Talk:PlanetPhysics/Minkowski's Four Dimensional Space

Original TeX Content from PlanetPhysics Archive

%%% This file is part of PlanetPhysics snapshot of 2011-09-01
%%% Primary Title: Minkowski's Four-Dimensional Space
%%% Primary Category Code: 03.30.+p
%%% Filename: MinkowskisFourDimensionalSpace.tex
%%% Version: 3
%%% Owner: bloftin
%%% Author(s): bloftin
%%% PlanetPhysics is released under the GNU Free Documentation License.
%%% You should have received a file called fdl.txt along with this file.        
%%% If not, please write to gnu@gnu.org.
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\pagestyle{empty}
\setlength{\paperwidth}{8.5in}
\setlength{\paperheight}{11in}

\setlength{\topmargin}{0.00in}
\setlength{\headsep}{0.00in}
\setlength{\headheight}{0.00in}
\setlength{\evensidemargin}{0.00in}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0.00in}
\setlength{\textwidth}{6.5in}
\setlength{\textheight}{9.00in}
\setlength{\voffset}{0.00in}
\setlength{\hoffset}{0.00in}
\setlength{\marginparwidth}{0.00in}
\setlength{\marginparsep}{0.00in}
\setlength{\parindent}{0.00in}
\setlength{\parskip}{0.15in}

\usepackage{html}

% this is the default PlanetMath preamble.  as your knowledge
% of TeX increases, you will probably want to edit this, but
% it should be fine as is for beginners.

% almost certainly you want these
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}

% used for TeXing text within eps files
%\usepackage{psfrag}
% need this for including graphics (\includegraphics)
%\usepackage{graphicx}
% for neatly defining theorems and propositions
%\usepackage{amsthm}
% making logically defined graphics
%\usepackage{xypic}

% there are many more packages, add them here as you need them

% define commands here

\begin{document}

 \subsection{Minkowski's Four-Dimensional Space}
From \htmladdnormallink{Relativity: The Special and General Theory}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/SpecialTheoryOfRelativity.html} by \htmladdnormallink{Albert Einstein}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/AlbertEinstein.html}
The non-mathematician is seized by a mysterious shuddering when he
hears of ``four-dimensional" things, by a feeling not unlike that
awakened by thoughts of the occult. And yet there is no more
common-place statement than that the world in which we live is a
four-dimensional space-time continuum.

Space is a three-dimensional continuum. By this we mean that it is
possible to describe the position of a point (at rest) by means of
three numbers (coordinates) $x, y, z$, and that there is an indefinite
number of points in the neighbourhood of this one, the position of
which can be described by coordinates such as $x_1, y_1, z_1$, which
may be as near as we choose to the respective values of the
coordinates $x, y, z$, of the first point. In virtue of the latter
property we speak of a ``continuum," and owing to the fact that there
are three coordinates we speak of it as being ``three-dimensional."

Similarly, the world of physical phenomena which was briefly called
``world" by Minkowski is naturally four dimensional in the space-time
sense. For it is composed of individual events, each of which is
described by four numbers, namely, three space coordinates $x, y, z$,
and a time coordinate, the time value $t$. The ``world" is in this sense
also a continuum; for to every event there are as many ``neighbouring"
events (realised or at least thinkable) as we care to choose, the
coordinates $x_1, y_1, z_1, t_1$ of which differ by an indefinitely
small amount from those of the event $x, y, z, t$ originally considered.
That we have not been accustomed to regard the world in this sense as
a four-dimensional continuum is due to the fact that in physics,
before the advent of the theory of relativity, time played a different
and more independent role, as compared with the space coordinates. It
is for this reason that we have been in the habit of treating time as
an independent continuum. As a matter of fact, according to classical
mechanics, time is absolute, {\it i.e.} it is independent of the position
and the condition of motion of the system of coordinates. We see this
expressed in the last equation of the Galileian transformation ($t' =
t$)

The four-dimensional mode of consideration of the ``world" is natural
on the theory of relativity, since according to this theory time is
robbed of its independence. This is shown by the fourth equation of
the Lorentz transformation:

$$t' = \frac{t-\frac{v}{c^2}x}{\sqrt{I-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$$
~

Moreover, according to this equation the time difference $\Delta t'$ of two
events with respect to $K'$ does not in general vanish, even when the
time difference $\Delta t'$ of the same events with reference to $K$ vanishes.
Pure ``space-distance'' of two events with respect to $K$ results in
``time-distance'' of the same events with respect to $K'$. But the
discovery of Minkowski, which was of importance for the formal
development of the theory of relativity, does not lie here. It is to
be found rather in the fact of his recognition that the
four-dimensional \htmladdnormallink{space-time}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/SR.html} continuum of the theory of relativity, in
its most essential formal properties, shows a pronounced relationship
to the three-dimensional continuum of Euclidean geometrical
space.\footnotemark \ In order to give due prominence to this relationship,
however, we must replace the usual time coordinate $t$ by an imaginary
\htmladdnormallink{magnitude}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/AbsoluteMagnitude.html} $\sqrt{-I}ct$ proportional to it. Under these conditions, the
natural laws satisfying the demands of the (special) theory of
relativity assume mathematical forms, in which the time coordinate
plays exactly the same role as the three space coordinates. Formally,
these four coordinates correspond exactly to the three space
coordinates in Euclidean geometry. It must be clear even to the
non-mathematician that, as a consequence of this purely formal
addition to our knowledge, the theory perforce gained clearness in no
mean measure.

These inadequate remarks can give the reader only a vague notion of
the important idea contributed by Minkowski. Without it the \htmladdnormallink{general theory}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/GeneralTheory.html} of relativity, of which the fundamental ideas are developed in
the following pages, would perhaps have got no farther than its long
clothes. Minkowski's \htmladdnormallink{work}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Work.html} is doubtless difficult of access to anyone
inexperienced in mathematics, but since it is not necessary to have a
very exact grasp of this work in order to understand the fundamental
ideas of either the special or the general theory of relativity, I
shall leave it here at present, and revert to it only towards the end
of Part 2.


\footnotetext{Cf. the somewhat more detailed discussion in Appendix II.}



\subsection{References}
This article is derived from the Einstein Reference Archive (marxists.org) 1999, 2002. \htmladdnormallink{Einstein Reference Archive}{http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/einstein/index.htm} which is under the FDL copyright.

\end{document}