New Zealand Law/Criminal/Bail
Appearance
Statutory Provisions
[edit | edit source]Cases
[edit | edit source]B v Police (No 2)
[edit | edit source]- Held
- 1. On appeal of bail, accused must prove:
- - the decision was contrary to principle;
- - the judge took account of irrelevant matters; or
- - the judge was wrong.
- 2. Therefore, new evidence best dealt with as new application.
- 3. Court has to consider:
- - risk of offending while out on bail;
- - risk of absconding;
- - risk of interference with witnesses;
- - delay before trial;
- - need of access to legal counsel.
G v Police
[edit | edit source]- Held
- Primary consideration – the safety of the public.
- Onus on applicant to show why bail should be considered.
- Only evidence admissible at trial should be considered.
R v Fatu (unreported)
[edit | edit source]- Held
- No nexus between curfew and risk of interference with prosecution witness(es).
- Bail, therefore, amended and curfew replaced with geographical constraint.
- BORA right to freedom of movement at issue.