Should Wikipedia and other wiki user signatures be required to be unadorned default?: Revision history

27 November 2023

• curprev 09:2309:23, 27 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 1,903 bytes −19‎ update to reflect the rename undo
• curprev 09:2109:21, 27 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ m 1,922 bytes 0‎ Dan Polansky moved page Should Wiktionary user signatures be required to be unadorned default? to Should Wikipedia and other wiki user signatures be required to be unadorned default?: Make it more generic as it applies to various wikis and Wikipedia is more famous than Wiktionary undo

19 November 2023

• curprev 22:4022:40, 19 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 1,922 bytes +168‎ No edit summary undo

17 November 2023

• curprev 23:5223:52, 17 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 1,754 bytes +4‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 23:5223:52, 17 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 1,750 bytes +268‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 22:3722:37, 17 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 1,482 bytes +25‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 22:3722:37, 17 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 1,457 bytes +1,457‎ New resource with "{{Wikidebate}} Wiktionary allows users to customize their signatures. Should that be allowed? Or should it rather be mandatory to use the default signature? ==Wiktionary user signatures should be required to be unadorned default== ===Arguments for=== * {{Argument for}} Too many users tend to create unseemly looking signatures. They choose garish colors, fonts, put bizarre labels on the links to their talk page, etc. This could be addressed by creating restricting guide..."