Should Wiktionary administrators be removable by one third superminority?: Revision history

4 August 2023

• curprev 11:5211:52, 4 August 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 3,257 bytes +228‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 11:0011:00, 4 August 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 3,029 bytes +57‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 10:3810:38, 4 August 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 2,972 bytes +85‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 10:2610:26, 4 August 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 2,887 bytes +532‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 10:1110:11, 4 August 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 2,355 bytes +89‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 09:4209:42, 4 August 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 2,266 bytes +44‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 09:4009:40, 4 August 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 2,222 bytes +2,222‎ New resource with "{{Wikidebate}} Wiktionary administrators are not removable one by third superminority. Should they be so removable? ==Wiktionary administrators should be removable by one third superminority== ===Arguments for=== * {{Argument for}} It would mean that a person can continue being an administrator only if there is a consensus for that, for some value of "consensus". It would greatly increase accountability, which is currently missing probably in part since administrator g..."