Fluid Mechanics for MAP/Dimensional Analysis
>back to Chapters of Fluid Mechanics for MAP
>back to Chapters of Microfluid Mechanics
Motivation
[edit  edit source]Consider the steady flow around a submerged sphere. Say we are interested in the drag force on the sphere.
Let's say 10Bold text measurement points are enough for one curve, which
shows the effect of one parameter while keeping the others constant.
In order to monitor the effect of all variables, separate
measurements are needed. When each measurement takes 1/2 hr, all test series
need 2.5 years.
By using dimensional analysis, we can reduce to an equivalent form:
Both sides are dimensionless. Function is different than but it
contains all necessary information.
Full scale models might be impossible or prohibitively expensive. There might be numerous number of parameters to be tested.
Under which conditions these tests are realistic? Are the both flows dynamically similar?
“Dimensional analysis is a method which reduces number and complexity of experimental variables which affect a given physical phenomenon, using a sort of compacting technique.” (White 1979)
Dimensional analysis (DA) helps us to formulate dimensionless forms of governing equations and simplify them by the determination insignificant terms:
This is the nondimensional form of Euler equation.
Benefits of dimensional analysis (DA)
[edit  edit source]One obvious goal of our efforts should be to obtain the most information from the fewest experiments. Dimensional analysis (DA) is an important tool that often helps us to achieve this goal.
The benefits of this dimensionless representation are:
 We do not have to vary each variable: It is enough that we vary only Re and measure CD. As a result, we have enormous time and money saving.
 Dimensional analysis (DA) provides “scaling laws” which can convert data from a cheap small model to provide information about an expensive large prototype.
 DA helps our thinking and planning of an experiment or a theory.
 It suggests dimensionless ways of writing equations.
 One can find variables which can be discarded.
As a result, we can avoid to waste money and time while we use experimental and computational resources.
Derivation of dimensionless numbers
[edit  edit source]Buckingham Π theorem provides a method for computing sets of dimensionless numbers from the given variables, even if the form of the equation is still unknown.
Consider the steady flow around a sphere, which shows no separation. We will find out the dimensionless numbers governing this flow:
Step 1: List all the parameters involved. Let be the number of parameters.
Step 2: Select a set of primary dimensions, e.g. (mass, length, time, temperature, elec. charge or (Force, length, ...).
Step 3: List the dimensions of all parameters.
Let be the number of primary dimensions.
Step 4: Select number of parameters, including all the primary dimensions.
No two parameters should have the same net dimension differing by only a single exponent:
for example do not include both and .
Step 5: Set up dimensional equations combining the parameters
selected in Step 4 with each of the other parameters in turn to form dimensionless groups.
dimensionless groups will result. The dimensional equations are:
solving above equations delivers . Hence
The functional relationship should be determined experimentally and/or numerically.
Application examples of nondimensional numbers
[edit  edit source]Flow around a cylinder and a sphere
[edit  edit source]In a very large Re range the wake is unsteady, quasi timeperiodic.
Important dimensionless numbers are:
where is the kinematik viscosity.
where f is the dominant frequency of the wake structures.
where A is the projected area to the flow.
is also important for flow around a cylinder.
Losses in pipe flows
[edit  edit source]
The pressure drop along the pipe can be written as:

Lift and drag forces on airfoils
[edit  edit source]
Nondimensionalization of Governing Equations
[edit  edit source]An isothermal and newtonian fluid flow is governed by the following equations
Conservation of Mass (continuity equation):
Conservation of Momentum
One can normalize each variable with a characteristic parameter, which has the same dimension
Inserting these into the continuity equation
Dividing by
where St: Strouhal Number
Similarly, we can apply this technique to make the momentum equation nondimensional:
Dividing by
Eu: Euler Number
Re: Reynolds Number
Fr: Froude Number
The resulting dimensionless conservation of mass and of momentum equations are:
These equation indicates that solution of similar problems for two problems,
say A and B, can only be same when the dimensionless numbers are equal:
Furthermore, we should warrant the similarity of the boundary conditions and this requires
geometric similarity.
Selection of characteristic variables and Simplifications to governing equations
[edit  edit source]Consider the momentum transport equation:
For very low St, i.e. when tc < Uc/Lc, in other words when local acceleration much smaller than spatial acceleration, the flow can be accepted to be steady. Thus the first term at LHS can be neglected, i.e. the momentum equation reads
When we select:
In one phase flows, this kind of selection of the characteristic pressure is common. Thus, one can see that the pressure gradient can not be neglected.
For flows in which cavitation occurs, one can use the vapor pressure of the fluid in the characteristic pressure term:
The Froude number is important when gravity starts to play an important role, i.e. when buoyancy effects occurs due to density differences and, especially for multiphase flows. For example, we deal with a twophase flow, for which two fluids can be accepted to be immiscible, like water and air in the spill way of a dam. In order to introduce the effect of density into the Fr number, the characteristic gravity in the Fr number can be selected to be:
Thus, when the density difference becomes negligible, Fr becomes very large and the momentum equation reduces to:
The Froude number can be important also for one phase flows with large density gradients. In order to introduce this effect, the characteristic gravity in the Fr number can be written by using the density gradient:
This form of the Fr number can be used in the field of convective heat transfer at which the characteristic velocities are very low such that buoyancy dominates the flow motion. In the mixing of fluids having different densities, this form can also be one of the important nondimensional numbers.
