New Zealand Law/Equity
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Express Trusts
[edit | edit source]- Re Beckbessinger
- UEB Industries Pension Plan
- Hall v Guardian Trust
- Re Singh
- Fox v Harvey
Trustees Duties & Powers
[edit | edit source]Statutes
[edit | edit source]Cases
[edit | edit source]- Mendelsohn v Centrepoint Community Trust
- Hunter v Hunter
- Greenwood
- Re Aitken Trusts
- Jones v AMP Perpetual
- Stuart v Farmer
- Te Huango
- Re Mulligan
- Re O’Donaghue
- BNZ v NZ Guardian Trust
- Foreman v Kingstone
Purpose Trusts
[edit | edit source]- Re Filshie
- Re Budgie
Maori Land Trusts
[edit | edit source]Types of Trusts
[edit | edit source]- putea
- ahu whenua
- whanau
- whenua topu
- kai tiaki
Charitable Trusts
[edit | edit source]Statutes
[edit | edit source]- Charitable Trusts Act 1957
- Charities Act 2005
Cases
[edit | edit source]- NZ Society of Accountants v CIR
- CIR v Medical Council
- Bryant Trust Board v Hamilton CC
- Chch Orchestra Trust v Smitham
- Re Twigger
- Centrepoint Community Growth Trust v CIR
- Re Mason
- Morgan v Wgtn City Corp
- Re Palmerston North Halls Trust Board
- Re Collier
- Alacoque v Roche
- Re Centerpoint Community Growth Trust
- Wilson Home Trusts
- Latimer v CIR
Resulting Trusts
[edit | edit source]- Bateman TV v Bateman & Thomas
- General Comms v Development Finance
- Lankshear v ANZ
- Re Beckbessinger
- UEB Industries Pension Plan
- Hall v Guardian Trust
Equitable Compensation
[edit | edit source]- Aquaculture v Green Mussel
- Cook v Evatt
- Downview v First City
- NZ Land Development v Porter
- A-G v Equiticorp
- Chirnside v Fay
Constructive Trusts
[edit | edit source]- AG for H-K v Reid
- Avondale v Haggie
- DFC NZ v Goddard
- Elders Pastoral v BNZ
- Equiticorp v AG
- Equiticorp v Hawkins
- Fortex v Macintosh
- Gilles v Keogh,
- Lankow v Rose
- Lankshear v ANZ
- Powell v Thompson
- Re Newey (Deceased)
Tracing
[edit | edit source]- Claytons Case
- Re Halletts Estate
- Re Ararimu
- Re Registered Securities
Equitable Estoppel
[edit | edit source]- Burberry Mortgage v Hindsbank
- Gold Star Insurance v Gamut
- Prudential v Hawkins
Fiduciaries
[edit | edit source]- Day v Mead
- Elders Pastoral v BNZ
- Coleman v Myers
- Clark Boyce v Mouat
- AG for H-K v Reid
- Avondale v Haggie
- Contractors Bonding v Snee
- Arklow v McLean
Unconscionability
[edit | edit source]- Nichols v Jessup
- O’Connor v Hart
- Contractors Bonding v Snee
- AG for E & W v Reid
Rule against perpetuities
[edit | edit source]- Perpetuities Act 1964
Wills & Administration
[edit | edit source]- Administration Act 1969
- Simultaneous Deaths Act 195
- Succession Law: A Succession (Adjustment) Act NZ Law Commission Report No 39 (1997)
Wills: General
[edit | edit source]- Wills Act 1837
- Re Young
- Re Whyte
- In re Karsten
- Tanner v Public Trusteee
- Re Archibald
- Brown v Pourau
Mutual Wills
[edit | edit source]- Fisher v Mansfield
- Re Newey (Deceased)
Family Protection Act
[edit | edit source]- Family Protection Act 1955
- Lewis v Cotton
- Re McLean
- Williams v Aucutt
- Re Stewart
- Re Williams
Law Reform (Testamentary Promises) Act
[edit | edit source]- Law Reform (Testamentary Promises) Act 1949
- Re Welch
- Rennie v Hamilton
Property (Relationships) Act
[edit | edit source]- Property (Relationships) Act
- Re Williams