Jump to content

Mathematics for Applied Sciences (Osnabrück 2023-2024)/Part I/Lecture 9/latex

From Wikiversity

\setcounter{section}{9}






\subtitle {Series}

We have seen in the last lecture that one can consider a number in the decimal numeral system, meaning an \extrabracket {infinite} {} {} sequence of digits between \mathcor {} {0} {and} {9} {,} as an increasing sequence of rational numbers. For this, the $n$-th digit after the separator, namely \mathl{z_{-n}}{,} means \mathl{z_{-n} \cdot 10^{-n}}{} and has to be added to the approximation given by the digits before. The sequence of digits describes with the inverse powers of $10$ the difference between the approximating sequence, and the members in the approximating sequence are gained by summing up these differences. This viewpoint leads to the concept of a series.




\inputdefinition
{ }
{

Let \mathl{{ \left( a_k \right) }_{k \in \N }}{} be a sequence of real numbers. The \definitionword {series}{} \mathl{\sum_{ k = 0}^\infty a_{ k }}{} is the sequence \mathl{{ \left( s_n \right) }_{n \in \N }}{} of the \definitionword {partial sums}{}
\mathrelationchaindisplay
{\relationchain
{ s_n }
{ \defeq} { \sum_{ k = 0}^n a_{ k } }
{ } { }
{ } { }
{ } { }
} {}{}{.} If the sequence \mathl{{ \left( s_n \right) }_{n \in \N }}{} converges, then we say that the \definitionword {series converges}{.} In this case, we also write
\mathdisp {\sum_{ k = 0}^\infty a_{ k }} { }
for its limit,

and this limit is called the \definitionword {sum}{} of the series.

}

All concepts for sequences carry over to series if we consider a series \mathl{\sum_{ k = 0}^\infty a_{ k }}{} as the sequence of its partial sums
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ s_n }
{ = }{ \sum_{ k = 0}^n a_{ k } }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{.} Like for sequences, it might happen that the sequence does not start with
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{k }
{ = }{ 0 }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{} but later.




\inputexample{}
{

We want to compute the series
\mathdisp {\sum_{k=1}^\infty { \frac{ 1 }{ k(k+1) } }} { . }
For this, we give a formula for the $n$-th partial sum. We have
\mathrelationchaindisplay
{\relationchain
{ s_n }
{ =} { \sum_{k = 1}^n { \frac{ 1 }{ k(k+1) } } }
{ =} { \sum_{k = 1}^n { \left( { \frac{ 1 }{ k } } - { \frac{ 1 }{ k+1 } } \right) } }
{ =} { 1- { \frac{ 1 }{ n+1 } } }
{ =} { { \frac{ n }{ n+1 } } }
} {}{}{.} This sequence converges to $1$, so that the series converges and its sum equals $1$.

}




\inputfactproof
{Real numbers/Series/Rules/Fact}
{Lemma}
{}
{

\factsituation {Let
\mathdisp {\sum_{ k = 0}^\infty a_{ k } \text{ and } \sum_{ k = 0}^\infty b_{ k }} { }
denote convergent series of real numbers with sums \mathcor {} {s} {and} {t} {} respectively.}
\factsegue {Then the following statements hold.}
\factconclusion {\enumerationtwo {The series \mathl{\sum_{ k = 0}^\infty c_{ k }}{} given by
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ c_k }
{ \defeq }{ a_k+b_k }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{} is also convergent and its sum is \mathl{s+t}{.} } {For
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ r }
{ \in }{ \R }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{} also the series \mathl{\sum_{ k = 0}^\infty d_{ k }}{} given by
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ d_k }
{ \defeq }{ r a_k }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{} is convergent and its sum is $r s$. }}
\factextra {}

}
{See Exercise 9.8 .}





\inputfactproof
{Real_numbers/Series/Cauchy-criterion/Fact}
{Lemma}
{}
{

\factsituation {Let
\mathdisp {\sum_{ k = 0}^\infty a_{ k }} { }
be a series of real numbers.}
\factconclusion {Then the series is convergent if and only if the following \keyword {Cauchy-criterion} {} holds: For every
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{\epsilon }
{ > }{0 }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{} there exists some $n_0$ such that for all
\mathrelationchaindisplay
{\relationchain
{n }
{ \geq} {m }
{ \geq} {n_0 }
{ } { }
{ } { }
} {}{}{} the estimate
\mathrelationchaindisplay
{\relationchain
{ \betrag { \sum_{k = m}^n a_k } }
{ \leq} { \epsilon }
{ } { }
{ } { }
{ } { }
} {}{}{} holds.}
\factextra {}

}
{See Exercise 9.9 .}





\inputfactproof
{Real numbers/Series converges/Summands/Null sequence/Fact}
{Lemma}
{}
{

\factsituation {Let
\mathdisp {\sum_{ k = 0}^\infty a_{ k }} { }
denote a convergent series of real numbers.}
\factconclusion {Then
\mathrelationchaindisplay
{\relationchain
{ \lim_{ k \rightarrow \infty} a_{ k } }
{ =} { 0 }
{ } { }
{ } { }
{ } { }
} {}{}{.}}
\factextra {}
}
{

This follows directly from Lemma 9.4 .

}







\image{ \begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=5.5cm]{\imageinclude {Oresme-Nicole.jpg} }
\end{center}
\imagetext {Nikolaus of Oresme (1330-1382) proved that the harmonic series diverges.} }

\imagelicense { Oresme-Nicole.jpg } {} {Leinad-Z} {Commons} {PD} {}

It is therefore a necessary condition for the convergence of a series that its members form a null sequence. This condition is not sufficient, as the \keyword {harmonic series} {} shows.


\inputexample{}
{

The \definitionword {harmonic series}{} is the series


\mathdisp {\sum^\infty_{k = 1} { \frac{ 1 }{ k } }} { . }
So this series is about the \quotationshort{infinite sum}{} of the unit fractions


\mathdisp {1 + { \frac{ 1 }{ 2 } } + { \frac{ 1 }{ 3 } } + { \frac{ 1 }{ 4 } } + { \frac{ 1 }{ 5 } } + { \frac{ 1 }{ 6 } } + { \frac{ 1 }{ 7 } } + { \frac{ 1 }{ 8 } } + \ldots} { . }
This series diverges: For the $2^{n}$ numbers
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ k }
{ = }{ 2^n +1 , \ldots , 2^{n+1} }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{,} we have
\mathrelationchaindisplay
{\relationchain
{ \sum_{k = 2^n+1}^{ 2^{n+1} } \frac{1}{k} }
{ \geq} { \sum_{k = 2^n+1}^{ 2^{n+1} } \frac{1}{2^{n+1} } }
{ =} { 2^n \frac{1}{2^{n+1} } }
{ =} { \frac{1}{2} }
{ } { }
} {}{}{.} Therefore,
\mathrelationchaindisplay
{\relationchain
{ \sum_{k = 1}^{ 2^{n+1} } \frac{1}{k} }
{ =} {1+ \sum_{i = 0}^n \left( \sum_{k = 2^{i} +1 }^{ 2^{i+1} } \frac{1}{k} \right)}
{ } { }
{ \geq} {1 + (n+1) \frac{1}{2} }
{ } { }
} {}{}{.} Hence, the sequence of the partial sums is unbounded, and so, due to Lemma 9.10 , not convergent.

}






\image{ \begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=5.5cm]{\imageinclude {Harmonischebrueckerp.jpg} }
\end{center}
\imagetext {The divergence of the harmonic series implies that one can construct with equal building bricks an arbitrary large overhang.} }

\imagelicense { Harmonischebrueckerp.jpg } {} {Anton} {de Wikipedia} {CC-by-sa 2.5} {}

The following statement is called \keyword {Leibniz criterion for alternating series} {.}




\inputfaktbeweisnichtvorgefuehrt
{Series/Real numbers/Leibniz criterion/Fact}
{Theorem}
{}
{

\factsituation {Let \mathl{{ \left( x_k \right) }_{k \in \N }}{} be an decreasing null sequence of nonnegative real numbers.}
\factconclusion {Then the series \mathl{\sum_{ k= 0}^\infty (-1)^k x_k}{} converges.}
\factextra {}
}
{Series/Real numbers/Leibniz criterion/Fact/Proof

}






\subtitle {Absolutely convergent series}




\inputdefinition
{ }
{

A series
\mathdisp {\sum_{ k = 0}^\infty a_{ k }} { }
of real numbers is called \definitionword {absolutely convergent}{,} if the series
\mathdisp {\sum_{ k = 0}^\infty \betrag { a_k }} { }

converges.

}




\inputfactproof
{Real series/Absolute convergence and convergence/Fact}
{Lemma}
{}
{

\factsituation {}
\factcondition {An absolutely convergent series of real numbers}
\factconclusion {converges.}
\factextra {}
}
{

Let
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ \epsilon }
{ > }{ 0 }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{} be given. We use the Cauchy-criterion. Since the series converges absolutely, there exists some $n_0$ such that for all
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{n }
{ \geq }{ m }
{ \geq }{ n_0 }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{} the estimate
\mathrelationchaindisplay
{\relationchain
{ \betrag { \sum_{k = m}^n \betrag { a_k } \, } }
{ =} { \sum_{k = m}^n \betrag { a_k } }
{ \leq} { \epsilon }
{ } { }
{ } { }
} {}{}{} holds. Therefore,
\mathrelationchaindisplay
{\relationchain
{ \betrag { \sum_{k = m}^n a_k } }
{ \leq} { \betrag { \sum_{k = m}^n \betrag { a_k } \, } }
{ \leq} { \epsilon }
{ } { }
{ } { }
} {}{}{,} which means the convergence.

}





\inputexample{}
{

A convergent series does not in general converge absolutely, the converse of Lemma 9.9 does not hold. Due to the Leibniz criterion, the \keyword {alternating harmonic series} {}
\mathrelationchaindisplay
{\relationchain
{ \sum_{n = 1}^\infty \frac{ (-1)^{n+1} }{n} }
{ =} { 1 - \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{5} - \ldots }
{ } { }
{ } { }
{ } { }
} {}{}{} converges, and its sum is $\ln 2$, a result we can not prove here. However, the corresponding absolute series is just the harmonic series, which diverges due to Example 9.6 .

}

The following statement is called the \keyword {direct comparison test} {.}




\inputfactproof
{Real series/Direct comparison test/Fact}
{Lemma}
{}
{

\factsituation {}
\factcondition {Let \mathl{\sum_{ k = 0}^\infty b_{ k }}{} be a convergent series of real numbers and \mathl{{ \left( a_k \right) }_{k \in \N }}{} a sequence of real numbers fulfilling
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ \betrag { a_k } }
{ \leq }{ b_k }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{} for all $k$.}
\factconclusion {Then the series
\mathdisp {\sum_{ k = 0}^\infty a_{ k }} { }
is absolutely convergent.}
\factextra {}
}
{

This follows directly from the Cauchy-criterion.

}





\inputexample{}
{

We want to determine whether the series
\mathrelationchaindisplay
{\relationchain
{ \sum_{k = 1}^\infty { \frac{ 1 }{ k^2 } } }
{ =} { 1 + { \frac{ 1 }{ 4 } } + { \frac{ 1 }{ 9 } } + { \frac{ 1 }{ 16 } } + { \frac{ 1 }{ 25 } } + \ldots }
{ } { }
{ } { }
{ } { }
} {}{}{} converges. We use the direct comparison test and Example 9.2 , where we have shown the convergence of \mathl{\sum_{k = 1}^n { \frac{ 1 }{ k(k+1) } }}{.} For
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{k }
{ \geq }{2 }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{} we have
\mathrelationchaindisplay
{\relationchain
{ { \frac{ 1 }{ k^2 } } }
{ \leq} { { \frac{ 1 }{ k(k-1) } } }
{ } { }
{ } { }
{ } { }
} {}{}{.} Hence, \mathl{\sum_{k=2}^\infty { \frac{ 1 }{ k^2 } }}{} converges and therefore also \mathl{\sum_{k=1}^\infty { \frac{ 1 }{ k^2 } }}{.} This does not say much about the exact value of the sum. With much more advanced methods, one can show that this sum equals \mathl{{ \frac{ \pi^2 }{ 6 } }}{.}

}






\subtitle {Geometric series and ratio test}






\image{ \begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=5.5cm]{\imageinclude {Geometric_series_14_square.svg} }
\end{center}
\imagetext {This image illustrates the behavior of the geometric series for
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ x }
{ = }{ { \frac{ 1 }{ 4 } } }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{.} Suppose that the length of the square is $2$. Then we can put the geometric series threetimes inside this square. The area of the three series is ${ \frac{ 4 }{ 3 } }$.} }

\imagelicense { Geometric series 14 square.svg } {} {Melchoir} {Commons} {CC-by-sa 3.0} {}


The series \mathl{\sum_{ k = 0}^\infty x^k}{} is called \keyword {geometric series} {} for
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{x }
{ \in }{ \R }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{,} so this is the sum
\mathdisp {1+x+x^2+x^3+ \ldots} { . }
The convergence depends heavily on the modulus of $x$.




\inputfactproof
{Geometric series/Real/Convergence/Absolutely/Fact}
{Theorem}
{}
{

For all real numbers $x$ with
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ \betrag { x } }
{ < }{1 }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{,} the geometric series \mathl{\sum^\infty_{k = 0} x^k}{} converges absolutely, and the sum equals
\mathrelationchaindisplay
{\relationchain
{ \sum^\infty_{k = 0} x^k }
{ =} { { \frac{ 1 }{ 1-x } } }
{ } { }
{ } { }
{ } { }
} {}{}{.} }
{

For every $x$ and every
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{n }
{ \in }{ \N }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{} we have the relation
\mathrelationchaindisplay
{\relationchain
{ (x-1) { \left(\sum_{ k = 0}^n x^k\right) } }
{ =} { x^{n+1} -1 }
{ } { }
{ } { }
{ } { }
} {}{}{} and hence for the partial sums the relation (for
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ x }
{ \neq }{ 1 }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{} )
\mathrelationchaindisplay
{\relationchain
{ s_n }
{ =} { \sum_{ k = 0}^n x^k }
{ =} { \frac{ x^{n+1} -1}{ x-1 } }
{ } { }
{ } {}
} {}{}{} holds. For \mathl{n \rightarrow \infty}{} and
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ \betrag { x } }
{ < }{ 1 }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{} this converges to
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ \frac{-1}{x-1} }
{ = }{ \frac{1}{1-x} }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{} because of Lemma 8.1 and exercise *****.

}


The following statement is called \keyword {ratio test} {.}




\inputfactproof
{Real series/Ratio test/Fact}
{Theorem}
{}
{

\factsituation {Let
\mathdisp {\sum_{ k = 0}^\infty a_{ k }} { }
be a series of real numbers.}
\factcondition {Suppose there exists a real number $q$ with
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ 0 }
{ \leq }{ q }
{ < }{ 1 }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{,} and a $k_0$ with
\mathrelationchaindisplay
{\relationchain
{ \betrag { { \frac{ a_{k+1} }{ a_k } } } }
{ \leq} { q }
{ } { }
{ } { }
{ } { }
} {}{}{} for all
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ k }
{ \geq }{ k_0 }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{} \extrabracket {in particular
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ a_k }
{ \neq }{0 }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{} for
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ k }
{ \geq }{ k_0 }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{}} {} {.}}
\factconclusion {Then the series \mathl{\sum_{ k = 0}^\infty a_{ k }}{} converges absolutely.}
\factextra {}
}
{

The convergence does not change \extrabracket {though the sum} {} {} when we change finitely many members of the series. Therefore, we can assume
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ k_0 }
{ = }{ 0 }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{.} Moreover, we can assume that all $a_k$ are positive real numbers. Then
\mathrelationchaindisplay
{\relationchain
{ a_k }
{ =} { \frac{a_k}{a_{k-1} } \cdot \frac{a_{k-1} }{a_{k-2} } \cdots \frac{a_1}{a_{0} } \cdot a_0 }
{ \leq} { a_0 \cdot q^k }
{ } { }
{ } { }
} {}{}{.} Hence, the convergence follows from the comparison test and the convergence of the geometric series.

}





\inputexample{}
{






\image{ \begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=5.5cm]{\imageinclude {KochFlake.svg} }
\end{center}
\imagetext {} }

\imagelicense { KochFlake.svg } {} {Wxs} {Commons} {CC-by-sa 3.0} {}

The \keyword {Koch snowflakes} {} are given by the sequence of plane geometric shapes $K_n$, which are defined recursively in the following way: The starting object $K_0$ is an equilateral triangle. The object $K_{n+1}$ is obtained from $K_n$ by replacing in each edge of $K_n$ the third in the middle by the corresponding equilateral triangle showing outside.

Let $A_n$ denote the area and $L_n$ the length of the boundary of the $n$-th Koch snowflake. We want to show that the sequence $A_n$ converges and that the sequence $L_n$ diverges to $\infty$.

The number of edges of $K_n$ is \mathl{3 \cdot 4^n}{,} since in each division step, one edge is replaced by four edges. Their length is \mathl{1/3}{} of the length of a previous edge. Let $r$ denote the base length of the starting equilateral triangle. Then $K_n$ consists of \mathl{3 \cdot 4^n}{} edges of length \mathl{r { \left( { \frac{ 1 }{ 3 } } \right) }^n}{} and the length of all edges of $K_n$ together is
\mathrelationchaindisplay
{\relationchain
{ L_n }
{ =} { 3 \cdot 4^n r { \left( { \frac{ 1 }{ 3 } } \right) }^n }
{ =} { 3 r { \left( { \frac{ 4 }{ 3 } } \right) }^n }
{ } { }
{ } { }
} {}{}{.} Because of
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ { \frac{ 4 }{ 3 } } }
{ > }{ 1 }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{,} this diverges to $\infty$.

When we turn from $K_{n}$ to \mathl{K_{n+1}}{,} there will be for every edge a new triangle whose side length is a third of the edge length. The area of an equilateral triangle with side length $s$ is \mathl{{ \frac{ \sqrt{3} }{ 4 } } s^2}{.} So in the step from \mathl{K_{n}}{} to \mathl{K_{n+1}}{} there are \mathl{3 \cdot 4^{n}}{} triangles added with area
\mathrelationchain
{\relationchain
{ { \frac{ \sqrt{3} }{ 4 } } { \left( { \frac{ 1 }{ 3 } } \right) }^{2(n+1)} r^2 }
{ = }{ { \frac{ \sqrt{3} }{ 4 } } r^2 { \left( { \frac{ 1 }{ 9 } } \right) }^{n+1} }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
{ }{ }
} {}{}{.} The total area of $K_n$ is therefore
\mathrelationchainalign
{\relationchainalign
{ }
{ \,} { { \frac{ \sqrt{3} }{ 4 } } r^2 { \left( 1 + 3 { \frac{ 1 }{ 9 } } + 12 { \left( { \frac{ 1 }{ 9 } } \right) } ^2 + 48 { \left( { \frac{ 1 }{ 9 } } \right) }^3 + \cdots + 3\cdot 4^{n-1} { \left( { \frac{ 1 }{ 9 } } \right) }^{n} \right) } }
{ =} { { \frac{ \sqrt{3} }{ 4 } } r^2 { \left( 1 + { \frac{ 3 }{ 4 } } { \left( { \frac{ 4 }{ 9 } } \right) }^1 + { \frac{ 3 }{ 4 } } { \left( { \frac{ 4 }{ 9 } } \right) }^2 + { \frac{ 3 }{ 4 } } { \left( { \frac{ 4 }{ 9 } } \right) }^3 + \cdots + { \frac{ 3 }{ 4 } } { \left( { \frac{ 4 }{ 9 } } \right) }^{n} \right) } }
{ } { }
{ } { }
} {} {}{.} If we forget the $1$ and the factor \mathl{{ \frac{ 3 }{ 4 } }}{,} which does not change the convergence property, we get in the bracket a partial sum of the geometric series for ${ \frac{ 4 }{ 9 } }$, and this converges.

}