User talk:TheoYalur
Freudian Theory
FYI, I marked page you created, Freudian Theory, for deletion for it seems to lack coherence and does not seem to be about Freudian theory. The page can be moved to your user space, where the requirements on quality, value and usefulness are much less stringent, as far as I know. --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 17:19, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
In this edit, you have emptied the Freudian Theory page. Does it mean I should feel free to delete the page? Do you prefer me to move the page to your user space, in which case it will not be deleted? --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 09:23, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
I waited a day and saw some edits of yours on 6 Oct 2024 elsewhere. So I interpreted your emptying the page as an author request for delettion. Consequently, I deleted the page. If you want the page restored and moved to your user space, you can let me know and I will do that. --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 09:50, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
I now also deleted Meet the Yunani and Cybertorture using the same reasoning. If I interpreted your intent wrongly, I can restore the pages. --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 10:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Epicurus/On Matter - β (Περὶ φύσεως β) deleted based on what looks like your request. --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 10:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Author reader pages and copyright violation
Daniel C. Dennett Reader deleted: "looks like copyright violation since it quotes over 15 paragraphs from Dennett even if attributed". --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 10:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Henri Poincaré Reader deleted: "looks like a copyright violation of Poincaré and his translator; has over 50 KB". --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 10:18, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
I have now found the following:
From my understanding of copyright, the excerpts in these pages are too long/plentiful not to constitute a copyright violation. I am therefore planning to delete these pages. --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 11:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Since you have not responded, and therefore, I have not learned anything from you suggesting an opposition to deletion or that my copyright analysis is wrong, I went ahead and deleted the pages as a probable copyright violation. --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 05:23, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
You have tagged this article of yours for speedy deletion on 11 Oct 2024. Do you want me to move the article to User:TheoYalur/A Psychoanalytic Discourse of the Web and AI instead? Articles in user space usually do not need to meet the requirements of coherence, usefulness for readers, etc. --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 05:21, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Since you moved the page to User:TheoYalur/A Psychoanalytic Discourse of the Web and AI yourself, I went ahead and deleted A Psychoanalytic Discourse of the Web and AI.
- Full list of your subpages: Special:PrefixIndex/User:TheoYalur/. --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 05:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
You have emptied this page (of yours) and tagged it for speedy deletion, with the rationale "Moved". However, I see no page User:TheoYalur/Bridge Complex. Was it really moved and if so, where? Should I really proceed and delete the page, which once had nearly 200 KB? --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 05:08, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
It seems you have moved the material from Bridge Complex to User:TheoYalur/Coin Standard, as per selected sentences and section headings. Among the level-2 section headings, we find Paranoid State of Mind, Coin-Standard, Eclipse of Intelligence, Freudian Theory, Mental Fraud System, Atheist Question. I have therefore deleted Bridge Complex. I will note that the title "Coin Standard" seems to have almost no bearing on what is in that page, except the section "Coin-Standard". --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 05:39, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
God Disorder and Wikibooks
You tagged User:TheoYalur/God Disorder for deletion as "moved to Wikibooks". However, Wikibooks does not usually accept original research (although I am not 100% clear on this) and it looks like original research (to me, it actually looks like text with reduced or poor coherence and sense). I am therefore not going to delete User:TheoYalur/God Disorder yet. If User:TheoYalur/God Disorder should be anywhere in the Wikipedia et al. universe, Wikiversity seems to be your best bet.
Some background about original research and Wikibooks is here:
From which I pick: B:Wikibooks:Original research (a draft proposal for a Wikibooks policy or guideline):
- "In principle, Wikibooks discourages original research. In practice, however, Wikibooks allows material based on repeatable information from personal experiences or from common knowledge when published literature might reasonably support it, or consensus might reasonably agree with its inclusion. If questions do arise, questionable material must cite a reliable publication to be kept "
--Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 05:08, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Potentially affiliated users
Are User:GodDisorder and User:PsychoanalystoSingle affiliated with you in any way? They edited User:TheoYalur/God Disorder. --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 08:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC)