Talk:PlanetPhysics/Multigrade Operator
Add topicOriginal TeX Content from PlanetPhysics Archive
[edit source]%%% This file is part of PlanetPhysics snapshot of 2011-09-01 %%% Primary Title: multigrade operator %%% Primary Category Code: 02. %%% Filename: MultigradeOperator.tex %%% Version: 1 %%% Owner: Jon Awbrey %%% Author(s): Jon Awbrey %%% PlanetPhysics is released under the GNU Free Documentation License. %%% You should have received a file called fdl.txt along with this file. %%% If not, please write to gnu@gnu.org. \documentclass[12pt]{article} \pagestyle{empty} \setlength{\paperwidth}{8.5in} \setlength{\paperheight}{11in}
\setlength{\topmargin}{0.00in} \setlength{\headsep}{0.00in} \setlength{\headheight}{0.00in} \setlength{\evensidemargin}{0.00in} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0.00in} \setlength{\textwidth}{6.5in} \setlength{\textheight}{9.00in} \setlength{\voffset}{0.00in} \setlength{\hoffset}{0.00in} \setlength{\marginparwidth}{0.00in} \setlength{\marginparsep}{0.00in} \setlength{\parindent}{0.00in} \setlength{\parskip}{0.15in}
\usepackage{html}
% This is the default PlanetPhysics preamble. % as your knowledge of TeX increases, you % will probably want to edit this, but it % should be fine as is for beginners.
% Almost certainly you want these:
\usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amsfonts}
% Used for TeXing text within EPS files:
\usepackage{psfrag}
% Need this for including graphics (\includegraphics):
\usepackage{graphicx}
% For neatly defining theorems and propositions:
%\usepackage{amsthm}
% Making logically defined graphics:
%\usepackage{xypic}
% There are many more packages, add them here as you need them.
% define commands here
\begin{document}
A \textbf{multigrade operator} $\Omega$ is a \htmladdnormallink{parametric operator}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/ParametricOperator.html} with \htmladdnormallink{parameter}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Parameter.html} $k$ in the set $\mathbb{N}$ of non-negative integers.
The application of a multigrade operator $\Omega$ to a finite sequence of operands $(x_1, \ldots, x_k)$ is typically denoted with the parameter $k$ left tacit, as the appropriate application is implicit in the number of operands listed. Thus $\Omega(x_1, \ldots, x_k)$ may be taken for $\Omega_k(x_1, \ldots, x_k).$
\end{document}