Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Financial investing, motivation, and emotion

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Resources[edit source]

Hi, Looks like you have a great outline. Since you have referenced Loomes and Sugden (1982), I think you may also find Bell (1982) useful. Full citation below.

Bell, D. (1982). Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty. Operations Research, 30(5), 961–981. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.30.5.961

U3216256 (discusscontribs) 03:10, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback[edit source]

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title[edit source]

  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  2. The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted

User page[edit source]

  1. Excellent – used effectively
  2. Description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Excellent – at least one contribution has been made and summarised in a numbered list with direct link(s) to evidence

Headings[edit source]

  1. Effective 2-level heading structure – clear and easy to follow, logical, covers topic appropriately

Key points[edit source]

  1. Overall, well developed key points for each section, with relevant citations
  2. This is "high level" chapter i.e., you'll only able to touch on several topics which could be whole chapters. So, also keep your eye out for chapters you can provide embedded links to e.g., see Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Money
  3. Overview
    1. Don't be overly ambitious in this section - probably a lot of this can be moved into subsequent sections
    2. But consider adding:
    3. an evocative description of the problem and what will be covered
    4. an image
    5. an example or case study
  4. Keep very brief (or no need to cover):
    1. Briefly summarise concept of Grand theories of motivation
    2. Introduce concept of mini-theories of motivation
  5. Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
  6. Promising balance of theory and research
  7. Consider including more examples/case studies
  8. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Underway

Figure[edit source]

  1. Excellent – A relevant figure is presented and it is appropriately captioned
  2. Cite each figure at least once in the main text

References[edit source]

  1. Very good
  2. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. capitalisation
    2. italicisation - technically, commas shouldn't be italicised

Resources[edit source]

  1. See also
    1. Excellent
  2. External links
    1. Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:21, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Crypto currency[edit source]

Hi there, weel developed chapter. I would have love to see the mention of crypto currency in here. Covid has pushed many people in crypto currency market to capitalise on uncertainties , just like the share market. ArtOfHappiness (discusscontribs) 11:14, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Book chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem
  2. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits

Overview[edit source]

  1. Well developed Overview
  2. Clear focus question(s)

Theory – Breadth[edit source]

  1. Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained
  2. Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters)

Theory – Depth[edit source]

  1. Appropriate depth is provided about the selected theory(ies)
  2. Key citations are well used
  3. Tables and/or lists could be used more effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information
  4. Useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts

Research – Key findings[edit source]

  1. Relevant research is well reviewed
  2. More detail about key studies would be ideal
  3. Greater emphasis on effect sizes, major reviews, and/or meta-analyses would be helpful

Research – Critical thinking[edit source]

  1. Basic critical thinking about relevant research is evident
  2. Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by:
    1. describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies
    2. discussing the direction of relationships
    3. considering the strength of relationships
    4. acknowledging limitations
    5. pointing out critiques/counterarguments
    6. suggesting specific directions for future research
  3. Some claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)

Integration[edit source]

  1. Discussion of theory and research is well integrated

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. Key points are well summarised
  2. Add practical, take-home message(s) in response to each focus question

Written expression – Style[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is very good
    2. Direct quotes are over used; much better to write in your own words
    3. Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences
    4. Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead:
      1. it is, most often, not needed at all, or
      2. use section linking
    5. "People" is often a better term than "individuals"
    6. Well done on using gender-neutral language (e.g., they)
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections
  3. Grammar
    1. Use serial commas[1] – they are part of APA style and are generally recommended by grammaticists. See explanatory video (1 min)
    2. Check and correct use of that vs. who
  4. APA style
    1. Direct quotes need page numbers – even better, write in your own words
    2. Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression; use quotation marks only for the first occurrence of the word or phrase, not for subsequent occurrences" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159)
    3. Figures
      1. Figures are very well captioned
      2. Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text
      3. Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation)
    4. Citations use correct APA style
    5. References are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. Check and correct use of capitalisation[2]

Written expression – Learning features[edit source]

  1. Overall, the use of learning features is excellent/
  2. Basic use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example.
  3. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
  4. Good use of image(s). Increase size of Figure 2.
  5. No use of table(s)
  6. Excellent use of feature box(es)
  7. Excellent use of quiz(zes)
  8. Excellent use of case studies or examples
  9. Good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section. Also link to relevant Wikipedia articles.
  10. Good use of external links in the "External links" section

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~10 logged, useful, minor to moderate social contributions with mostly direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:22, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent presentation

Overview[edit source]

  1. An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed and narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. This presentation has an engaging introduction to hook audience interest
  3. Focus questions are presented

Content[edit source]

  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  2. The presentation addresses the topic
  3. An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
  4. The presentation is well structured (i.e., Overview, Content, Conclusion)
  5. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory
  6. The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological research
  7. The presentation includes citations to support claims
  8. The presentation makes good use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice
  9. The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. A Conclusion slide is presented with clear take-home message(s)

Audio[edit source]

  1. The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to
  2. Audio communication is clear and well paced
  3. Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement
  4. The narration is well polished
  5. Audio recording quality was good. Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality.

audio

Video[edit source]

  1. Overall, visual display quality is excellent
  2. The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides
  3. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
  4. The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time
  5. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams
  6. The presentation is very well produced

Meta-data[edit source]

  1. The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
  3. Links to and from the book chapter are provided

Licensing[edit source]

  1. Image sources and their copyright status are not communicated. Probably they are clipart public domain images, but this should still be stated.
  2. A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply