Talk:Educational Media Awareness Campaign/Chemistry/POTD 1

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Though my subject isn't Chemistry, I think: in the future of our tertiary education, we need some suggestions from the specialist persons longitudinally; meanwhile, we also need the generalist persons' advices from multiple-disciplinary. Might be, this article contents limited values; however, let us have a try to discuss and develop more with curiosity. In my opinion, about the Periodic Table, there are still a great amount of question in the root we can make out, even nowadays:


Is the description of this element stated in this table the normal situation? how many are? how many aren't from their nature?[edit source]

We say that: 'a number of unstable, radioactive elements have been made in recent year by scientists from a variety countries'. Sometimes, they can merely be purified out in laboratory. However, they aren't disappeared under normal conditions. Then, where are they and what are their natures? are they still alive but companying with other elements or as the vital parts of a huge systematic mechanism? Then, could we open our eyes to search the universe and find somewhere - Mars, magma, Northern Pole, sun, binary stars, black holes, or somewhere else, in which there are rich sources of them existing purely? How could us research, manage, predict and control their properties exactly for serving ourselves? How could use motivate their functions out?

Source:[edit source]

Ann & Patrick Fullick. Heimemann Educational Publishers. Oxford. 1994. pp.132-140 ISBN 0435570803


New ideas about the patterns of electrons[edit source]

We knew that electrons are travelling so fast as light. Thereby, we can't really know where they are really locating themselves. However, one matter, from the mass statistics, their electrons are ordered following certain orders from near the nuclear to far; meanwhile, they are circling in their own orbits (channel). Then, we can draw out the patterns accordingly. However, these accounts should be in the static states. We have never really touch them and their movements. Based on the static states, we constructed our chemistry-empire. Then, when they are moving fast as lights (they are dynamically moving as photons and must be influenced by space-time) but still following certain unknown pattern (such as Gravitational wave's explanation in Grand Relativity), would some chemical properties have been changed or also contenting sub-periods? Following this logic, about their loss, sharing, increasing in number, can we give some new and dynamic explanations as some properties as waves, as orbiting, as the constellations , and as the binary stars-system and the radioactivity of the black holes. Could we shape our behaviours to exact control the procedures of their loss, sharing and their increasing of number in certain 'channels'. Afterwards, is that to say: to some degrees, we can manage their patterns and even transform matters from one to another - or, it should be from one period to another. Changing another pathway, what about the functions of Protons and neutrons? What about the forces between them and the electrons? could it be compared with the gravitational wave reflected out from binary stars-system? can we really calculate it also from mass-statistics? could the existing of protons and neutrons, somehow, balanced the existing of electrons and its patterns outside?

Source:[edit source]

Ann & Patrick Fullick. Heimemann Educational Publishers. Oxford. 1994. pp. 27 ISBN 0435570803


Heading text[edit source]

Periodic Table should be about periods and the travelling among them[edit source]

Yes, currently, we have known that 'the reactive metals, transition metals, poor metals, metalloids, non-metals and noble gases' are staged existing in matters' huge periodic circling. However, they were gotten on earth (somewhat in laboratory, and others directly in normal situation), but what about somewhere outside? are their expressions the same, or travelling to their next period? Do they have the next period, like water normally having three situation; but can we enhancing the conditions - the gravitational rate, the temperature, the stress etc., then it can have the properties of the reactive metals? can they make this kind of trips? In other words, can one element from one staged category - such as 'reactive metals', when it will be put under other background, it can be shifted to its another period, such as 'Noble gases'. Oppositely, can one element from 'Noble gases' returning back to its original pattern, can reflect out the properties as 'the reactive metals'. Alongside our civilization' growth, nothing is impossible, we are also travelling to our next and the next after this next' period. Periodic Table should be a summarized dynamic 'video' rather than a static 'picture'. Yes, it staged pictured the distribution of every element which we could make senses in certain periods of our history. That is the great contribution of it. However, It should also have left the equal developing zone to every element's progressing further more, as if our tools and techniques can get their developing conditions in the period next. We need to remember ever element has been travelling equally in its certain channel in this Periodic Table. Then, Periodical Table can really move, and be in terms of 'Period'. I thought it should be Mendeleev's purpose of letting it move rather than staying there; and, the dream of ' a snake who is cycling by biting its tail' predicted for us - snake is a living animal can move.

This article is made for our students and teachers' critical thinking of the variety possibilities produced by Periodic Table. Hoping it is helpful.

Sources[edit source]

Ann & Patrick Fullick. Heimemann Educational Publishers. Oxford. 1994. pp. 27, 136-140 ISBN 0435570803

Jason M. C., Han (discusscontribs) 03:02, 6 April 2016 (UTC)Jason M. C., Han[reply]