Talk:WikiJournal of Science/Black-and-yellow broadbill
Add topic
WikiJournal of Science
Open access • Publication charge free • Public peer review • Wikipedia-integrated
Previous
Volume 1(1)
Volume 1(2)
Volume 2(1)
Volume 3(1)
Volume 4(1)
Volume 5(1)
Volume 6(1)
This article has been through public peer review.
It was adapted from the Wikipedia page Black-and-yellow_broadbill and contains some or all of that page's content licensed under a CC BY-SA license. Post-publication review comments or direct edits can be left at the version as it appears on Wikipedia.
First submitted:
Accepted:
Article text
PDF: Download
DOI: 10.15347/WJS/2023.001
QID: Q112671406
XML: Download
Share article
Email
| 
Facebook
| 
Twitter
| 
LinkedIn
| 
Mendeley
| 
ResearchGate
Suggested citation format:
Aryan Kunkekar (28 February 2023). "Black-and-yellow broadbill". WikiJournal of Science 6 (1): 1. doi:10.15347/WJS/2023.001. Wikidata Q112671406. ISSN 2470-6345. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/36/Black-and-yellow_broadbill.pdf.
Citation metrics
AltMetrics
Page views on Wikipedia
Wikipedia: This work is adapted from the Wikipedia article Black-and-yellow broadbill (CC BY-SA). Content has also subsequently been used to update that same Wikipedia article Black-and-yellow broadbill.
License: 
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original author and source are credited.
Andrew Leung 
(handling editor) contact
Jack Hruska
Alexandre Pedro Selvatti Ferreira Nunes
Article information
Plagiarism check
Pass. Report from WMF copyvios tool flagged some false positives (not regarded as plagiarism) due to short common stock phrases. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 01:40, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
First peer review
Review by Jack Peter Hruska 
, Texas Tech University
These assessment comments were submitted on , and refer to this previous version of the article
In the ‘Taxonomy and Systematics’ section, the sister relationship between Eurylaimus javanicus and Eurylaimus ochromalus was noted prior to the Selavatti et al. publication. For example, Moyle et al. 2006 recovered them as sister taxa. At the very least this publication should be cited here (listed below). In addition, the relationships of Eurylaimus with respect to Cymbiryhnchus, Serilophus, Corydon, Pseudocalyptomena, and Psarisomus are all elucidated in the Moyle et al. paper as well.
Moyle, R. G., Chesser, R. T., Prum, R. O., Schikler, P., & Cracraft, J. (2006). Phylogeny and evolutionary history of Old World suboscine birds (Aves: Eurylaimides). American Museum Novitates, 2006(3544), 1-22.
Mr. Hruska, I've added a mention of the Moyle et al. study, but have kept the Selvatti et al. study as the primary reference for the cladogram, since the latter is newer and more comprehensive. Do you have any other comments?
Second peer review
Review by Alexandre Pedro Selvatti Ferreira Nunes , Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
These assessment comments were submitted on , and refer to this previous version of the article
Taxonomy and Systematics
- Second paragraph, third line: add common name for the genus Sarcophanops (wattled broadbill) as it is mentioned in the next sentence without links or reference to the genus name.
- Last paragraph: references should be given for the studies that had recognised the subspecies
Description
- absence of bristles at the base of the bill worth mentioning as it is in the original description. The same goes for the leg and feet characteristics, which are mentioned in the original description but are absent in the Wiki text.
- I don't think that wattled broadbill would be appropriate as a common name for Sarcophanops; after the split, wattled broadbill is used as a common name exclusively for S. steerii by all the major checklists.
- I have added citations to the articles in which the subspecies were described.
- Added relevant information about the legs and bill from the description; I've excluded information on the joining of the toes as it doesn't seem like particularly useful as a distinguishing characteristic and I haven't seen any bird species accounts that describe skeletal anatomy.
- Mr. Nunes, I've responded to all of your comments above, do you have any more comments?