Should Wiktionary votes cast be required to have a rationale?: Revision history

24 February 2024

• curprev 13:3613:36, 24 February 2024‎ Sophivorus discuss contribs‎ 2,556 bytes +18‎ Update structure undo

19 November 2023

• curprev 14:0014:00, 19 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 2,538 bytes +81‎ +rel qst undo

17 November 2023

• curprev 18:5218:52, 17 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 2,457 bytes +219‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 18:5118:51, 17 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 2,238 bytes +716‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 13:5613:56, 17 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 1,522 bytes +421‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 13:5313:53, 17 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 1,101 bytes +238‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 13:4113:41, 17 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 863 bytes +25‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 13:4113:41, 17 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 838 bytes +838‎ New resource with "{{Wikidebate}} In various places where iconized votes are cast, including formal votes, Beer parlour polls and discussions and requests for deletion, users often post rationale-free and comment-free supports or opposes. Should this be disallowed? ==Wiktionary votes cast should be required to have a rationale== ===Arguments for=== * {{Argument}} Requiring rationale bolsters the idea that arguments matter and that mere unanalyzed opinions should not prevail. * {{Argument..."