Talk:PlanetPhysics/Compton Effect

Original TeX Content from PlanetPhysics Archive

%%% This file is part of PlanetPhysics snapshot of 2011-09-01 %%% Primary Title: Compton effect %%% Primary Category Code: 32.80.Cy %%% Filename: ComptonEffect.tex %%% Version: 5 %%% Owner: bloftin %%% Author(s): bloftin %%% PlanetPhysics is released under the GNU Free Documentation License. %%% You should have received a file called fdl.txt along with this file. %%% If not, please write to gnu@gnu.org. \documentclass[12pt]{article} \pagestyle{empty} \setlength{\paperwidth}{8.5in} \setlength{\paperheight}{11in}

\setlength{\topmargin}{0.00in} \setlength{\headsep}{0.00in} \setlength{\headheight}{0.00in} \setlength{\evensidemargin}{0.00in} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0.00in} \setlength{\textwidth}{6.5in} \setlength{\textheight}{9.00in} \setlength{\voffset}{0.00in} \setlength{\hoffset}{0.00in} \setlength{\marginparwidth}{0.00in} \setlength{\marginparsep}{0.00in} \setlength{\parindent}{0.00in} \setlength{\parskip}{0.15in}

\usepackage{html}

% this is the default PlanetMath preamble. as your knowledge % of TeX increases, you will probably want to edit this, but % it should be fine as is for beginners.

% almost certainly you want these \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amsfonts}

% used for TeXing text within eps files %\usepackage{psfrag} % need this for including graphics (\includegraphics) \usepackage{graphicx} % for neatly defining theorems and propositions %\usepackage{amsthm} % making logically defined graphics %\usepackage{xypic}

% there are many more packages, add them here as you need them

% define commands here

\begin{document}

The Compton effect represents another confirmation of the photon theory, and a refutation of the \htmladdnormallink{wave}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/CosmologicalConstant2.html} theory. One observes it (Compton, 1924) in the scattering of \htmladdnormallink{X-rays}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/FluorescenceCrossCorrelationSpectroscopy.html} by free (or weakly bound) electrons. The wavelength of the scattered \htmladdnormallink{radiation}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Cyclotron.html} exceeds that of the incident radiation. The difference $\triangle \lambda$ varies as a \htmladdnormallink{function}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Bijective.html} of the angle $\theta$ between the direction of propagation of the incident radiation and the direction along which one observes the scattered light, according to Compton's \htmladdnormallink{formula}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Formula.html}:

\begin{equation} \triangle \lambda = 2 \frac{h}{mc} \sin^2 \frac{\theta}{2} \end{equation}

where $m$ is the rest \htmladdnormallink{mass}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Mass.html} of the electron. One notes that $\triangle \lambda$ is independent of the incident wavelength. Compton and Debye have shown that the Compton effect is a simple elastic \htmladdnormallink{collision}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Collision.html} between a photon of the incident light and one of the electrons of the irradiated target.

In order to discuss this corpuscular interpretation it is convenient to state a few properties of photons which derive directly from \htmladdnormallink{Einstein's}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/AlbertEinstein.html} hypothesis. Since they possess the \htmladdnormallink{velocity}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Velocity.html} $c$,photons are \htmladdnormallink{particles}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Particle.html} of zero mass. The \htmladdnormallink{momentum}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Momentum.html} $p$ and the \htmladdnormallink{energy}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/CosmologicalConstant.html} $\epsilon$ of a photon are thus connected by the \htmladdnormallink{relation}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Bijective.html} \begin{equation} \epsilon = p c \end{equation}

Consider a plane, monochromatic light wave

$$ exp \left [2 \pi i \left ( \frac{\mathbf{u} \cdot \mathbf{r}}{\lambda} - vt \right ) \right ]$$

$\mathbf{u}$ is a \htmladdnormallink{unit vector}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/PureState.html} in the direction of propagation, $\lambda$ is the wavelength, $v$ the frequency: $\lambda v = c$. In accordance with Einstein's hypothesis, this wave represents a stream of photons of energy $hv$. The momentum of these photons is evidently directed along $\mathbf{u}$ and its absolute value, according to (2), is equal to

$$p = \frac{h v}{c} = \frac{h}{\lambda}$$

This relation is a special case of the relation of L. de Broglie. It is often convenient to introduce the angular frequency $\omega = 2 \pi v$ and the wave \htmladdnormallink{vector}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Vectors.html} $\mathbf{k}=(2\pi/\lambda)\mathbf{u}$ of he plane wave. The connecting relations are then written:

\begin{equation} \epsilon = \hbar \omega, \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \mathbf{p}=\hbar \mathbf{k} \end{equation}

The corpuscular theory of the Compton effect consists in writing down that the total energy and momentum are conserved in the elastic collision between the incident photon and the electron. Let $\mathbf{p},\mathbf{p^{\prime}}$ be the initial and final momenta of the photon, respectively, $\mathbf{P^{\prime}}$ the recoil momentum of the electron after collision (Figure 1).

\begin{center} \includegraphics[scale=1]{ComptonEffect.eps} \vspace{20 pt} \textbf{Figure 1}: Compton collision of a photon with an electron at rest \end{center}

The conservation equations are written

\begin{eqnarray} \mathbf{p}=\mathbf{p^{\prime}} + \mathbf{P^{\prime}}, \nonumber \\ mc^2 + pc = \sqrt{P^{\prime 2} c^2 + m^2c^4} + p^{\prime}c \end{eqnarray}

According to these equations the collision is completely defined once the initial conditions and the direction of emission of the scattered photon are known. Taking into account the relations in (3), one can easily deduce the Compton formula which is thus explained theoretically. Since the first \htmladdnormallink{work}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Work.html} of Compton, all the other predictions of this theory have been confirmed experimentally. The recoil electrons have been observed and the law of their energy variation as a function of the angle of emission $\phi$ is just the one which one derives from equations (4). Coincidence experiments have shown that the scattered photon and electron are emitted simultaneously, and that the correlation between the emission angles $\theta$ and $\phi$ agrees with the theory.

\subsection{References}

[1] Messiah, Albert. "\htmladdnormallink{Quantum mechanics}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/QuantumParadox.html}: \htmladdnormallink{volume}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Volume.html} I." Amsterdam, North-Holland Pub. Co.; New York, Interscience Publishers, 1961-62.

This entry is a derivative of the Public \htmladdnormallink{domain}{http://planetphysics.us/encyclopedia/Bijective.html} work [1].

\end{document}