User talk:Ozzie10aaaa

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

.............Journal (medicine)*// #PEER REVIEWER#+ //WikiJournal of Medicine logo.svgWikiJournal of Medicine..............[edit]

suggest[edit]

Ozzie10aaaa (discusscontribs) 19:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Ebola v.



  • Mikael Häggström knowing reviewers cant author papers, however below have put together a suggestion that you may accept/decline (or consider for later) for anyone who might be interested, hoping this is helpful for the journal, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (discusscontribs) 15:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
EVD
  • suggestion among possible topics for future issues,could be a literature review which looks at 1.pathophysiological mechanism aspects of the Ebola virus disease that might make it susceptible to certain treatments, and 2. the efficacy of ZMapp to treat the Ebola virus disease based on current secondary (and other sources if needed) references.

possible sources[edit]




Thanks for the suggestions! It is inadvisable (but not impossible) to submit a work as a participant of the journal (see Publishing#Participants in the journal). You could also try contacting and inviting people who you may think are interested in authoring such a work. Mikael Häggström (discusscontribs) 15:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

thank you(update)
Talk:WikiJournal of Medicine/2016#Publishing Wikipedia articles

new name/user group status[edit]



Credentials for peer reviewing an article on genetics[edit]

Hi again!

WikiJournal of Medicine now has a submission about genetics. If you'd be interested in peer reviewing it, I first want you to provide some credentials of your expertise in molecular biology, such as a link to a reliable webpage, or copies of certification documents. You may email it to editor.in.chief@wijoumed.org, and I will then keep it confidential.

Best regards,

Mikael Häggström (discusscontribs) 21:02, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Mikael Häggström per [5] this month has gone ~1600 edits to ~380 (RL work increased/time of year[6]...as you know I've been signed on since 7 August[7])...im very grateful for the opportunity to do a proper review, due to the aforementioned reason, I will have to pass. I would guess the last week of December things will slow down again, and I hope I can be afforded another opportunity. Thank you again--Ozzie10aaaa (discusscontribs) 01:50, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
Very well. I will let you know if there is a fitting submission next year then. Mikael Häggström (discusscontribs) 08:30, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
  • postscript am interested in 2-4 reviews per yr.(if possible)
Red XN or Green tickY
More check mark, cross mark and related templates
Check marks and Cross marks
Check marks Cross marks
{{Check mark}} Green tickY {{X mark big}} Red XN
{{Tick}} = {{Tick|20}} YesY {{Cross}} = {{Cross|20}} N
{{Y}}, {{aye}} Green tickY {{N}}, {{nay}} Red XN
{{Check mark-n}} YesY {{X mark-n}} NoN
{{Y&}} {{N&}}
File:☑.svg Check mark.svg File:☒.svg ☒.svg
Other marks
{{n.b.}} Nota bene* {{hmmm}} ????
{{bang}} Symbol opinion vote.svg
Most of the templates above are fully sortable in a class="sortable" table (each check mark is assigned an undisplayed "Y" and each cross mark an undisplayed "N").

Article on Rotavirus/(response:                )[edit]

Hi!

We now have a submission on Rotavirus. Could you peer review this one?

Best regards,

Mikael Häggström (discusscontribs) 19:19, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

will look at article and consider(will inform you should I have the time/email you needed Peer reviewer cred.)thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (discusscontribs) 19:41, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your consideration! We now have one peer review, and we'd like the second one to be from someone outside the Wikiversity project, so you can help by being a peer review coordinator for this purpose when you have the time. Mikael Häggström (discusscontribs) 18:10, 16 April 2017 (UTC)


┌─────────────────────────────────┘
(see new name subsection)












































categoryuser group