User talk:JD Hawk

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Well done[edit]

Good job on setting your account, JD Hawk. Let me know if I can do anything as you go along. 'Official' Wikiversity welcome below. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 17:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello JD Hawk, and welcome to Wikiversity! If you need help, feel free to visit my talk page, or contact us and ask questions. After you leave a comment on a talk page, remember to sign and date; it helps everyone follow the threads of the discussion. The signature icon Button sig.png in the edit window makes it simple. To get started, you may


And don't forget to explore Wikiversity with the links to your left. Be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage, and see you around Wikiversity! ---- Jtneill - Talk - c 17:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


Crystal Clear app gnome.png
Jack-Russell-Terrier.jpg

Woof! My name is Jack(Russell). I am a dog and a Wikiversity mascot. I am pretty new around Wikiversity. Perhaps we can learn together! Tail wag...

User page and talk page[edit]

Hi JD Hawk, FYI, I've shifted your initial reflections from here (your talk page) to your user page which is User:JD Hawk. Sincerely, -- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:33, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

some pictures[edit]

Hello, it certainly does not give the same effect as you describe, but I was curious about what you talk (never been to Australia) and found some pictures:

E-portfolio Feedback for JD Hawk[edit]

Hi JD Hawk,

Thanks for participating in the social psychology unit. I have read your e-portfolio and have provided some feedback below. The marks will put be posted on WebCT 24 or 25 November. I will email the discussion list when they are available. Feel free to let me know if you have any comments, concerns, questions. I also welcome your feedback here.

Regularity/Continuity[edit]

Regular engagement in the lectures is evident (via the recordings?) - but no mention of Ghosts of Rwanda? No evidence of engagement with tutorials or textbook. (F)

Depth/Insightfulness[edit]

Minimal but adequate depth of engagement with covered topics. Could consider providing evidence of closer reading, examples, references, links, etc. Limited range of coverage due to no tutorial reflections. (F)

Overall/General/Other[edit]

No comment

Contributions/Statistics[edit]

Sincerely, James Neill - talk - email

P.S. If you are dissatisfied with the marking and feedback, please see the marking dispute process.