This paper deals with binomial and odd power
. It presents two ways of grouping terms so that
is always a sum of 2 coprime numbers: a first form
, and a second notable one with squares
. This latter form with
is all the more remarkable given that it is unique when
is prime . Finally with
prime, we show that
prime factors are congruent to
, whereas
congruent to
.
We have searched how a powered number could systematically be shared into a sum of 2 coprime numbers. From binomial, we have studied different ways of grouping terms together so that
. With odd
and
coprime of opposite parity, we have found out two possibilities. They involve the same
functions that we must now introduce.
Definition
Let us define
functions as

Example
Propositions

Proof
Binomial theorem gives:
Here
is odd. So (1) is simply obtained by grouping together the odd power of
and
(2) is a consequence of (1).
Indeed it gives
Thus by multiplying:
And finally
Which leads to the proposition by replacing
Examples for (2):
Examples in
:
Proposition

Proof
(1) implies (3)
(3bis) using
Let us consider a more detailed form of
:
Proposition

Proof
First,
so
of opposite parity implies
and
odd.
The rule on gcd,
, immediately implies (6) and (7).
Indeed,
.
And for
,
so
Assertion (5) needs more attention.
Let us consider
a common odd prime divisor.
The second form gives us
, thus
According to the definition of
Thus
, and the same
Every divisor of
and
divides
and
Examples: previous examples with prime factors
Proposition
Let

an odd prime and

2 positive integers such that

. Then there exists a unique pair of coprime positive integers

such that

Examples for prime and composite numbers:
The first form is always given by the square formula (2) .
The additional ones for composite numbers found with a python script
Proof
here on math.stackexchange.com. I report here the Jandri's "elementary" and brilliant one:
Let
an odd integer,
an odd prime and let
and
be two pairs of coprime integers such that
.
Combining the equalities we obtain
then
divides
.
cannot divide simultaneously
and
otherwise divides
then
or
; if
divides
then
divides
: contradiction because
and
are coprime (idem
if
divides ).
We deduce that
divides
with
.
To finish we write by multiplying the two expressions of
:
.
We deduce
then
and
.
Here
Let us rewrite propositions (6) and (7) in term of n-valuation:
Proposition

Proofs
cf previously in coprimality
Proposition
![{\displaystyle n\in \mathbb {P} ,2\mid xy,~x\wedge y=1,\quad {\begin{cases}f_{n}(x,y)=\prod p_{i}^{v_{i}}&\Rightarrow p_{i}\equiv \pm 1[2n]&(8)\\f_{n}(x^{2},y)=\prod p_{i}^{v_{i}}&\Rightarrow p_{i}\equiv \pm 1[2n]&(9)\\f_{n}(x^{2},y^{2})=\prod p_{i}^{v_{i}}&\Rightarrow p_{i}\equiv \ 1[2n]&(10)\end{cases}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/019c8ea4c56a5c7c9a9318d90427f18e8f34c295)
Proofs
here for (8) p=1[2n] .
here for (10): math.stackexchange.com .Thanks Thomas Andrews
Note
Fermat theorem gives
and
. But it also applies to all the prime factors
Let us remind the Fermat's theorem on sums of two squares:
And the Euler's theorem:
, which is here
Fermat had discovered that
and
had
prime factors (cf letters to Mersenne and Frenicle in 1640)
Let us note that these
also appear in Fermat-Wiles theorem with (3)
Examples for
Examples for
. The number of
factors is even
Examples with both squared variables: