User talk:RTG

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello RTG, and welcome to Wikiversity! If you need help, feel free to visit my talk page, or contact us and ask questions. After you leave a comment on a talk page, remember to sign and date; it helps everyone follow the threads of the discussion. The signature icon Button sig.png in the edit window makes it simple. To get started, you may

And don't forget to explore Wikiversity with the links to your left. Be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage, and see you around Wikiversity! --AFriedman 17:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Crystal Clear app gnome.png
Baby goats jan 2007 crop.jpg
Hello RTG, we are the Baah and Bahh twins and we'd both like to welcome you to Wikiversity. While you sit back and explore Wikiversity, enjoy some of our fresh goat milk. You can help us learn by creating new learning resources or help us by improving the guided tours and other exploration tools. We look forward to seeing you around. Baaaahbye for now.


This is your on Wikiversity warning. You have been active in a campaign that including misstating events and manipulating other users to the point of misleading people about the actuality of events taking place on Wikiversity. This resulted in massive drama, blocks, and a desysopping. This is a serious abuse of the editing function, and you continue to manipulate the facts on multiple projects. You have broken multiple portions of our civility policy (Lies) and many other concepts that were provided by the WMF (trolling, using Wikiversity as a forum for disruption).

It is one thing to have an opinion or a disagreement, it is another to claim that a project is promoting the socking and disruption of other projects when that has clearly already been stopped. You will be indef blocked for cross-wiki abuse and using this project to disrupt multiple projects if you continue. Ottava Rima (talk) 21:18, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

I claim that Editing Wikimedia Ethics/Ethical Breaching Experiments this page was deleted before I made this edit. And it was. So you are lying about it not me. And it is my privelidge to claim that projects which say "possibly execute experiments" in sock puppeting with "how to" pages are encouraging sock puppeting. The discussions are not cross-wiki because I made them so. I will continue to post on those discussions if I am encouraged or feel I have something relevant to say so go harrass a custodian instead because if you want to punish nme you will need one of those to do it. Thanks anyways. ~ R.T.G 23:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
The admin on Wikiversity and now the Stewards know that when you posted to Jimbo Wales your misleading statement about a breaching experiment happening, you also posted that a possible breaching experiment would be to mislead and manipulate an admin or steward in order to get them to shut down a project. This is exactly what you tried to do. Such actions are unacceptable on Wikiversity. Ottava Rima (talk) 23:50, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
By the way, the matter is this: "And it is my privelidge to claim that projects which say "possibly execute experiments" in sock puppeting with "how to" pages are encouraging sock puppeting." You knew 100% that the how to page supporting sock puppetry was deleted 11 days before you posted anything about the matter. Your statements above are false and unacceptable. Ottava Rima (talk) 23:51, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
I am telling you, the project supported it not just the how to page. There is obviously a lot of other editors in agreement with that. My statement is false? I am lying and cross-wiki trolling? ~ R.T.G 23:56, 27 March 2010 (UTC)