User talk:Kellyknight138

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Well done[edit]

Good job on setting up your account, Kellyknight138. Let me know if I can do anything as you go along. 'Official' Wikiversity welcome below. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello Kellyknight138, and welcome to Wikiversity! If you need help, feel free to visit my talk page, or contact us and ask questions. After you leave a comment on a talk page, remember to sign and date; it helps everyone follow the threads of the discussion. The signature icon Button sig.png in the edit window makes it simple. To get started, you may


And don't forget to explore Wikiversity with the links to your left. Be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage, and see you around Wikiversity! ---- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


Crystal Clear app gnome.png
3D Universe Percy w cloths 1.png

Hi Kellyknight138, I am Percy. Nice to meet you. I love the beach, swimming, fishing, and I am currently doing some research at Wikiversity on oceanography. I am also learning to play piano. What do you like? Can I be your mascot?

Headings[edit]

FYI, I've added headings for the two topics so far. You can make headings using two equal signs before and after. e.g., ==Week 5== -- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:35, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

E-portfolio Feedback for Kellyknight138[edit]

Hi Kellyknight138,

Thanks for participating in the social psychology unit. I have read your e-portfolio and have provided some feedback below. The marks will put be posted on WebCT 24 or 25 November. I will email the discussion list when they are available. Feel free to let me know if you have any comments, concerns, questions. I also welcome your feedback here.

Regularity/Continuity[edit]

Evidence here for regularity of engagement is very good for tutorials (except the first one?), but poor for the lecture/textbook content. (F)

Depth/Insightfulness[edit]

Depth of the engagement is strongest for the culture shock example, but is otherwise lacking a demonstrated basis in reading and understanding of the range of key concepts. It is good to see a critical approach, although this would be more convincing is the opinion could be supported by informed analysis/argument. The depth of engagement is satisfactory for the topics covered, but the coverage/scope was rather selective. (F)

Overall/General/Other[edit]

No comment

Contributions/Statistics[edit]

Sincerely, James Neill - talk - email

P.S. If you are dissatisfied with the marking and feedback, please see the marking dispute process.