User talk:Logan520

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome!

Hello and Welcome to Wikiversity Logan520! You can contact us with questions at the colloquium or me personally when you need help. Please remember to sign and date your finished comments when participating in discussions. The signature icon Insert-signature.png above the edit window makes it simple. All users are expected to abide by our Privacy, Civility, and the Terms of Use policies while at Wikiversity.

To get started, you may


You do not need to be an educator to edit. You only need to be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage. See you around Wikiversity! --Dave Braunschweig (discusscontribs) 00:31, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SCCAP[edit source]

Hi Logan520!

Your resource page Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology (SCCAP) appears well-developed and ready for learners! Would you like to have it announced on our Main Page News! --Marshallsumter (discusscontribs) 00:35, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit source]

RMaung (WMF) 14:29, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit source]

RMaung (WMF) 19:11, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit source]

RMaung (WMF) 17:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We sent you an e-mail[edit source]

Hello Logan520,

Really sorry for the inconvenience. This is a gentle note to request that you check your email. We sent you a message titled "The Community Insights survey is coming!". If you have questions, email surveys@wikimedia.org.

You can see my explanation here.

MediaWiki message delivery (discusscontribs) 18:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Referee report query[edit source]

Hi Logan520,

I saw that you added a first referee report here -- thanks! I had a couple of questions about it:

  1. It seems like the "this previous version" history link is broken, is that something you can fix?
  2. Is there a standard format (template, etc.) for responding to referee reports?

(Or, if you're not the right person, if you could point me in their direction.)

Thanks, JayBeeEll (discusscontribs) 17:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JaybeeEll,

No problem! In terms of the link, I had a look and am not sure why it isn't working. @Evolution and evolvability: may have created the template that it is pulling from and be able to help. In terms of responding, have a look at this section on the WikiJournal and then you can click the response template to get an example of its use. I'd also recommend looking at another preprint with peer reviews if you want another example. Let me know if you have other questions! --Logan520 (discusscontribs) 21:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much! --JayBeeEll (discusscontribs) 00:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi JayBeeEll. Sadly that history link is the best that's currently automatable (the only item in that history log link at the time it was reviewed should be this version). Eventually we aim to work out a way to point to the actual page permalink, but at the moment the software isn't implemented, so I agree it's really unclear. The standard way to respond to reviewer comments is currently to post the response directly to the discussion page inside {{response|your comments here}} template. It can either be point-by-point (example) or as a single block (example). I'm working on a solution using the [reply] buttons that you see after comments here. ~~~~ T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 04:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! --JayBeeEll (discusscontribs) 01:31, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]