Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/Bedtime procrastination

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Initial suggestions[edit source]

@U3227684: Thanks for tackling this topic. Some initial suggestions:

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

I wonder if a poll could work for this topic?[edit source]

Perhaps conducting a poll about people's bedtime procrastination could be interesting? ---- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:19, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Relationship between sleep and procrastination - suggestion[edit source]

Hi @U3227684,

I think if you're worried about the word count/if the sections necessary you could maybe find another wikiversity article that talks about as an internal source instead. just a suggestions :) U3224203 (discusscontribs) 08:22, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

Title[edit source]

  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted

Headings[edit source]

  1. Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic
  2. Probably overly detailed
  3. Headings 2 and 3 could be abbreviated and/or subsumed into the Overview and/or other sections. In this way the three sub-title/focus questions could serve as the primary structure for the top-level headings

Overview[edit source]

  1. Add the scenario in a feature box at the start to help catch reader interest
  2. Evocative description of the problem/topic, with mention of relevant psychological theory/research
  3. Focus questions should be more focused on the structure suggested by the sub-title

Key points[edit source]

  1. Excellent – key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations
  2. Consider using tables to summarise some information (as a way of reducing word count)
  3. For sections which include sub-sections include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
  4. Good balance of theory and research
  5. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Well developed
    2. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)

Figure[edit source]

  1. Excellent - A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited

Learning feature[edit source]

  1. One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Excellent use of example(s)/case study(ies)
  3. Promising use of quiz question(s)
  4. Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information

References[edit source]

  1. Excellent

Resources[edit source]

  1. See also
    1. Excellent
  2. External links
    1. Excellent

User page[edit source]

  1. Excellent – used effectively
  2. Excellent description about self provided
  3. Link(s) provided to professional profile(s)
  4. Are you on LinkedIn?
  5. Link provided to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Book chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits

Overview[edit source]

  1. Well developed
  2. The quality of written expression can be improved (e.g., see my copyedits)
  3. Engages reader interest by introducing a case study and/or scenario with an image in a feature box
  4. Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon
  5. Clear focus question(s)

Theory[edit source]

  1. An excellent range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained
  2. BP is perhaps overly tied to mobile phone use; it is important to also recognise that BP can occur without being associated with phone use
  3. Clarify understanding of risk versus consequence
  4. Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters)
  5. Insightful depth is provided about relevant theory(ies)
  6. Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts
  7. Key citations are well used

Research[edit source]

  1. Excellent review of relevant research
  2. Excellent critical thinking about relevant research is evident
  3. Could place more emphasis on systematic reviews and effect sizes for interventions

Integration[edit source]

  1. Excellent integration between theory and research

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. Excellent summary and conclusion
  2. Key points are well summarised
  3. Clear take-home message(s)

Style[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is very good
    2. Use active (e.g., "this chapter explored") rather than passive voice (e.g., "this chapter has explored" or "this chapter will explore") [1][2]
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections
  3. Grammar
    1. The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags)
  4. APA style
    1. Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc.
    2. Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159)
    3. Figures
      1. Figures are very well captioned
      2. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text
    4. Tables
      1. Use APA style for captions. See example
      2. Each Table is referred to at least once within the main text
    5. Citations use correct APA style
    6. References use almost correct APA style
      1. Check and correct use of capitalisation[3]

Learning features[edit source]

  1. Excellent use of learning features
  2. One use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
  3. One use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Excellent use of image(s)
  5. Very good use of table(s)
  6. Excellent use of feature box(es)
  7. Very good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
  8. Excellent use of case studies or examples
  9. Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
  10. Excellent use of external links in the "External links" section

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~18 logged, useful, minor to major social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 20:59, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a very good presentation

Overview[edit source]

  1. An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. The font size for open slide is very small.
  2. Also narrate the sub-title
  3. Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest
  4. A scenario is presented in text but not verbally described. The display time for reading the scenario is minimal.
  5. A brief verbal definition BP is provided
  6. Establish a clearer context for the presentation (e.g., by using an example or explaining why it is important), to help the viewer understand
  7. Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation.

Content[edit source]

  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  2. The presentation addresses the topic
  3. An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
  4. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory
  5. The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological research
  6. Ideally, make more explicit use of research
  7. Include citations to support claims
  8. The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies
  9. The presentation provides easy to understand information

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. A Conclusion slide is presented with a very good summary

Audio[edit source]

  1. The audio is easy to follow
  2. The presentation makes very good use of narrated audio
  3. Audio communication is reasonably well paced
  4. Consider slowing down and leaving longer pauses between sentences. This can help the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point
  5. Good intonation
  6. The narration is well practiced and/or performed
  7. Audio recording quality was excellent
  8. The narrated content is well matched to the target topic (see content)

Video[edit source]

  1. Overall, visual display quality is very good
  2. The presentation makes good use of animated slides
  3. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
  4. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams
  5. The presentation is well produced using PowToon
  6. The visual content is well matched to the target topic (see content)

Meta-data[edit source]

  1. The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. A written description of the presentation is provided
  3. Links to and from the book chapter are provided
  4. The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This creates limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info.

Licensing[edit source]

  1. Image sources and their copyright status are communicated
  2. A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:59, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply