to the
counit are as follows. For all $h \in H$,
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned} m(\ID \otimes S) \Delta (h) &= (\vep \otimes
\ID)(\Delta (1) (h \otimes 1)) \\ m(S \otimes \ID) \Delta (h) &=
(\ID \otimes \vep)((1 \otimes h) \Delta(1)) \\ S(h) &= S(h_{(1)})
h_{(2)} S(h_{(3)}) ~.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\end{itemize}

These axioms may be appended by the following \htmladdnormallink{commutative diagrams}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Commutativity.html}
\begin{equation}
{\begin{CD} A \otimes A @> S\otimes \ID >> A \otimes A
\\ @A \Delta AA @VV m V
\\ A @ > u \circ \vep >> A
\end{CD}} \qquad
{\begin{CD} A \otimes A @> \ID\otimes S >> A \otimes A
\\ @A \Delta AA @VV m V
\\ A @ > u \circ \vep >> A
\end{CD}}
\end{equation}
along with the counit axiom:
\begin{equation}
\xymatrix@C=3pc@R=3pc{ A \otimes A \ar[d]_{\vep \otimes 1} & A
\ar[l]_{\Delta} \ar[dl]_{\ID_A} \ar[d]^{\Delta}
\\ A & A \otimes A \ar[l]^{1 \otimes \vep}}
\end{equation}

Some authors substitute the term \emph{quantum `groupoid'} for a weak Hopf algebra.

\subsection{Examples of weak Hopf C*-algebra.}
\begin{itemize}

\item[(1)]

In Nikshych and Vainerman (2000) quantum groupoids were considered as weak
C*--Hopf algebras and were studied in relationship to the
\htmladdnormallink{noncommutative}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/AbelianCategory3.html} symmetries of depth 2 von Neumann subfactors. If
\begin{equation}
A \subset B \subset B_1 \subset B_2 \subset \ldots
\end{equation}
is the Jones extension induced by a finite index depth $2$
inclusion $A \subset B$ of $II_1$ factors, then $Q= A' \cap B_2$
admits a quantum groupoid structure and acts on $B_1$, so that $B
= B_1^{Q}$ and $B_2 = B_1 \rtimes Q$~. Similarly, in Rehren (1997)
`\htmladdnormallink{paragroups}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Paragroups.html}' (derived from weak C*--Hopf algebras) comprise
(quantum) \htmladdnormallink{groupoids}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/QuantumOperatorAlgebra5.html} of equivalence classes such as associated with
6j--symmetry \htmladdnormallink{groups}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/TrivialGroupoid.html} (relative to a fusion rules algebra). They
correspond to \htmladdnormallink{type}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Bijective.html} $II$ von Neumann algebras in \htmladdnormallink{quantum mechanics}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/QuantumParadox.html},
and arise as symmetries where the local subfactors (in the sense
of containment of \htmladdnormallink{observables}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/QuantumSpinNetworkFunctor2.html} within \htmladdnormallink{fields}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/CosmologicalConstant.html}) have depth $2$ in the
Jones extension. Related is how a von Neumann algebra $N$, such as
of finite index depth $2$, sits inside a weak Hopf algebra formed as
the crossed product $N \rtimes A$ (B\"ohm et al. 1999).

\item[(2)]
In Mack and Schomerus (1992) using a more general notion of the
Drinfeld construction, develop the notion of a \emph{quasi
triangular quasi--Hopf algebra} (QTQHA) is developed with the aim
of studying a range of essential symmetries with special
properties, such the \htmladdnormallink{quantum group}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/QuantumGroup4.html} algebra $\U_q (\rm{sl}_2)$ with
$\vert q \vert =1$~. If $q^p=1$, then it is shown that a QTQHA is
canonically associated with $\U_q (\rm{sl}_2)$. Such QTQHAs are
claimed as the true symmetries of minimal conformal field
theories.
\end{itemize}


\subsection {Von Neumann Algebras (or $W^*$-algebras).}

Let $\H$ denote a complex (separable) Hilbert space. A \emph{von
Neumann algebra} $\A$ acting on $\H$ is a subset of the $*$--algebra of
all bounded \htmladdnormallink{operators}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/QuantumOperatorAlgebra4.html} $\cL(\H)$ such that:

\begin{itemize}

\item[(1)] $\A$ is closed under the adjoint \htmladdnormallink{operation}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Cod.html} (with the
adjoint of an element $T$ denoted by $T^*$).


\item[(2)]
$\A$ equals its bicommutant, namely:

\begin{equation}
\A= \{A \in \cL(\H) : \forall B \in \cL(\H), \forall C\in \A,~
(BC=CB)\Rightarrow (AB=BA)\}~.
\end{equation}
\end{itemize}

If one calls a \emph{commutant} of a set $\A$ the special set of
bounded operators on $\cL(\H)$ which \htmladdnormallink{commute}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Commutator.html} with all elements in
$\A$, then this second condition implies that the commutant of the
commutant of $\A$ is again the set $\A$.

On the other hand, a von Neumann algebra $\A$ inherits a
\emph{unital} subalgebra from $\cL(\H)$, and according to the
first condition in its definition $\A$ does indeed inherit a
\emph{*-subalgebra} structure, as further explained in the next
\htmladdnormallink{section}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/IsomorphicObjectsUnderAnIsomorphism.html} on \htmladdnormallink{C*-algebras}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/VonNeumannAlgebra2.html}. Furthermore, we have the notable
\emph{Bicommutant \htmladdnormallink{theorem}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Formula.html}} which states that $\A$ \emph{is a von
Neumann algebra if and only if $\A$ is a *-subalgebra of
$\cL(\H)$, closed for the smallest topology defined by continuous
maps $(\xi,\eta)\longmapsto (A\xi,\eta)$ for all $<A\xi,\eta)>$
where $<.,.>$ denotes the \htmladdnormallink{inner product}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/NormInducedByInnerProduct.html} defined on $\H$}~. For
further instruction on this subject, see e.g. Aflsen and Schultz
(2003), Connes (1994). \\

Commutative and noncommutative Hopf algebras form the backbone of
quantum `groups' and are essential to the generalizations of
symmetry. Indeed, in most respects a quantum `group' is identifiable
with a Hopf algebra. When such algebras are actually
associated with proper groups of \htmladdnormallink{matrices}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Matrix.html} there is
considerable scope for their \htmladdnormallink{representations}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/CategoricalGroupRepresentation.html} on both finite
and infinite dimensional Hilbert spaces.


\begin{thebibliography}{9}

\bibitem{AS}
E. M. Alfsen and F. W. Schultz: \emph{Geometry of State Spaces of Operator Algebras}, Birkh\"auser, Boston--Basel--Berlin (2003).

\bibitem{ICB71}
I. Baianu : Categories, Functors and Automata Theory: A Novel Approach to Quantum Automata through Algebraic--Topological Quantum Computations., \textit{Proceed. 4th Intl. Congress LMPS}, (August-Sept. 1971).

\bibitem{BGB07}
I. C. Baianu, J. F. Glazebrook and R. Brown.: A Non--Abelian, Categorical Ontology of Spacetimes and Quantum Gravity., \emph{Axiomathes} \textbf{17},(3-4): 353-408(2007).

\bibitem{BBGGk8}
I.C.Baianu, R. Brown J.F. Glazebrook, and G. Georgescu, Towards Quantum Non--Abelian Algebraic Topology. \textit{in preparation}, (2008).

\bibitem{BSS}
F.A. Bais, B. J. Schroers and J. K. Slingerland: Broken quantum symmetry and confinement phases in planar physics, \emph{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{89} No. 18 (1--4): 181--201 (2002).

\bibitem{BRM2k3}
M. R. Buneci.: \emph{Groupoid Representations}, Ed. Mirton: Timishoara (2003).

\bibitem{Chaician}
M. Chaician and A. Demichev: \emph{Introduction to Quantum Groups}, World Scientific (1996).

\bibitem{CF}
L. Crane and I.B. Frenkel. Four-dimensional topological quantum field theory, Hopf categories, and the canonical bases. Topology and physics. \textit{J. Math. Phys}. \textbf{35} (no. 10): 5136--5154 (1994).

\bibitem{Drinfeld}
V. G. Drinfel'd: Quantum groups, In \emph{Proc. Intl. Congress of
Mathematicians, Berkeley 1986}, (ed. A. Gleason), Berkeley, 798-820 (1987).

\bibitem{Ellis}
G. J. Ellis: Higher dimensional crossed modules of algebras,
\emph{J. of Pure Appl. Algebra} \textbf{52} (1988), 277-282.

\bibitem{Etingof1}
P.. I. Etingof and A. N. Varchenko, Solutions of the Quantum Dynamical Yang-Baxter Equation and Dynamical Quantum Groups, \emph{Comm.Math.Phys.}, \textbf{196}: 591-640 (1998).

\bibitem{Etingof2}
P. I. Etingof and A. N. Varchenko: Exchange dynamical quantum groups, \emph{Commun. Math. Phys.} \textbf{205} (1): 19-52 (1999)

\bibitem{Etingof3}
P. I. Etingof and O. Schiffmann: Lectures on the dynamical Yang--Baxter equations, in \emph{Quantum Groups and Lie Theory (Durham, 1999)}, pp. 89-129, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.

\bibitem{Fauser2002}
B. Fauser: \emph{A treatise on quantum Clifford Algebras}. Konstanz, Habilitationsschrift. \\ arXiv.math.QA/0202059 (2002).

\bibitem{Fauser2004}
B. Fauser: Grade Free product Formulae from Grassman--Hopf Gebras. Ch. 18 in R. Ablamowicz, Ed., \emph{Clifford Algebras: Applications to Mathematics, Physics and Engineering}, Birkh\"{a}user: Boston, Basel and Berlin, (2004).

\bibitem{Fell}
J. M. G. Fell.: The Dual Spaces of C*--Algebras., \emph{Transactions of the American
Mathematical Society}, \textbf{94}: 365--403 (1960).

\bibitem{FernCastro}
F.M. Fernandez and E. A. Castro.: \emph{(Lie) Algebraic Methods in Quantum Chemistry and Physics.}, Boca Raton: CRC Press, Inc (1996).

\bibitem{Feynman}
R. P. Feynman: Space--Time Approach to Non--Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, {\em Reviews
of Modern Physics}, 20: 367--387 (1948). [It is also reprinted in (Schwinger 1958).]

\bibitem{frohlich:nonab}
A.~Fr{\"o}hlich: Non--Abelian Homological Algebra. {I}.
{D}erived functors and satellites.\/, \emph{Proc. London Math. Soc.}, \textbf{11}(3): 239--252 (1961).

\bibitem{GR02}
R. Gilmore: \emph{Lie Groups, Lie Algebras and Some of Their Applications.},
Dover Publs., Inc.: Mineola and New York, 2005.

\bibitem{Hahn1}
P. Hahn: Haar measure for measure groupoids., \textit{Trans. Amer. Math. Soc}. \textbf{242}: 1--33(1978).

\bibitem{Hahn2}
P. Hahn: The regular representations of measure groupoids., \textit{Trans. Amer. Math. Soc}. \textbf{242}:34--72(1978).

\bibitem{HeynLifsctz}
R. Heynman and S. Lifschitz. 1958. \emph{Lie Groups and Lie Algebras}., New York and London: Nelson Press.

\bibitem{Vainerman2003}
Leonid Vainerman. 2003.
\htmladdnormallink{\emph{Locally Compact Quantum Groups and Groupoids: Proceedings of the Meeting of Theoretical Physicists and Mathematicians}.}{http://planetmath.org/?op=getobj&from=books&id=160}, Strasbourg, February 21-23, 2002., Walter de Gruyter Gmbh \& Co: Berlin.

\end{thebibliography} 

\end{document}