Joint Entrance Examination/AIEEE 2009/Q084 work done by electrostatic field

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to the Highschool Help Forum!

The forum is currently in "Beta" stage of development. You can ask questions and answer/discuss them. The basic functionalities are present. What's required is a more aesthetic look to the Static pages and a more user friendly setup. This will happen over the time gradually as we start creating some content.

The site has a lot of tools, like posting mathematical calculations, images and diagrams; categorizing questions and so on. Having them here is NO GOOD unless you know how to use them. I am thoroughly against compiling a list of these features and then writing about them. As soon as you do not understand how to do something or use a certain feature, report that on "How To"s Section of the forum. Your queries will be answered there.

If you have any ideas/discussion regarding the site/comments, please go to Discussions regarding Highschool Help Forum

Lastly, thanks for joining in the site's development process! It matters!


Browse All Available Categories

Physics: Introductory PhysicsMechanicsHeatWaves and OscillationsElectricity And MagnetismOpticsModern Physics
Mathematics: AlgebraTrigonometryCo-Ordinate (Analytical) GeometryCalculusVectors And 3D GeometryMiscellaneous Topics
Chemistry: General Chemistry and Physical ChemistryOrganic ChemistryInorganic Chemistry
Biology: General BiologyAnatomyPhysiologyBotanyZoology


Original Question by 203.199.213.66

Here's the question...

Statement 1 : For a charged particle moving from point P to point Q, the net work done by an electrostatic field on the particle is independent of the path connecting point P to point Q.

Statement 2 : The net work done by a conservative force on an object moving along a closed loop is zero.

  • (1) Statement-1 is true, Statement-2 is true; Statement-2 is the correct explanation of Statment-1.
  • (2) Statment-1 is true, Statement-2 is true; Statement-2 is not the correct explanation of Statement-1.
  • (3) Statement-1 is false, Statement-2 is true.
  • (4) Statement-1 is true, Statement-2 is false.

Posted by 203.199.213.66 13:40, 22 August 2009 (UTC)



What's Up?

Latest discussions on the forum

Electricity-And-Magnetism-Help

  1. Joint Entrance Examination/AIEEE 2009/Q084 work done by electrostatic field
  2. User:Thewinster/HHF/Electricity-And-Magnetism-Preload
  3. Joint Entrance Examination/AIEEE 2009/Q064 POTENTIAL
  4. Joint Entrance Examination/AIEEE 2009/Q072 RESISTANCE VS TEMPERATURE
  5. Joint Entrance Examination/2000 Screening/Q002 Uniform time varying magnetic field and induced electric field


Physics-Help

  1. Joint Entrance Examination/2000 Screening/Q014 Intermediate image in a compound microscope
  2. Joint Entrance Examination/2000 Screening/Q019 expansion of ideal gas in three different paths
  3. Joint Entrance Examination/2000 Screening/Q004 Roatting triangular frame with beads, what quantities are conserved
  4. Joint Entrance Examination/2000 Screening/Q016 Effect of changing width of slits on interference pattern
  5. Joint Entrance Examination/2000 Screening/Q020 Melting of ice and evaporation - graph


a a

Reply![1]


Reply to the thread, posted by Dharav talk

Thread post

If you notice, the two statements that are given are textbook statements. Textbooks always use these statements to describe an electrostatic field and a conservative field. This essentially means that the student is familiar with the two statements (unlike JEE Assertion/Reason statements). So the question here is, does statement 2 explain statement 1?

I'll point out one thing: - Statement 2 is about Conservative fields and loops; while statement 1 is about electrostatic fields and paths.

This is what the question focuses on, according to me. How will work across a loop being zero imply that work done is same across any path? Is an electrostatic field always conservative?

I know it's an insult to students to ask them the last question. It's THAT simple. But still, people will have doubts. After all, an induced electric field is NOT conservative! but wait a minute! Is an induced electric field electrostatic?

This is how we are supposed to learn - ask yourself as many questions as you can... you want to clear up the basics.

So, carry on with the answer and the discussion.

Additional notes

This will give you a general idea of how the discussions on this site will go. I enjoy it and now I'll have the added satisfaction that people will actually read it!

Dude, register on the site, that'll make sure that when you post questions, your name will show up and NOT your IP address!

As for the maths thing you asked...

<math>\frac{a}{b}</math>

<math>\frac{ax^2 + bx + c}{9}</math>

A list of all such formula can be found on Help:Formula

These comments, along with the notes on the left, were contributed by Dharav talk 19:21, 22 August 2009 (UTC)