Talk:History/History as creative writing

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The selections on the attached resource subpage were made by User:Glimmerguard and were originally in mainspace as an unlinked document; "History as creative writing". I have not verified the accuracy of the texts. This page may be further edited to push the documents to subpages, so that the page is much smaller. I also removed categories from the page, it was in Category:Physics, Category:Mathematics, and Category:Philosophy. −Abd (discusscontribs) 00:24, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links[edit source]

(Moved from resource page), note by Abd (discusscontribs) 15:51, 2 January 2014 (UTC).)[reply]

Please do not remove these external links from this article.

External Links

http://plato.stanford.edu/about.html

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/

http://www.silive.com/advance/

http://unu.edu/

http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Internal/191086/142227/members/

http://www.vaticanlibrary.va/home.php?pag=sale_di_consultazione

http://www.orderofmalta.int/history/680/the-79-grand-masters/?lang=en

http://www.interpol.int/Public/icpo/governance/sg/history.asp

http://wbi.worldbank.org/wbi/scholarships

For any concerns about this can I refer you to: https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Request_custodian_action

Thanks. Unsigned. Added by Glimmerguard, 13:27, 2 January 2014‎

  • Please don't add personal notes and requests to a resource, but discuss on the attached discussion page. The links were removed with a request to discuss before adding them, but, instead, the user went to the Request Custodian Action page, as linked. Please discuss before requesting custodian action. The RCA notice did not actually request any custodian action, and the only response (so far) was not related to this mainspace activity.
  • Glimmerguard, if you would prefer to have an essay be untouched, it can be linked as such, and your preference would generally be respected. It would need to be signed, attributed to you, and neutrally placed. Not just presented as if it were knowledge by consensus. —Abd (discusscontribs) 15:51, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]