Let's consider the following expression:
As n gets larger and larger, the fraction gets closer and closer to 1.
As n approaches infinity, the expression will evaluate to fractions where the difference between them and 1 becomes negligible. The expression itself approaches 1. As mathematicians would say, the limit of the expression as goes to infinity is 1, or in symbols: .
An interesting sequence is
As gets bigger (in symbols , we have smaller values of , for
and so on. Clearly, can't be smaller than zero (for if we have that is less than zero).
Then we may say that .
Continuing with this sequence, we might want to study what happens when gets near to zero, and later what happens with negative values of going near to zero. Usually, the letter is reserved for integer values, so we are going to redefine our sequence as . If we take a sequence of values of , say
We see that the respective values of grows indefinitely, for
In this case, we might say that the limit of , in words, the limit of as goes to zero from right (as the sequence of values of goes to zero from the left in a graphic) diverge (or tends to infinity, or is unbounded, but we never say that it is infinity or equals infinity).
Other case happens if we study sequences of values of such that every element of the sequence is lower than zero, the sequence is increasing but never exceeding zero. One example of such sequence is:
- , with
- , with
- , with
- , with
- , with
The values of decrease without bounds. The we say that , or that tends to minus infinity when goes to zero from left.
For some limits (if the function is continuous at and near the limit), the variable can be replaced with its value directly:
(with not equal to 0)
Others are somewhat more complicated:
Note that in this limit, one may not immediately set equal to because this would result in the expression evaluating to
which is an undefined expression. However, one may reduce the expression by separating the terms into separate fractions (in this case, and ), which can be evaluated directly.
Right and Left Hand Limits
Sometimes, we want to calculate the limit of a function as a variable approaches a certain value from only one side; that is, from the left or right side. This is denoted, respectively, by or .
If the left-hand and right-hand limits do not both exist, or are not equal to each other, then the limit does not exist.
The following limit does not exist:
It doesn't because the left and right handed limits are unequal.
Note that if the function is undefined at the point where we are trying to find the limit, it doesn't mean that the limit of the function at that point does not exist; for an example, let's evaluate at .
Some Formal Definitions and Properties
Until now, limits have been discussed informally but it shouldn't be all intuition, for we need to be sure of certain assertions. For an example, the limit
We have seen that the function decreases as increases, but how do we guarantee that there isn't a value , say
such that is never smaller than ? If there is such , we might want to say that the limit is , not zero, and we can't test every single possible value of (for there are infinite possibilities). We must then find a mathematical way of proving that there isn't such , but for that we need to define formally what a limit is.
Right Limits, Left Limits, Limits and Continuity
Let be a real valued function. We say that
if for every there is a such that, for every between and
where is the absolute value of .
This is the formal definition of convergence from the left. It means that for each possible error bigger than zero, we are able to find a interval such that for all in that interval, the distance between the value of the function and the constant is less than the error.
TODO: Graphics illustrating this.
In an analogous fashion, we say that
if for every there is a such that, for every between and , .
And to finish the necessary definitions,
This is a assertion that must be proved. First, lets study the behavior of near zero;
where the arrow pointing right means implies. So, define the function
If , then . We have show how to find the delta in the definition of limit, showing that the limit of as x tends to zero is zero.
In fact, for any real number ,
Lets see how to construct a suitable function .
- , then
implying that makes for any .
Functions with the property that
are called continuous, and arise very naturally in the physical sciences; Beware that, against the intuition of most people, not every function is continuous.
Property of Limits
Property one: If , then
for any constant .
Proof: Construct the function for . Then
Then the limit of is , for the delta function of is
TODO: Demonstrate main properties of limit (unicity, etc)
L'Hôpital's Rule is used when a limit approaches an indeterminate form. The two main indeterminate forms are and . Other indeterminate forms can be algebrically manipulated, such as .
L'Hôpital's Rule states if a limit of approaches an intederminate form as approaches , then:
Both the numerator and the denominator approach zero as approaches zero, therefore the limit is in indeterminate form, so l'Hôpital's rule can be applied to this limit. (note: you can also use the Sandwich Theorem.)
Now the limit is in a usable form, which equals 1.
If the limit resulting from applying l'Hôpital's Rule is still one of the two mentioned indeterminates, we may apply the rule again (to the limit obtained), and again and again until a usable form is encountered.
Where does it come from
To obtain l'Hôpital's Rule for a limit of which approaches as approaches , we simply decompose both and in terms of their Taylor expansion (centered around ). The independent terms of both expansions must be (because both and approached ), so if we divide both the and by (or, equivalently, find their derivatives), our limit will stop being indeterminate.
It could be the case that the Taylor expansions of both the numerator and the denominator have a as coefficient of the term, thus yielding an indeterminate. This is the same case mentioned above where the trick was to repeat the process until a suitable limit was found.
The case of a limit which approaches can be transformed to the case above by exchanging with , which obviously approaches .