User talk:SteveHenry

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Well done[edit]

Good job on setting up your account, SteveHenry. Let me know if I can do anything as you go along. 'Official' Wikiversity welcome below. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello Social psychology (psychology)/Participants/Welcome, and welcome to Wikiversity! If you need help, feel free to visit my talk page, or contact us and ask questions. After you leave a comment on a talk page, remember to sign and date; it helps everyone follow the threads of the discussion. The signature icon Button sig.png in the edit window makes it simple. To get started, you may


And don't forget to explore Wikiversity with the links to your left. Be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage, and see you around Wikiversity! ---- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


Crystal Clear app gnome.png
Jack-Russell-Terrier.jpg

Woof! My name is Jack(Russell). I am a dog and a Wikiversity mascot. I am pretty new around Wikiversity. Perhaps we can learn together! Tail wag...

Definitions[edit]

The definitions are helpful, but they are I think already available? e.g., Aggression/Keywords, Prejudice/Keywords, Prosocial behavior/Keywords. So, you could just link to them if there are the same. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Internal wiki links[edit]

Hi Steve, your portfolio is really coming along - keep it up and let me know if I can do anything. A little tip is that you can use internal linking styles for wikipedia links. For example, see this change I made. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:45, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

E-portfolio Feedback for SteveHenry[edit]

Hi SteveHenry,

Thanks for participating in the social psychology unit. I have read your e-portfolio and have provided some feedback below. The marks will put be posted on WebCT 24 or 25 November. I will email the discussion list when they are available. Feel free to let me know if you have any comments, concerns, questions. I also welcome your feedback here.

Regularity/Continuity[edit]

Regular edits were evident (compared to others! Smiley.svg - with coverage across almost all lecture/reading/tutorial topics. (DI)

Depth/Insightfulness[edit]

Useful, interesting material and reflections. The selected Wikipedia links were excellent (amongst the effective use of these). Perhaps closer reading/reflection of some aspects could have been demonstrated (some topics were treated fairly lightly). Good evidence of thoughtful engagement in the tutorials. The final reflections were also of interest. Thanks for these. (DI)

Overall/General/Other[edit]

No comment

Contributions/Statistics[edit]

Sincerely, James Neill - talk - email

P.S. If you are dissatisfied with the marking and feedback, please see the marking dispute process.