Jump to content

Continuum mechanics/Tensor-vector identities

From Wikiversity

Tensor-vector identity - 1

[edit | edit source]
[(๐ฏโˆ™๐š)(๐‘บโˆ™๐›)]โ‹…๐ง=๐šโ‹…[{๐ฏโŠ—(๐‘บTโˆ™๐ง)}โ‹…๐›].

Proof:

Using the identity ๐šโ‹…(๐‘จTโ‹…๐›)=๐›โ‹…(๐‘จโ‹…๐š) we have

๐งโ‹…[(๐ฏโˆ™๐š)(๐‘บโˆ™๐›)]=๐›โ‹…[(๐ฏโ‹…๐š)(๐‘บTโ‹…๐ง)].

Also, using the definition (๐ฎโŠ—๐ฏ)โ‹…๐š=(๐šโ‹…๐ฏ)๐ฎ we have

(๐ฏโ‹…๐š)(๐‘บTโ‹…๐ง)=[(๐‘บTโ‹…๐ง)โŠ—๐ฏ]โ‹…๐š.

Therefore,

๐งโ‹…[(๐ฏโˆ™๐š)(๐‘บโˆ™๐›)]=๐›โ‹…[{(๐‘บTโ‹…๐ง)โŠ—๐ฏ}โ‹…๐š].

Using the identity ๐šโ‹…(๐‘จTโ‹…๐›)=๐›โ‹…(๐‘จโ‹…๐š) we have

๐›โ‹…[{(๐‘บTโ‹…๐ง)โŠ—๐ฏ}โ‹…๐š]=๐šโ‹…[{(๐‘บTโ‹…๐ง)โŠ—๐ฏ}Tโ‹…๐›].

Finally, using the relation (๐ฎโŠ—๐ฏ)T=๐ฏโŠ—๐ฎ, we get

๐šโ‹…[{(๐‘บTโ‹…๐ง)โŠ—๐ฏ}Tโ‹…๐›]=๐šโ‹…[{๐ฏโŠ—(๐‘บTโ‹…๐ง)}โ‹…๐›].

Hence,

[(๐ฏโˆ™๐š)(๐‘บโˆ™๐›)]โ‹…๐ง=๐šโ‹…[{๐ฏโŠ—(๐‘บTโˆ™๐ง)}โ‹…๐›]โ—ป

Tensor-vector identity 2

[edit | edit source]

Let ๐ฏ be a vector field and let ๐‘บ be a second-order tensor field. Let ๐š and ๐› be two arbitrary vectors. Show that

๐œตโˆ™[(๐ฏโ‹…๐š)(๐‘บโ‹…๐›)]=๐šโ‹…[{๐œต๐ฏโ‹…๐‘บ+๐ฏโŠ—(๐œตโˆ™๐‘บT)}โ‹…๐›].

Proof:

Using the identity ๐œตโˆ™(ฯ†๐ฎ)=๐ฎโ‹…๐œตฯ†+ฯ†๐œตโˆ™๐ฎ we have

๐œตโˆ™[(๐ฏโ‹…๐š)(๐‘บโ‹…๐›)]=(๐‘บโ‹…๐›)โ‹…๐œต(๐ฏโ‹…๐š)+(๐ฏโ‹…๐š)๐œตโˆ™(๐‘บโ‹…๐›).

From the identity ๐œต(๐ฎโ‹…๐ฏ)=๐œต๐ฎTโ‹…๐œต๐ฏ+๐œต๐ฏTโ‹…๐ฎ, we have ๐œต(๐ฏโ‹…๐š)=๐œต๐ฏTโ‹…๐š+๐œต๐šTโ‹…๐ฏ.

Since ๐š is constant, ๐œต๐š=0, and we have

(๐‘บโ‹…๐›)โ‹…๐œต(๐ฏโ‹…๐š)=(๐‘บโ‹…๐›)โ‹…(๐œต๐ฏTโ‹…๐š).

From the relation ๐šโ‹…(๐‘จTโ‹…๐›)=๐›โ‹…(๐‘จโ‹…๐š) we have

(๐‘บโ‹…๐›)โ‹…(๐œต๐ฏTโ‹…๐š)=๐šโ‹…[๐œต๐ฏโ‹…(๐‘บโ‹…๐›)].

Using the relation ๐‘จโ‹…(๐‘ฉโ‹…๐›)=(๐‘จโ‹…๐‘ฉ)โ‹…๐›, we get

๐œต๐ฏโ‹…(๐‘บโ‹…๐›)=(๐œต๐ฏโ‹…๐‘บ)โ‹…๐›.

Therefore, the final form of the first term is

(๐‘บโ‹…๐›)โ‹…๐œต(๐ฏโ‹…๐š)=๐šโ‹…[(๐œต๐ฏโ‹…๐‘บ)โ‹…๐›].

For the second term, from the identity ๐œตโˆ™(๐‘บTโ‹…๐ฏ)=๐‘บ:๐œต๐ฏ+๐ฏโ‹…(๐œตโˆ™๐‘บ) we get, ๐œตโˆ™(๐‘บโ‹…๐›)=๐‘บT:๐œต๐›+๐›โ‹…(๐œตโˆ™๐‘บT).

Since ๐› is constant, ๐œต๐›=0, and we have

(๐ฏโ‹…๐š)๐œตโˆ™(๐‘บโ‹…๐›)=(๐ฏโ‹…๐š)[๐›โ‹…(๐œตโˆ™๐‘บT)]=๐šโ‹…[{๐›โ‹…(๐œตโˆ™๐‘บT)}๐ฏ].

From the definition (๐ฎโŠ—๐ฏ)โ‹…๐š=(๐šโ‹…๐ฏ)๐ฎ, we get

[๐›โ‹…(๐œตโˆ™๐‘บT)]๐ฏ=[๐ฏโŠ—(๐œตโˆ™๐‘บT)]โ‹…๐›.

Therefore, the final form of the second term is

(๐ฏโ‹…๐š)๐œตโˆ™(๐‘บโ‹…๐›)=๐šโ‹…[๐ฏโŠ—(๐œตโˆ™๐‘บT)]โ‹…๐›.

Adding the two terms, we get

๐œตโˆ™[(๐ฏโ‹…๐š)(๐‘บโ‹…๐›)]=๐šโ‹…[(๐œต๐ฏโ‹…๐‘บ)โ‹…๐›]+๐šโ‹…[๐ฏโŠ—(๐œตโˆ™๐‘บT)]โ‹…๐›.

Therefore,

๐œตโˆ™[(๐ฏโ‹…๐š)(๐‘บโ‹…๐›)]=๐šโ‹…[{๐œต๐ฏโ‹…๐‘บ+๐ฏโŠ—(๐œตโˆ™๐‘บT)}โ‹…๐›]โ—ป