Another simplification can be made: when the Re number of the flow is very high, the viscous stresses can be eliminated in regions where the velocity gradients are low. For example, for the cruising aircrafts the Re number is in the order of millions. Therefore, it is common approach, to use the inviscid form of Navier Stokes equations for flow simulations around cruising aircrafts, except in the vicinity of the aircraft body. For such a flow, we can neglect the gravitational effects, since Fr becomes very large. Moreover, Eu can be accepted to be 1 as shown before. Thus, the governing momentum equation reduces to the nondimensional form of Euler equations:
Similarity considerations
[edit  edit source]Once the variables are selected and the dimensional analysis is performed, the experimenter seeks to achieve similarity between the model tested and the prototype to be designed.
Flow conditions for a model test are completely similar if all relevant dimensionless parameters have the same corresponding values for the model and the prototype (White):
But this is easier said than done.
Instead of complete similarity, the engineering literature speaks of particular types of similarity:
 Geometric similarity
 Kinematic similarity
 Dynamic similarity
 Thermal similarity
Geometric similarity
[edit  edit source]A model and a prototype are geometrically similar if and only if all body dimensions in all three coordinates have the same linearscale ratio.
All angles are preserved in geometric similarity. All flow directions are preserved. The orientations of model and prototype with respect to the surroundings must be identical.
Kinematic similarity
[edit  edit source]The motions of two systems are kinematically similar if homologous particles lie at homologous points at homologous times.
In other words, kinematic similarity requires that the model and prototype have dependent lengthscale and timescale ratios. This requires, for example, similarity in Re or Mach number. The result is that the velocityscale ratio will be the same for both:
One exception, in which the length and the timescales becomes independent is the frictionless lowspeed flow, without any freesurface.
and
For a frictionless twophase flow, the Froude numbers should be same, thus
From:
and,
we obtain:
and,
Dynamic similarity
[edit  edit source]Dynamic similarity exists when the model and the prototype have the same length scale ratio, timescale ratio, and forcescale (or massscale) ratio.
Mathematically, Newton’s law for any fluid particle requires that the sum of the pressure force, gravity force, and friction force equal the acceleration term, or inertia force:
The dynamicsimilarity ensure that each of these forces will be in the same ratio and have equivalent directions between model and prototype.
Again geometric similarity is a first requirement. Then dynamic similarity exists, simultaneous with kinematic similarity, if the model and prototype force and pressure coefficients are identical. This is ensured if:
 For compressible flow, the model and prototype Reynolds number and Mach number and specificheat ratio are correspondingly equal.
 For incompressible flow
 With no free surface: model and prototype Reynolds numbers are equal.
 With a free surface: model and prototype Reynolds number, Froude number, and (if necessary) Weber number and cavitation number are correspondingly equal.
Incomplete similarity
[edit  edit source]
Not always, it is easy to obtain complete dynamic similarity.
Consider the drag force on the surface of the ship shown. To have complete dynamic similarity between test model and prototype:
For a 100 times downscaled test model, the Fr number similarity requires:
Thus, the Re number similarity can only be obtained at the same time
Only liquid which has less kinematic viscosity than water is mercury, and even with that fluid Re similarity can not be established. Since Froude number becomes more important than Re, in the experiments scaling is done using only Fr number.
An example study: Inhaler development
[edit  edit source]
Flow Visualization in Inhalers: Inhaler in the Water Tunnel
[edit  edit source]
The flow in the Handihaler is unsteady. Thus, visualization is preferred in order to understand the flow character within the inhaler. The upscaled models in water are used to slow down the speed of the flow so that we can record streaklines with a highspeed camera.
Flow in the Handihaler® and Respimat®
[edit  edit source]After preliminary visualization experiments, scenarios were planned. The flow region was divided into subregions. Dye injection holes were built in these subregions. Around 100 visualizations were made for original and modified geometries of Handihaler and Respimat.
The mechanism of particle discharge from the capsule is discovered.
With the help of the prototypes we could easily study the effect of different flow and geometrical parameters on the unsteady flow within the Handihaler
The visualization is used to validate numerical simulations.
Experiments versus simulations
[edit  edit source]Complete design of inhalers can be made by the utilization of nondimensional numbers^{[1]}.
Conclusions
[edit  edit source] Dimensional analysis and similitude are two important tools in experimental research.
 While analyzing a phenomenon one can use the dimensionless numbers to judge the importance of the governing effects.
 Similarity considerations should be carefully performed to obtain useful results, especially when similarity is not complete.
Reference
[edit  edit source] ↑ Int J Pharm. 2011 Sep 15;416(1):2534. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.05.045. Epub 2011 Jun 28. A method for the aerodynamic design of dry powder inhalers. Ertunç O, Köksoy C, Wachtel H, Delgado A.