# Complex Numbers

An extension of Imaginary Numbers, complex numbers allow us to combine real numbers with imaginary numbers to produce meaningful results from manipulating and changing things around. This page covers very basic imaginary number ideas.

## Prerequisites[edit | edit source]

Before starting this, there are some prior knowledge that this page calls upon. Below is a list of the most notable prerequisites that you will need to understand what is going on.

## The Basics - Complex Number[edit | edit source]

A complex number is part of the set of complex numbers which we represent as the symbol, . Thus any complex number is part of this set . Suppose we have complex number, . Now since its a complex number we can say that, is part of the set of complex numbers, , which we write as

Now the general formula for our complex number, or any complex number, can be written as:

where

and are real numbers i.e. and in the set of real numbers, , which we can again write as .

The complex number is made up of two parts. They are:

- The real part, which is (We can show this as )
- The imaginary part, the number in front of the , which is (We can show this as )

This is how we connect the real part with the imaginary part. There are different forms of expressing a complex number, but this form is called the Cartesian Form (because its like how we show real numbers on the Cartesian plane ())

### Conjugate[edit | edit source]

An important idea in complex numbers is the conjugate of a complex number. This is simply the opposite of a complex number and is rather easy to figure out. Lets take our previous complex number, . We already know what this is (), so the conjugate of it would be:

We simply change the sign in front of the imaginary part to get our conjugate for . Pretty simple. We the conjugate of , is shown with a special symbol, . Its the variable for our complex number with a bar over it. This is the conjugate.

### Operations with 2 complex numbers[edit | edit source]

There are various operations that one can do with complex numbers. Here we demonstrate the 4 basic operations fundamental to the area. Here we suppose that:

#### Addition[edit | edit source]

Adding complex numbers is just like adding two different expressions in algebra. No tricks here.

Note: We put the real parts in one bracket and the imaginary parts in another. This is just done to make it simpler to understand. In a real question, add them together

e.g.

and

#### Subtraction[edit | edit source]

Subtracting is the opposite process. Be wary of the negative sign however.

e.g.

and

#### Multiplication[edit | edit source]

Unlike, addition or subtraction, multiplying imaginary numbers isn't as straightforward although we still use the same idea of FOIL to multiply the two numbers (treat them like expressions). What usually happens is that we times an imaginary part by another imaginary part which results in a negative. Remember:

We can show the multiplication of as

Remember to be careful when squaring .

#### Division[edit | edit source]

Division is not like any of the previous operations in that it requires knowledge of the conjugate of a complex numbers. We can express the division of two complex numbers as:

Using this we must make the denominator (the number at the bottom) a real number. That is we need to times the fraction by the conjugate of . Here is a step by step process:

- Find the conjugate of the denominator: In our case, the denominator is , which is . is . That is our conjugate
- Times the top and bottom by the conjugate:
- Multiply like normal:
- Answer:

Note the denominator in our answer. It has some significance later.

#### Powers[edit | edit source]

Raising a complex number to a power is done in the same way that we raise a power of an expression in normal algebra, but in keep in mind to be wary of the powers of .

### Revision Questions[edit | edit source]

Here a few questions to help you remember. Practice makes perfect.

Let:

## Solving polynomials of [edit | edit source]

Solving polynomials in the real plane is rather simple and is something covered in Algebra. For example, we can easily solve , which is . However, sometimes we encounter polynomials where there seems to be no real solutions. For example take the quadraticː

Now if we were to use the quadratic formula, a curious error occurs in the discriminant part. Remember the discriminant of an equation is given byː

Now if you recall, if , there were no **real** solutions (The emphasis on 'real' since in the complex plane, there exist solutions). Subbing in our coefficients, we getː

Nothing strange here apart from the equation seemingly having no **real** solutions. When using the quadratic equation we getː

Wait what? has no real solutions since you cannot square root a negative. Right? Well in the complex plane you can, since the idea of is built upon the idea that . We can express as which is . Now we have solutions for this equationː

And those our answers. Using the complex plane, we can solve polynomials that have no real solutions. There are a few techniques we can employ to solve polynomials in the complex plane.

### Sum of perfect squares[edit | edit source]

In the real plane, you cannot really factorizeː

But in the complex plane we can assume that can be written as , which when expanded gives usː . So we can show the sum of two squares asː

Which is the difference of two squares soː

e.g.

Solve = 0

Now we can arrange the equation asː

And then square root it to get our answerː

But we can use the sum of perfect squares to also do this

And soː

### Quadratic substitution[edit | edit source]

We can apply this technique of quadratic substitution to simplify polynomials where only even coefficients exist, such as . Lets use an example to understand how we do thisː

We can express these coefficients as powers of 2 (hence the quadratic substitution idea). Lets take a variable, say , and say that

Now we can solve this like any normal quadraticː

soː

But remember that , so we have one more step to doː

And now we square root, remembering to express any negative square root as a positive square root with ()

### Factorising by Grouping[edit | edit source]

Generally used for polynomials with an even number of terms, we can group like terms together (similar to what we do when factoring non-monic trinomials in quadratics). Take the equationː

We can group like terms together based on coefficients. Through careful rearranging and finding the HCF we can find thatː

Now we can simply solve using the Null Factor Lawː

And that's the solutions. Just to make sure you've found all the solutions, take into account what type of polynomial it is (cubic, quadratic, quartic, etc.). Here a cubic will have 3 solutions which we have found.

### Factor Theorem[edit | edit source]

Just like the methods we use when solving polynomials, we can apply the factor theorem to solving polynomials over . Remember the factor theoremː

If is a factor of the polynomial, , then .

In complex numbers, we can use this idea to not only prove that something is a factor, but then using division to find a quadratic factor of a polynomial. For example takeː

and is a factor. First we sub in for .

So we know definitely is a factor. Now all we do is divide by this factor (it may be a bit tricky doing this with complex numbers but remember to apply the same rules and watch out for )

Now we simply solve the quadratic. Using Complete The Square (same process as with real numbers, but be careful of that and also remember that )

We end up withː

And now we have solved our equation.

### Conjugate Root Theorem[edit | edit source]

A really major part of solving polynomials over is the conjugate root theorem. This idea is unique to complex numbers, thanks to the special properties of . It is important to note that this idea only applies to polynomials which have **REAL** coefficients, so can't really have conjugate complex pairs. The theorem statesː

If is a root of polynomial, , then so is the conjugate, If is a factor of polynomial of, , then so is the conjugate factor,

This has major implications in the way we solve polynomials, causing us to see that every polynomial can be viewed as the product of some factors and the conjugate pairs of two or more conjugate numbers. It also allows us to deduce quickly the other roots of a polynomial without a lengthy process.

## Polar form[edit | edit source]

### The Argand Diagram[edit | edit source]

In complex numbers, we have to find a way to represent these geometrically in order to do various manipulations. The solution to this problem is through Argand diagrams. In general, Argand diagrams can be described as Cartesian planes which have been repurposed to fit the idea of complex numbers. Here, the -axis becomes the 'real axis' and the -axis becomes the 'imaginary axis'.

Using the Cartesian form, we can plot the locations of our complex numbers on the plane. Suppose we have the complex number,, be . We would plot it as in the image shown. Notice how the value for and the value for are plotted. They correspond to a value on their respective axis, being plotted at the same value as the real part and plotted as the same value as the imaginary part.

The Argand Diagram shares many similarities with the way the Cartesian plane works, in the way that the complex numbers are plotted. In fact, the form of a complex number, , is called **Cartesian** or **Rectangular** **form**, because of this. There are other forms of complex number representations, one of which is polar form.

### Polar Form[edit | edit source]

Polar form is a new way at looking how we describe the location of a point on any plane, not just the Argand Diagram. In Cartesian, we usually describe the location of a point based on two values which when drawn perpendicular from their respective axis, intersect at that point. In polar form however, we describe a point based on its distance from the origin and the angle it has from the positive x-direction. We can apply polar form to many coordinate systems but for now, let's stick to complex numbers. We usually right the coordinates of a complex number in Cartesian form as:

In polar form however, we describe the location of a complex number as the distance from origin and angle (called an argument) from the positive x axis:

or

Now what do all these numbers mean?

If you covered unit circles, its evident that can be a representation of the -coordinate (which in this case is the real number) and can be a representation of the -coordinate, (which in this case is the imaginary part. Thus that's our first part solved. With , that's the modulus function, which gives us the distance from origin. We can solve what is and what is using the equation:

Now, the equation for looks familiar. Its actually Pythagoras' Theorem, which we are using to determine the length of point from the origin, by taking our side lengths as and . We actually did this before and was the multiplication of a complex number and its conjugate:

However, this is taken further and square rooted. We call this the **modulus** of a function, i.e. the distance it has from the origin. We write this as:

Notice how the modulus of a number uses the symbol, . This is called the absolute value or modulus function, and its definition is consistent with what we did here. Now, the , is what we call the **argument of** and we right this using radians, rather than degrees. To figure out the argument of say, complex number (), we do the following:

- Figure out in what quadrant the complex number lies in: We can figure this out by simply looking at the signs of the real and imaginary part of the complex number and relating it to the way that we figure out if an coordinate is in what quadrant.
- Assignment: In our complex number, , we can relate the trig identities of and to their appropriate parts (real, imaginary). This is where the knowledge of the unit circle comes in handy, since we can imagine that and as and , and in a unit circle, and . Through this we can equate to find the argument.
- Use CAST: Now using CAST we can perform the necessary calculations to find the appropriate angle for our argument. Remember step 1, Figure out what quadrant the complex number lies in? This is where we use it. We can use but rather we can figure out by using and . To figure out by doing this we simply do:
- Compare and deduce: Now that we have 3 theta values, we can work out the argument of the complex number is. A positive value means the angle will be in an anti-clockwise direction from 0 whereas a negative angle value is from 0 degrees in a clockwise direction (Remember CAST)
- Answer: Give the answer in radians. To convert from degrees to radians use the formula:

Argument of , has now been found. We can now write our complex number, as:

### Converting from cartesian to polar[edit | edit source]

Converting from cartesian to polar is rather complicated but through these steps you can do so. Take the complex number:

###### Figure out modulus:[edit | edit source]

Remember that . Subbing the real, , and the imaginary, , values for and . So the modulus of is

So is .

###### Figure out argument:[edit | edit source]

Now that we have the modulus, all we need now is the argument, the . First figure out which quadrant it we can find the complex number in. and are both positive values so our complex number lies in Quadrant 1.

Now we use CAST. Since is in Quadrant one, the and values will be positive.

So our argument is . However, when dealing with polar form, we want to express this as radians. So we can use our formula, .

So that's our argument, , in radians. So now we can write out our complex number in polar formː

### Converting from Polar to Cartesian[edit | edit source]

Conversion from polar to cartesian is that we apply somewhat the opposite process to our polar form. Suppose we have the complex number in polar formː

Now if we use our intuition and some knowledge of the unit circle (its heavily recommended to know about the unit circle before reading this), we find that is in fact in the 4th quadrant. So in our cartesian form, will be negative and will be positive. Now we could just go straight ahead and work out the and values for it, but if we use our knowledge of reference angles, we can find that the reference angle for this is . Now we can go ahead and work out the two parts of .

Remember CAST. This is why the was negative when working out . So now our complex number in cartesian form isː

### Operations in polar form[edit | edit source]

In polar form, we are only limited to multiplying and dividing polar forms of complex numbers. Addition or subtraction requires us to convert to cartesian form.

For our examples we will be usingː

#### Multiplication[edit | edit source]

When multiplying, simply multiply the modulus and add the angles

#### Division[edit | edit source]

When dividing we use the same idea, dividing the modulus and subtracting the angles

### Powers - De Moivre's Formula[edit | edit source]

When discussing powers in polar form, we can use De Moivre's Formula (named after French Mathematician Abraham de Moivre) . When raising the complex number, , to a power in polar form we simply doː

Its a simplification of multiplying the complex number multiple times (which was what powers are essentially).

### Finding roots of a polynomial in [edit | edit source]

Using De Moivre's formula, we can find the roots of a polynomial. Now there are two ways to find roots of a polynomial, either through the **rectangular method** or the **polar form method**.

#### Rectangular Method[edit | edit source]

Rectangular method uses the idea of squaring a complex number . Lets take an exampleː

**Solve**

Now, , however must've been derived from . So lets see what looks like if

Now we end up with this expanded form. Notice that we can also call this a complex number since there are 2 parts, a real part and an imaginary part. So what we can do, is equate the real and imaginary parts and solve like a normal equation for and .

We can remove the since its unnecessary. Now we solve like a simultaneous equation. Start with and sub it into

- (divide by 2)
- (rearranging it to make y the subject)
- (subbing in our known y value)
- (rationalising everything)
- (we've reached a quartic. We can use quadratic substitution). Let
- (remember that )
- (remember, , is our real part of the complex number so we don't include which would yield, )
- (using the values of positive and negative , we find the values of )

So now we've found the answer (after a very long process) that the roots of , areː

Which we can express asː

#### Polar form[edit | edit source]

Although cartesian form yields a very comfortable looking answer, it takes a long and tedious process to do so. However, using polar form, we can find the roots rather easily using De Moivre's Formula. Lets explain using an exampleː

**Solve**

Now De Moivre's theorem states that when raising a number by a powerː

If we can use this idea and apply it to our equation

## Complex Number[edit | edit source]

The set of complex numbers is denoted . A complex number can be written in Cartesian coordinates as

where . is called the 'real part' of and is called the 'imaginary part' of . These can also be written in a trigonometric polar form, as

where is the 'magnitude' of and is called the 'argument' of . These two forms are related by the equations

The trigonometric polar form can also be written as

by using Euler's Identity

Coordination

in Cartesian form, in trigonometric polar form, in polar exponential form.

## Complex conjugate Number[edit | edit source]

A complex number is a complex conjugate of a number if and only if

If a complex number is written as , then the conjugate is

Equivalently in polar form if then

## Mathematical Operations[edit | edit source]

### Operation on 2 different complex numbers[edit | edit source]

Addition Subtraction Multiplication Division

### Operation on complex numbers and its conjugate[edit | edit source]

Addition Subtraction Multiplication Division

### In Polar form[edit | edit source]

Operation on complex number and its conjugate

Operation on 2 different complex numbers

### Complex power[edit | edit source]

A careful analysis of the power series for the exponential, sine, and cosine functions reveals the marvelous

*Euler formula*[edit | edit source]

```
```

of which there is the famous case (for θ = π):

More generally,

```
```

*de Moivre's formula*[edit | edit source]

```
```

for any real and integer . This result is known as .

### Transcendental functions[edit | edit source]

The higher mathematical functions (often called "transcendental functions"), like exponential, log, sine, cosine, etc., can be defined in terms of power series (Taylor series). They can be extended to handle complex arguments in a completely natural way, so these functions are defined over the complex plane. They are in fact "complex analytic functions". Many standard functions can be extended to the complex numbers, and may well be analytic (the most notable exception is the logarithm). Since the power series coefficients of the common functions are real, they work naturally with conjugates. For example:

## Summary[edit | edit source]

Complex number

. In Rectangular plane . In Polar plane . In trigonometry . In Complex plane

Complex conjugate number

. In Rectangular plane . In Polar plane . In trigonometry angle . In Complex plane

## External Links[edit | edit source]

Videos

- Imaginary Numbers are Real [Part 1ː Introduction] by Welch Labs
- Complex Roots of Polynomials by MathsStatUNSW