Should the world adopt a one-child policy?: Revision history

4 December 2023

• curprev 09:1909:19, 4 December 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 2,872 bytes −57‎ proposal: drop the merge proposal since it did not generate enough support in many months undo

26 September 2023

• curprev 21:3221:32, 26 September 2023‎ 24.234.255.62 discuss‎ 2,929 bytes +477‎ Add objection: It is very clearly obvious. Just like it is our right to freedom, free speech, and the ability to practice any religion you want, then it should be a right to have as many kids as you want. As long as you are fully taking care of them, there should be relevant no reason to restrict it. If it becomes detrimental to the environment or society, we can advocate that people don’t do it, not force people not to, just like we do with issues like fossil fuels. undo

25 May 2023

• curprev 01:5401:54, 25 May 2023‎ DMBFFF discuss contribs‎ 2,452 bytes −5‎ m undo
• curprev 01:5301:53, 25 May 2023‎ DMBFFF discuss contribs‎ 2,457 bytes +242‎ Argument against: It might not be necessary when a population is considered as a whole. e.g. imagine 10 couples: 5 have no children, 2 have 1 each, 1 has 2 each, 1 has 6—a total of 10 children ÷ 10 couples = 1 child per couple. undo

11 January 2023

• curprev 01:5901:59, 11 January 2023‎ Sophivorus discuss contribs‎ 2,215 bytes +67‎ Suggest merge with Should we aim to reduce the Earth population? undo

21 November 2022

• curprev 14:2414:24, 21 November 2022‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 2,148 bytes +2,148‎ New resource with "{{Wikidebate}} China adopted one-child policy for multiple decades. Some speak of overpopulation and the related pressure on ecosystems. Should the world adopt a one-child policy, limiting each pair to have at most one child, or in rare exceptions two children? There is a broader question: Should we aim to reduce the Earth population?. The present question is narrower: it asks about a particular method. The kinds of arguments most interesting are going to be those..."