Open Science/Week 12: Scientific Culture for Quality, Integrity, and Open Science

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Learning Outcomes[edit | edit source]

  • Define the term social dilemma.
  • Identify social dilemmas in the context of open science and propose solutions.
  • Compare the role culture plays in open science and in reproducibility.

Readings[edit | edit source]

Putting Open Science into Practice: A Social Dilemma?” by Scheliga, K., & Friesike, S. in First Monday, 19(9), 2014, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 International License.[1]

Open Science, Communal Culture, and Women’s Participation in the Movement to Improve Science” by Mary C. Murphy, Amanda F. Mejia, Jorge Mejia, Xiaoran Yan, Sapna Cheryan, Nilanjana Dasgupta, Mesmin Destin, Stephanie A. Fryberg, Julie A. Garcia, Elizabeth L. Haines, Judith M. Harackiewicz, Alison Ledgerwood, Corinne A. Moss-Racusin, Lora E. Park, Sylvia P. Perry, Kate A. Ratliff, Aneeta Rattan, Diana T. Sanchez, Krishna Savani, Denise Sekaquaptewa, Jessi L. Smith, Valerie Jones Taylor, Dustin B. Thoman, Daryl A. Wout, Patricia L. Mabry, Susanne Ressl, Amanda B. Diekman, and Franco Pestilli in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117 (39) 24154-24164, September 2020, CC BY-NC-ND.[2] 11 pages.

Optional additional reading for those in the US:

“Accelerating Progress to Open Science by Design” in Open Science by Design: Realizing a Vision for 21st Century Research, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2018, Copyright National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM).[3] See especially pp. 151-153.

Discussion Question[edit | edit source]

Describe an example of a social dilemma in the context of open science. To the extent possible, ground the example in your personal experience. Explain the individual and collective aspects of the dilemma. Offer a proposed solution.  Conclude your post by posing a question for further discussion of your example.

Self-check Questions[edit | edit source]

1 Which of the following are the elements that define a situation as a social dilemma? See “Putting Open Science into Practice: A Social Dilemma?

Each individual is better off by choosing an option that is worse for society overall AND ...If everyone were to choose the option that is best for society, everyone would be better off.
Each individual is better off by choosing an option that is worse for society overall AND ...The best option for an individual depends on the choices made by others.
Each individual is better off by choosing an option that is worse for society overall AND ...The social impact of an individual’s choice can’t be known in advance.
If everyone were to choose the option that is best for society, everyone would be better off AND individuals are unable to communicate about the effects of their choices.

2 Which of the following is an example of an individual constraint in open science? See “Putting Open Science into Practice: A Social Dilemma?

A multinational research team operates under different legal systems controlling data privacy.
A scientist who collects and publishes open data resents another researcher publishing a study using those data.
A scientist is confident that results will be publishable because the study was well-designed and pre-registered. See Figure 1.
Scientists are uncomfortable with the competitive publication culture in their discipline.

3 How can social dilemmas be resolved? Choose the best answer. See “Putting Open Science into Practice: A Social Dilemma?

motivational solutions that take into account the outcomes for everyone involved
strategic solutions based on individual self-interest
structural solutions that change policy and culture
all of the above

4 In “Open Science, Communal Culture, and Women’s Participation in the Movement to Improve Science,” Murphy and colleagues analyzed bibliometric data. Which statement best describes the relationship between the scientific literatures about open science and reproducibility?

The scientific literatures about open science and reproducibility are closely linked, sharing many common papers and authors.
Women play a more prominent role in the open science literature than they do in the reproducibility literature.
The reproducibility literature makes greater use of pro-social and collaborative language than the open science literature does.
Differences between the open science and reproducibility literatures in the use of pro-social language and in women’s roles as authors are explained by the literatures publishing in different disciplines.

5 The authors of “Open Science, Communal Culture, and Women’s Participation in the Movement to Improve Science” recommend that efforts to improve science adopt pro-social norms. What reasons do they offer to support their recommendation? Choose the best answer.

to reflect the reality of the communal nature of science
to recognize the necessity of multidisciplinary team science to address today’s grand challenges
to make science inclusive of people who value prosocial goals
all of the above


  1. Scheliga, Kaja; Friesike, Sascha (2014-08-24). "Putting open science into practice: A social dilemma?". First Monday. doi:10.5210/fm.v19i9.5381. ISSN 1396-0466. https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5381. 
  2. Murphy, Mary C.; Mejia, Amanda F.; Mejia, Jorge; Yan, Xiaoran; Cheryan, Sapna; Dasgupta, Nilanjana; Destin, Mesmin; Fryberg, Stephanie A. et al. (2020-09-29). "Open science, communal culture, and women’s participation in the movement to improve science". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (39): 24154–24164. doi:10.1073/pnas.1921320117. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 32929006. https://www.pnas.org/content/117/39/24154. 
  3. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2018). Open Science by Design: Realizing a Vision for 21st Century Research (in English). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/25116. ISBN 978-0-309-47624-9.