Do natural resources exist?: Revision history

28 January 2024

• curprev 13:0913:09, 28 January 2024‎ Sophivorus discuss contribs‎ 12,265 bytes +5‎ Update structure to pro-con undo

1 December 2023

• curprev 09:5709:57, 1 December 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 12,260 bytes +37‎ →‎See also: +History of cornucopian thought undo
• curprev 09:5609:56, 1 December 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 12,223 bytes +893‎ +one more undo
• curprev 09:4909:49, 1 December 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 11,330 bytes +596‎ Jerry Taylor, 1998 undo
• curprev 09:2309:23, 1 December 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 10,734 bytes +242‎ No edit summary undo

30 November 2023

• curprev 19:1419:14, 30 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 10,492 bytes +2‎ well --> spring undo
• curprev 08:4608:46, 30 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 10,490 bytes +290‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 08:4308:43, 30 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 10,200 bytes −442‎ drop low-quality objection (there already exists a quality objection): "Everything? If I walk to a river, bend down, cup my hands, pull water to my mouth, drink it and thus hydrate myself, does any part of this process fail to meet your criteria of natural and correct? If engaging my mind and body with my natural environment to satiate a need is not right, then the very fact that I exist and have needs that require some level of effort to fulfil must predispose me to error and unnaturalness." undo

29 November 2023

• curprev 12:1012:10, 29 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 10,642 bytes +189‎ +two more refs undo
• curprev 11:5411:54, 29 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 10,453 bytes +50‎ +two more refs undo
• curprev 11:3711:37, 29 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 10,403 bytes +163‎ →‎Natural resources exist: +ref to next quotation undo
• curprev 11:2111:21, 29 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 10,240 bytes +36‎ one more ref undo
• curprev 11:1611:16, 29 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 10,204 bytes +336‎ +ref to the first arg against undo

28 November 2023

• curprev 16:1416:14, 28 November 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 9,868 bytes +35‎ →‎Further reading: structure undo

19 November 2023

• curprev 14:3714:37, 19 November 2023‎ MathXplore discuss contribs‎ m 9,833 bytes +31‎ added Category:Natural resources using HotCat undo

2 November 2023

• curprev 10:5110:51, 2 November 2023‎ 203.63.201.251 discuss‎ 9,802 bytes +221‎ Add objection: What you are describing is the quality of "resourcefulness," conducive to the transformation of a resource from one form into another; it was a resource before the process and remains as such afterwards. undo
• curprev 10:4610:46, 2 November 2023‎ 203.63.201.251 discuss‎ 9,581 bytes +442‎ Add objection: Everything? If I walk to a river, bend down, cup my hands, pull water to my mouth, drink it and thus hydrate myself, does any part of this process fail to meet your criteria of natural and correct? If engaging my mind and body with my natural environment to satiate a need is not right, then the very fact that I exist and have needs that require some level of effort to fulfil must predispose me to error and unnaturalness. undo
• curprev 10:3110:31, 2 November 2023‎ 203.63.201.251 discuss‎ 9,139 bytes +199‎ Add objection: The existence of "some resources" created with human intervention does not retract the truth that there are natural resources not created by this intervention, as per the argument. undo

23 June 2023

• curprev 13:5313:53, 23 June 2023‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 8,940 bytes +1,382‎ undo excessive editorializing undo Tag: Manual revert

7 February 2023

• curprev 19:5519:55, 7 February 2023‎ Danib93 discuss contribs‎ 7,558 bytes −807‎ →‎Arguments against: Debate was ordered. One invalid argument against was deleted. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• curprev 19:4219:42, 7 February 2023‎ Danib93 discuss contribs‎ 8,365 bytes −553‎ →‎Arguments for: Too long arguments were splitted. Debate was ordered undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
• curprev 19:2819:28, 7 February 2023‎ Danib93 discuss contribs‎ m 8,918 bytes −22‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

16 December 2022

• curprev 09:4109:41, 16 December 2022‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 8,940 bytes +574‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 09:1609:16, 16 December 2022‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 8,366 bytes +29‎ +cat undo
• curprev 09:1109:11, 16 December 2022‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 8,337 bytes +1,467‎ No edit summary undo

15 December 2022

• curprev 21:4821:48, 15 December 2022‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 6,870 bytes +998‎ →‎Natural resources exist undo
• curprev 13:5313:53, 15 December 2022‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 5,872 bytes +209‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 13:5113:51, 15 December 2022‎ Dan Polansky discuss contribs‎ 5,663 bytes +5,663‎ New resource with "{{Wikidebate}} Do natural resources exist? Some claim otherwise. This debate explores certain kinds of pseudo-arguments made by people who hold non-trivial positions in certain human institutions. The method employed in this debate is to respond to arguments made as if they were worth a serious answer, no matter how clearly false they may appear. ==Natural resources exist== ===Arguments for=== * {{Argument for}} The natural resources of land (arable, for game hunting..."