Jump to content

Linear algebra (Osnabrück 2024-2025)/Part I/Lecture 19/refcontrol

From Wikiversity

In the lectures to come we will try to understand a d×d-matrixMDLD/matrix M (an endomorphism) by looking at expressions of the form

anMn+an1Mn1++a2M2+a1M1+a0M0,

where Mi means the i-th matrix product of the matrix with itself, M0being the unit matrix Ed. Such expressions arise by plugging matrices into polynomials. In this lecture, we introduce polynomials and the polynomial ring.



The polynomial ring over a field

The polynomial ring over a fieldMDLD/field K consists of all polynomials

P=a0+a1X+a2X2++anXn,

where aiK, n. It is endowed with componentwise addition and a multiplication, which arises by distributive continuation of the rule

XnXm:=Xn+m.


A polynomial

P=i=0naiXi=a0+a1X+a2X2++anXn

is, formally seen, nothing but the tuple (a0,a1,,an), these numbers are called the coefficient of the polynomial. The polynomials are equal if and only if all their coefficients coincide. The letter X is called the variable of the polynomial ring. In this context, the field K is called the base field of the polynomial ring. Due to the componentwise definition of the addition, we have immediately a commutative group, with the zero polynomial (where all coefficients are 0) as neutral element. The polynomials with ai=0 for all i1 are called constant polynomials, they are simply written as a0.

The way a polynomial is written suggests how the multiplication shall work, the product XnXm is given by the addition of the exponents, thus XnXm:=Xn+m. For arbitrary polynomials, the multiplication arises from this simple multiplication rule by distributive continuation according to the law to multiply "everything with everything“. Explicitly, the multiplication is given by the following rule gegeben:[1]

(i=0naiXi)(j=0majXj)=k=0n+mckXk where ck=r=0karbkr.

The multiplication is associative, commutative, distributive, and the constant polynomial 1 is its neutral element, see Exercise 19.4 . Altogether, we have a commutative ring.MDLD/commutative ring


The degree of a nonzero polynomial

P=a0+a1X+a2X2++anXn

with an0

is n.

We do not define a degree for the zero polynomial. The coefficient an, where n is the degree of the polynomial, is called the leading coefficient of the polynomial. The term anXn is called leading term. A polynomial with leading coefficient 1 is called normed.

The graph of a polynomial function from to of degree 5.


We can plug in (or insert or evaluate at) an element aK, into a polynomial PK[X], by replacing the variable X everywhere by a. This gives a mapping

KK,aP(a),

which we call the polynomial function defined by the polynomial. In general, this mapping is not linear, only the polynomials of the form P=a1X are linear.



Die Division with remainder

Let K be a field. We say that a polynomial TK[X] divides a polynomial PK[X], if there exists a polynomial QK[X] such that

P=TQ.

If P can be divided by T, we also say that P is a multiple of T. In K[X] it is not possible to divide any element by any element 0. This is different from a field, but similar no the integers . However, there is an important substitute, the Euclidean division.


TheoremTheorem 19.4 change

Let K be a fieldMDLD/field and let K[X] be the polynomial ringMDLD/polynomial ring over K. Let P,TK[X] be polynomials with T0. Then there exist unique polynomials Q,RK[X] such that

P=TQ+R and with deg(R)<deg(T) or R=0.

Proof  

We prove the statement about the existence by induction over the degreeMDLD/degree (polynomial) of P. If the degree of T is larger than the degree of P, then Q=0 and R=P is a solution.

Suppose that deg(P)=0. By the remark just made also deg(T)=0 holds, so T is a constant polynomial, and therefore (since T0 and K is a field) Q=P/T and R=0 is a solution.

So suppose now that deg(P)=n and that the statement for smaller degrees is already proven. We write P=anXn++a1X+a0 and T=bkXk++b1X+b0 with an,bk0,kn. Then setting H=anbkXnk we have the relation

P:=PTH=0Xn+(an1anbkbk1)Xn1++(ankanbkb0)Xnk+ank1Xnk1++a0.

The degree of this polynomial P is smaller than n and we can apply the induction hypothesis to it. That means there exist Q and R such that

P=TQ+R and with deg(R)<deg(T) or R=0.

From this we get altogether

P=P+TH=TQ+TH+R=T(Q+H)+R,

so that Q=Q+H and R=R is a solution.

To prove uniqueness, let P=TQ+R=TQ+R, both fulfilling the stated conditions. Then T(QQ)=RR. Since the degree of the difference RR is smaller than deg(T), this implies R=R and so Q=Q.


The polynomial T divides P if and only if the remainder in the Euclidean division is 0. The proof of this theorem is constructive, that is, it describes a method how to perform the Euclidean division effectively. For this, it is necessary to be able to perform the operations in the base field. We give two examples, one over the rational numbers and one over the complex numbers.


We want to apply the Euclidean divisionMDLD/Euclidean division (over )

P=6X3+X+1 divided by T=3X2+2X4.

So we want to divide a polynomial of degree 3 by a polynomial of degree 2, hence the quotient and also the remainder have (at most) degree 1. For the first step, we ask with which term we have to multiply T to achieve that the product and P have the same leading term. This is 2X. The product is

2X(3X2+2X4)=6X3+4X28X.

The difference between P and this product is

6X3+X+1(6X3+4X28X)=4X2+9X+1.

