Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Hedonic adaptation prevention model

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

How can the Hedonic Adaptation Prevention (HAP) Model be applied?[edit source]

http://sonjalyubomirsky.com/files/2012/09/Sheldon-Boehm-Lyubomirsky-2012.pdf

Hello! Thank you for engaging in a discussion on how the HAP model can be applied.

'The model specifies two moderators... continued appreciation of the original life change and continued variety in change-related experiences.'

Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2012). The Challenge of Staying Happier: Testing the Hedonic Adaptation Prevention Model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 670–680.


Topic development feedback[edit source]

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title[edit source]

  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted

User page[edit source]

  1. Excellent – used effectively
  2. Brief description about self provided – consider expanding
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Excellent – at least one contribution has been made and summarised in a numbered list with direct link(s) to evidence

Headings[edit source]

  1. Basic, 1-level heading structure – would benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure

Key points[edit source]

  1. Basic development of key points for each section, with relevant citations
  2. Overview - Consider adding:
    1. an evocative description of the problem and what will be covered
    2. expanded focus questions
    3. an image
    4. an example or case study
  3. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research
  4. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters.
  5. Consider including more examples/case studies
  6. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Hasn't been developed
    2. What might the take-home, practical messages be?
    3. In a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?

Figure[edit source]

  1. Excellent – A relevant figure is presented and it is appropriately captioned - this can also be included as a social contribution
  2. Well done on creating and uploading your own image!
  3. Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text

References[edit source]

  1. Very good
  2. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. italicisation
    2. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)

Resources[edit source]

  1. See also
    1. Excellent
  2. External links
    1. Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:05, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a reasonably good presentation

Overview[edit source]

  1. Display and narrate a slide with the same title and sub-title as the book chapter to help the viewer understand the purpose of the presentation
  2. This presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest
  3. Perhaps avoid mentioning specific authors in the initial introduction (could be off-putting when trying to engage audience)
  4. A context for the topic is established
  5. Consider using an initial example to explain the concept
  6. Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation.

Content[edit source]

  1. The presentation addresses the topic
  2. The presentation is well structured (i.e., Overview, Content, Conclusion)
  3. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory
  4. The presentation makes implied use of relevant psychological research; ideally include research more explicitly
  5. Include citations to support claims
  6. The presentation makes good use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice
  7. The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. A Conclusion is presented with excellent take-home message(s)
  2. The presentation could be strengthened by also communicating the take-home message via text

Audio[edit source]

  1. The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio
  2. Audio communication is clear and well paced
  3. Very good intonation
  4. The narration is well practiced
  5. Audio recording quality was very good

Video[edit source]

  1. Overall, visual display quality is good
  2. Use of web-cam is engagement
  3. However, inclusion of some key text and/or images would improve the quality of visual communication
  4. The presentation is well produced using simple tools

Meta-data[edit source]

  1. The (almost correct) chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. A written description of the presentation is provided
  3. A link to the book chapter is provided but the hyperlink isn't active to allow 1-click access
  4. A link from the book chapter is provided

Licensing[edit source]

  1. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 12:02, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Book chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an insufficient chapter mainly because it is incomplete
  2. Well under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand
  3. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits

Overview[edit source]

  1. Underdeveloped Overview
  2. Explain the problem or phenomenon in more detail
  3. Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest
  4. Very basic focus question(s)

Theory – Breadth[edit source]

  1. Promising, but insufficient use of relevant psychological theory about this topic
  2. Builds somewhat well on related chapters

Theory – Depth[edit source]

  1. Promising, but insufficient depth is provided about relevant theory(ies)
  2. Excellent use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts

Research – Key findings[edit source]

  1. Insufficient review of relevant research

Research – Critical thinking[edit source]

  1. Insufficient critical thinking about relevant research is evident

Integration[edit source]

  1. Insufficient integration between theory and research

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. Insufficient as a cohesive summary of the best available psychological theory and research about the topic
  2. Remind the reader about the importance of the problem or phenomenon of interest
  3. Address the focus questions
  4. Add practical, take-home message(s)

Written expression – Style[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is basic
    2. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes
  2. APA style
    1. Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression; use quotation marks only for the first occurrence of the word or phrase, not for subsequent occurrences" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159)
    2. Direct quotes need page numbers – even better, write in your own words
    3. References are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. Check and correct use of capitalisation[2]
      2. Check and correct use of italicisation
      3. Include hyperlinked dois

Written expression – Learning features[edit source]

  1. Basic use of learning features
  2. One use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
  3. One use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Good use of image(s)
  5. No use of table(s)
  6. Basic use of feature box(es)
  7. No use of quiz(zes)
  8. Very good use of case studies or examples
  9. Good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
  10. Good use of external links in the "External links" section
    1. Rename links per Tutorial 02
    2. Include sources in parentheses

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~9 logged, useful, minor/moderate/major social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:48, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply