Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2020/Mood management theory and media consumption

Comments

My peer is doing a chapter on mood management theory and media consumption, I think an interesting section to include could be tips and application after reading these points and learning about the effects of media consumption. #Emot20 (u3200789)

Types of media

Hi, this is looking good! Sorry if i skimmed over this, but maybe see/add if there is a difference between traditional media and social media?

--U3190244 (discuss • contribs) 23:08, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title Excellent FYI, have updated MMT in sub-title to make it shorter User page Excellent - used effectively Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Social contribution Excellent - summarised with direct link(s) to evidence. Section headings Basic, 3-level structure; consider revising and building to a more balanced, elaborate 2-level structure Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections. Key points In general, too much general background material and too little about MMT. Overview - Consider adding: a description of the problem and what will be covered focus questions an image an example or case study Avoid providing too much background information (i.e., about media consumption and mood as separate constructs). Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to other book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this chapter directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. Expand theory and research about MMT. Key points are reasonably well developed for most sections, with relevant citations. Consider including more examples/case studies. Conclusion (the most important section): more detail about MMT What's the answer to: "What is mood management theory and how does it explain media consumption and its effects on mood?" in a nutshell? Image Excellent References Good For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation doi formatting - make dois active hyperlinks Resources See also Good External links Include source in brackets after link

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 14:06, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a solid chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. For additional feedback, see the following comments and [ these copyedits]. Theory Relevant theories are well selected, described, integrated, and explained. Research Relevant research is well reviewed and discussed in relation to theory. When describing important research findings, consider indicating the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful. Some claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the tags). Written expression Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is good. Reduce use of weasel words which bulk out the text, but don't enhance meaning (e.g., "evident to be based off" -> "based on"). "People" is often a better term than "individuals"; similarly "participants" is preferred to "subjects". Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead, use section linking. The chapter benefited from a well developed Overview and Conclusion, with clear focus question(s) and take-home messages. Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections. Learning features Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Very good use of image(s). Basi use of table(s). Excellent use of feature box(es). Excellent use of quiz(zes). Grammar Check and correct use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's vs individuals').[1]. Use serial commas[2] - it is part of APA style and generally recommended by grammaticists. Here's a 1 min. explanatory video. Check and make correct use of commas. Check and correct use of affect vs. effect. Spelling Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour). APA style Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numerals (e.g., 10). In general, do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc.. Direct quotes need page numbers. Use double (not single) quotation marks "to introduce a word or phrase used as an ironic comment, as slang, or as an invented or coined expression; use quotation marks only for the first occurrence of the word or phrase, not for subsequent occurrences" (APA 7th ed., 2020, p. 159). Figures and tables Refer to each Table and Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation). Citations are not in full APA style. For example: Select up to a maximum of three citations per point (i.e., avoid citing four or more citations to support a single point). Multiple citations in parentheses should be listed in alphabetical order by first author surname. References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of italicisation. Social contribution ~7 logged, useful, social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:34, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent presentation. Structure and content An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little. The presentation is well structured. The presentation makes excellent use of theory. The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/basic/little/no use of research. The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies. A Conclusion slide is presented with a take-home message(s). Communication The presentation is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to watch and listen to. The presentation makes effective use of animated slides. The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides with narrated audio. Very well paced. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point. Excellent using greater intonation and articulation enhances listener interest and engagement. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images. Production quality The video is very well produced. The video is well produced using simple tools. The sub-title is missing in both the video title and on the opening slide - this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Audio recording quality was excellent. Visual display quality was excellent. Image sources and their copyright status are not provided. Either acknowledge the image sources and their licenses in the video description or remove the presentation. A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the video description but not in the meta-data. A link to the book chapter is provided. A link from the book chapter is provided. A written description of the presentation is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC)