User:Salmon of Doubt
Moulton was considered by many editors of Wikipedia to be disruptive[1]. 14 users requested that Moulton agree to learn and abide by the project's fundamental polices and guidelines, agree to immediately desist from edit warring on any and all articles related to the Discovery Institute, A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism, Rosalind Picard or James Tour, agree to desist from badgering, harassment and disrupting talk pages, or canvassing for help in doing so, agree to recuse himself permanently from editing any article which represents a [conflict of interest] for him, Rosalind Picard in particular, and agree to recuse himself permanently from editing all articles related to Evolution, Creationism, Intelligent design and related controversies. Other than Moulton, not a single user exonerated his content - his most passionate defenders wrote that "Moulton has certainly violated several rules, and the RfC has been earned."
A very serious template presented seriously
- Is committed to presenting a balanced, objective, accurate, and informative account of all relevant scholarly evidence, facts, analysis, and ideas within all scholarly topics of study in the interest of full disclosure and honesty.
- Does not condone illegal, deceptive, or otherwise unethical practices in their own contributions or in others'.
- May for research purposes contribute outside of the restrictions of NPOV.
- Will respond to all questions about the ethical caliber of their contributions on their talk page.