We continue the division by T with this polynomial, which we call P. In order to get coincidence with the leading coefficient we have to multiply T with 43. This yields

43T=43(3X2+2X4)=4X283X+163.

The difference between this and P is therefore

4X2+9X+1(4X283X+163)=353X133.

This is the remainder and altogether we get

6X3+X+1=(3X2+2X4)(2X43)+353X133.

We perform the Euclidean divisionMDLD/Euclidean division (polynomial)

P=(4+3i)X3+X2+5i divided by T=(1+i)X2+X3+2i.

The inverse of 1+i is 1212i, and therefore we have

(4+3i)(1+i)1=(4+3i)(1212i)=2+322i+32i=7212i.

Hence, Q starts with (7212i)X, and we have

((1+i)X2+X3+2i)(7212i)X=(4+3i)X3+(7212i)X2+(192+172i)X

We have to subtract this term from P and we obtain

P((4+3i)X3+(7212i)X2+(192+172i)X)=(52+12i)X2+(192172i)X+5i

We apply the same procedure to this polynomial (which we call P). We compute

(52+12i)(1212i)=1+32i

Therefore, the constant term of Q equals 1+32i, and we obtain

((1+i)X2+X3+2i)(1+32i)=(52+12i)X2+(1+32i)X132i.

We subtract this from P and get

P((52+12i)X2+(1+32i)X132i)=(21210i)X+232i.

This term is the remainder R, the Euclidean division altogether is

(4+3i)X3+X2+5i=((1+i)X2+X3+2i)((7212i)X1+32i)+(21210i)X+232i



Zeroes

A zero of a polynomial P is an element aK such that P(a)=0. A polynomial does not necessarily have zeroes, and this depends also on the base field. The polynomial X2+1 has no real zero, but it has the complex zeroes i and i. As an element in [X], the polynomial X2+1 can not be written as a product of simpler polynomials. However, in [X], it has the factor decomposition

X2+1=(Xi)(X+i).

Let K be a field,MDLD/field let K[X] be the polynomial ringMDLD/polynomial ring (1) over K and aK. Then the evaluation mapping

K[X]K,PP(a),

is K-linear.MDLD/linear Moreover, we have

(PQ)(a)=P(a)Q(a),

see Exercise 19.8 .


LemmaLemma 19.8 change

Let K be a fieldMDLD/field and let K[X] be the polynomial ringMDLD/polynomial ring over K. Let PK[X] be a polynomial and aK. Then a is a zeroMDLD/zero (polynomial)

of P if and only if P is a multiple of the linear polynomial Xa.

Proof  

If P is a multiple of Xa, then we can write

P=(Xa)Q

with another polynomial Q. Inserting a yields

P(a)=(aa)Q(a)=0.

In general, there exists, due to Theorem 19.4 , a representation

P=(Xa)Q+R,

where either R=0 or the degree of R is 0, so in both cases R is a constant. Inserting a yields

P(a)=R.

So if P(a)=0 holds, then the remainder must be R=0, and this means P=(Xa)Q.



CorollaryCorollary 19.9 change

Let K be a fieldMDLD/field and let K[X] be the polynomial ringMDLD/polynomial ring over K. Let PK[X] be a polynomial (0) of degreeMDLD/degree (polynomial)

d. Then P has at most d zeroes.

Proof  

We prove the statement by induction over d. For d=0,1 the statement holds. So suppose that d2 and that the statement is already proven for smaller degrees. Let a be a zero of P (if P does not have a zero at all, we are done anyway). Hence, P=Q(Xa) by Lemma 19.8 and the degree of Q is d1, so we can apply to Q the induction hypothesis. The polynomial Q has at most d1 zeroes. For bK we have P(b)=Q(b)(ba). This can be zero, due to Lemma 3.5   (5), only if one factor is 0, so the zeroes of P are a or a zero of Q. Hence, there are at most d zeroes of P.



The Fundamental theorem of algebra

The following Fundamental theorem of algebra holds, which we state without a proof.



The Fundamental theorem of algebra implies that every polynomial P[X] different from 0 has a factorization into linear factors, that is,

P=c(Xz1)(Xz2)(Xzn),

where, up to the ordering, the complex numbers c,z1,,zn are uniquely determined (and repetitions may happen).



Rational functionen

The polynomial ring K[X] is a commutative ring,MDLD/commutative ring but not a field.MDLD/field However, we can construct a field which contains the polynomial ring with the help of the so-called formal-rational functions, in a similar way as we can construct the rational numbers from the integers . For this, we define

K(X):={PQP,QK[X],Q0},

where we identify, like in , two fractions PQ and PQ, whenever

PQ=PQ

holds. In this way, the field of rational functions (over K) arises.

A fraction P/Q of polynomials may be considered as a function which is defined outside the zeroes of the denominator. The example shows the graph of the rationale function 1/X.

The formal expression P/Q can be considered as a function in the following way.


Let K be a field.MDLD/field For polynomialsMDLD/polynomials (1K) P,QK[X], Q0, the functionMDLD/function

DK,zP(z)Q(z),

where D is the complementMDLD/complement of the zeroesMDLD/zeroes

of Q, is called a rational function.

Next to the polynomial functions, the simplest functions are the rational functions.



Footnotes
  1. Here, like for the addition of polynomials of different degrees, the coefficients for r>n or kr>m are 0.


<< | Linear algebra (Osnabrück 2024-2025)/Part I | >>
PDF-version of this lecture
Exercise sheet for this lecture (PDF)