User talk:Starcaster88

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome!

Hello and Welcome to Wikiversity Starcaster88! You can contact us with questions at the colloquium or me personally when you need help. Please remember to sign and date your finished comments when participating in discussions. The signature icon OOUI JS signature icon LTR.svg above the edit window makes it simple. All users are expected to abide by our Privacy, Civility, and the Terms of Use policies while at Wikiversity.

To get started, you may


You do not need to be an educator to edit. You only need to be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage. See you around Wikiversity! --~~~~

--Juan 06:50, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

How to work effectively[edit]

Hi, I have seen your editation in User:Starcaster88. Could you use more "Show preview" instead of "Save page" after each edit? I mean if you click on "Show preview" it will shouw you the page how it will look like after saving. Via this system, you can do more edits without saving each one. Its has also many advantages, such as the history: [1] is not so long. And if you provide and edit summary to that line which is up from "Save page", leter on you can easily find and appropriate version i.e. appropriate change.

E.g. my edit summary for these edits: "welcome temlate; information about "Show preview" and writing edit summary" can be find in history of this page: [2] --Juan 06:50, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

E-portfolio Feedback for Starcaster88[edit]

Hi Starcaster88,

Thanks for participating in the social psychology unit. I have read your e-portfolio and have provided some feedback below. The marks will put be posted on WebCT 24 or 25 November. I will email the discussion list when they are available. Feel free to let me know if you have any comments, concerns, questions. I also welcome your feedback here.

Regularity/Continuity[edit]

The major lecture/reading topics are considered (mostly added in the last 24 hours). No evidence of tutorial or multimedia engagement. (P)

Depth/Insightfulness[edit]

For each topic, an interesting reflection or example is provided. Some of this content, though, seems to be somewhat tangential (e.g., interesting stuff about the flaxwood guitars, but....what about the rest of environmental - how does it relate? What did you learn? etc. The workplace examples provided good evidence of you applying social psychology knowledge. Nice use of boxes. No evidence of additional engagement (e.g., reading/commenting on others' pages). (P)

Overall/General/Other[edit]

No comment

Contributions/Statistics[edit]

Sincerely, James Neill - talk - email

P.S. If you are dissatisfied with the marking and feedback, please see the marking dispute process.