Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2021/COVID-19 pandemic impacts on emotion

Comment

For the Frustration and anger, I see you have just lockdowns so far, It would be interesting from the anti-vaxxers point of view and also vice versa peoples frustration and anger towards the anti vaxxers. I imagine there is a lot of anger from both sides trying to cope (U3202710 (discuss • contribs) = U3202710) 28/08, 21.06

Hello there, I enjoyed reading your chapter!, just a suggestion I know that you have included your takeaway points for your conclusion but I think it would be beneficial to also provide some practical takeaways in your conclusion which address each of your focus questions. Good luck! -U3202315 (discuss• contribs) 18:30, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted User page Fantastic - used effectively Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution Excellent - the second contribution is summarised with direct link(s) to evidence - this provides a good model to follow Headings Excellent Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic The Overview should not have sub-headings The key content is sections 3 to 5. There is a good chance you'll run into the maximum word count, so look to keep the content currently in sections 1 to 2 brief. Key points Avoid providing too much background information (e.g., about COVID-19). Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to other book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this chapter on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. Overview - Consider adding: a description of the problem and what will be covered examples of the range of emotions people have experienced during the pandemic, such as through a case study focus questions an image For sections which include sub-section include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings Key points are reasonably well developed for most sections, with relevant citations The content about emotions during the pandemic appears to be the current strength of this chapter Excellent focus on "solutions" - how to regulate emotion during the pandemic. Also consider exercise. And different forms of social contact. Strive to balance and integrate theory and research Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Conclusion (the most important section): hasn't been developed what might the take-home, practical messages be? in a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title? Figure Excellent A figure is presented Cite each figure at least once in the main text References Good OK For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation italicisation Resources See also Excellent External links Very good Consider whether there may be more targetted resources for this topic

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a very good chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits. Overview Reasonable Overview. This focus question isn't needed: "*Why do we have emotions and what are the core psychological theories of emotion?" (too general). Concentrate on the COVID-specific impacts on emotion. Consider adding a case study or example to help engage reader interest. Theory — Breadth There is too much general theoretical material about basic theories of emotion, with insufficient application to the COVID-19 pandemic. Instead, summarise and link to further information (such as other book chapters or Wikipedia articles) and focus on the specific topic (i.e., the sub-title question). There appears to be little connection between sections 2 and 3. Perhaps rewrite this section to focus on cognitive appraisal theory? The previous comment aside, the chapter does an excellent job of explaining how a range of emotions, both positive and negative, have been impacted by COVID-19 and how these might be coped with. Theory — Depth Good depth is provided about the selected emotions. Key citations are well used. Tables and/or lists are used effectively to help clearly convey key theoretical information. Some useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts. Research — Key findings Overall, this chapter provides a reasonably good overview of relevant research. Some more depth/detail about key studies would be useful. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful. Research — Critical thinking Critical thinking about research is basic. Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Discussion of theory and research is reasonably well integrated. Where research is discussed, it is integrated with theory. Conclusion The Conclusion provides a good summary. Consider adding practical, take-home messages. Written expression — Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is good to very good. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes. Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences. "People" is often a better term than "individuals". Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections. Sections which branch into sub-sections should include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections. Grammar, spelling, and proofreading are generally very good. APA style Do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc.. Figures and tables Refer to each Table and Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1). Provide more detailed Figure captions to help connect the figure to the text. Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example: Use ampersand (&) inside parentheses and "and" outside parentheses. References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[2] Check and correct use of italicisation Include issue numbers Written expression — Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is very good. No external links are provided. Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Good use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Good use of image(s). No use of table(s) (table was presented as an image). Excellent use of feature box(es). Excellent use of quiz(zes). No use of case studies. Social contribution ~32 logged, useful, mostly minor to moderate social contributions with direct links to evidence.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:06, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent presentation. Overview An opening slide with the title and narrated sub-title is presented and narrated - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Briefly explain why this topic is important. Content The presentation addresses the topic. An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little. The presentation is well structured. The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory. The presentation perhaps presents too much theory. The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological research. The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies. The presentation is solution-focused without shying away from the challenges. Conclusion A Conclusion is presented with a take-home message(s). Audio The audio is easy to follow and interesting to listen to. Audio communication is clear and well paced. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point. Excellent intonation to enhance listener interest and engagement. Audio recording quality was excellent. Video Overall, visual display quality is excellent. The presentation makes effective use of video animation. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images. The video is very well produced. Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title are used in the name of the presentation - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A written description of the presentation is provided. Links to and from the book chapter are provided. Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are presumably from Story Blocks, but this isn't clearly indicated. A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the video description but not in the meta-data.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)