Big bang/a The Big Bang —A Hot Issue in Science Communication
(Review Paper) Cited in Big bang/a The Big Bang —A Hot Issue in Science Communication
Astronomers support the big bang theory[edit | edit source]
The big bang theory is a comprehensive explanation of how the universe came to existence [1].
Scientists are lacking creditability[edit | edit source]
Individuals who refute the big bang theory fail to mention the scientists and their credentials that support them. Further research has shown that many of these scientists are from Creationists Research Institute. [2].
Support of Many Sciences[edit | edit source]
There are many scientific fields that support the big bang theory. Including cosmology, astronomy, quantum physics and chemistry [3].
Always Being Tested[edit | edit source]
The big bang theory is always being tested, therefore, more knowledge is gained to support the theory [4].
Public Representations[edit | edit source]
Highly influential public figures misunderstand the big bang theory and therefore misrepresent the theory to the public [5].
Methods[edit | edit source]
Results[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Griffiths, M., Oliveira, C. (2010).The Big Bang. Communicating Astronomy with the Public Journal (10) 7-11
- ↑ Griffiths, M., Oliveira, C. (2010).The Big Bang. Communicating Astronomy with the Public Journal (10) 7-11
- ↑ Griffiths, M., Oliveira, C. (2010). The Big Bang. Communicating Astronomy with the Public Journal (10) 7-11
- ↑ The Big Bang. Communicating Astronomy with the Public Journal (10) 7-11
- ↑ The Big Bang. Communicating Astronomy with the Public Journal (10) 7-11