Should cryptocurrencies be banned?: Revision history

28 April 2024

• curprev 17:0817:08, 28 April 2024‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 4,999 bytes −171‎ drop "Should we care if people want to evade paying taxes to wasteful or warring governments, or buying say illegal booze, contraband cigarettes, or marijuana?": a question is not an argument undo

8 December 2023

• curprev 07:5907:59, 8 December 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 5,170 bytes −2,508‎ revert: this page has a predefined format and is not for a free-form text (should the contribution perhaps be moved to the talk page?) undo Tag: Manual revert
• curprev 07:1807:18, 8 December 2023‎ 103.147.87.7 discuss‎ 7,678 bytes +2,508‎ some writing material undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

4 March 2023

• curprev 22:5822:58, 4 March 2023‎ DMBFFF discuss contribs‎ 5,170 bytes −5‎ m undo
• curprev 22:5722:57, 4 March 2023‎ DMBFFF discuss contribs‎ 5,175 bytes +15‎ m undo
• curprev 22:4522:45, 4 March 2023‎ DMBFFF discuss contribs‎ 5,160 bytes +1,039‎ I'll try again. :) undo

2 March 2023

• curprev 15:1615:16, 2 March 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 4,121 bytes −585‎ drop an argument that starts with an imperative; let us readd whatever substance there was in the argument, but using declarative or pseudo-declarative statements, and ideally, each separate concern on a separate bullet item undo
• curprev 14:5514:55, 2 March 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 4,706 bytes +202‎ enhance the "possibly not for computers most people use" argument and provide an objection to it undo
• curprev 07:0507:05, 2 March 2023‎ DMBFFF discuss contribs‎ 4,504 bytes +1,930‎ added a few points and an EL. undo
• curprev 06:1006:10, 2 March 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 2,574 bytes −146‎ undo "Although pleasurable acts require energy consumption, mining cryptocurrency involves an excessive amount of energy consumption": I don't understand that argument at all; it seems of too low a quality to be accepted to the debate; let's debate that argument on the talk page to see whether anything like merit of it can be found undo Tag: Manual revert

26 February 2023

• curprev 14:2114:21, 26 February 2023‎ 176.202.180.51 discuss‎ 2,720 bytes +146‎ Add objection: Although pleasurable acts require energy consumption, mining cryptocurrency involves an excessive amount of energy consumption. undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

3 January 2023

• curprev 15:0915:09, 3 January 2023‎ Shivanarayana discuss contribs‎ m 2,574 bytes −32‎ Undid edits by 103.95.166.178 (talk) to last version by Dan Polansky: spam undo Tags: Undo SWViewer [1.4]
• curprev 15:0015:00, 3 January 2023‎ 103.95.166.178 discuss‎ 2,606 bytes +32‎ →‎Cryptocurrencies undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

20 December 2022

• curprev 08:1708:17, 20 December 2022‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 2,574 bytes +31‎ No edit summary undo

19 December 2022

• curprev 20:2120:21, 19 December 2022‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 2,543 bytes −3‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 20:2120:21, 19 December 2022‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 2,546 bytes +557‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 20:1220:12, 19 December 2022‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 1,989 bytes +354‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 19:5119:51, 19 December 2022‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 1,635 bytes +1,635‎ New resource with "{{Wikidebate}} Should cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin be banned? ==Cryptocurrencies should be banned== ===For=== * {{Argument for}} Mining cryptocurrencies requires energy consumption and the result is creation of something redundant since 1) there are fiat currencies serving the purpose of a currency well and 2) those who fear irresponsible dealings with fiat currencies ("quantitative easing") can use gold as store of value, and no government can print gold. * {{Ar..."